148. Competent authorities should periodically review whether their AML/CFT RBS Model delivers the …

Competent authorities should periodically review whether their AML/CFT RBS Model delivers the intended outcome and, in particular, whether the level of supervisory resources remains commensurate with the ML/TF risks identified. Competent authorities should use a variety of tools available to them when reviewing and assessing the adequacy and effectiveness of their AML/CFT RBS Model. These tools include, but are not limited to:

•  A1
• a) professional and technical expertise;
•  O
• b) self-assessment questionnaires ;
• c) sample testing of supervisory measures and actions;
• d) new information such as reports and feedback from other competent authorities or relevant AML/CFT authorities,
• e) feedback from financial intelligence units, law enforcement and other national agencies; or
• f) publications by relevant European or international organisations.

1. Přehled

1.1 Odkazy

1.2 Identifikované požadavky

1.3 Související standardy

2. Identifikované požadavky

3. Související standardy

• EBA -

  EN: Guidelines and other publications of the European Banking Authority (EBA), https://www.eba.europa.eu/. © European Banking Authority. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged (EBA legal notice). Divided into sections and converted into the GRCA format, the wording unchanged. Only the versions published by the EBA are authoritative.

  DE: Leitlinien und weitere Veröffentlichungen der Europäischen Bankenaufsichtsbehörde (EBA), https://www.eba.europa.eu/. © European Banking Authority. Wiedergabe mit Quellenangabe gestattet (Rechtlicher Hinweis der EBA). In Abschnitte aufgeteilt und in das GRCA-Format umgewandelt, der Wortlaut unverändert. Maßgeblich sind allein die von der EBA veröffentlichten Fassungen.