+VDR-CSO General Provider Responsibilities
---+VDR-CSO-DET Vulnerability Detection
---+VDR-CSO-RES Vulnerability Response
---+VDR-CSO-FAV Failures Are Vulnerabilities
---+VDR-CSO-DFR Design For Resilience
---+VDR-CSO-ADT Automate Detection
---+VDR-CSO-DAC Detect After Changes
---+VDR-CSO-MSP Maintain Security
---+VDR-CSO-AKE Avoid KEVs
---+VDR-CSO-SIR Sampling
|
VDR-CSO General Provider Responsibilities
These rules apply to all providers with FedRAMP Certifications of any type. - Types: 20x, Rev5
- Paths: Program, Agency
- Classes: B, C, D
- Affects: Providers
1. Übersicht
| Bezeichnung |
Standard |
|
VDR-CSO-DET Vulnerability Detection
|
Providers MUST systematically, persistently, and promptly discover and identify vulnerabilities within their cloud service offering using appropriate techniques such as assessment, scanning, threat intelligence, vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, bug bounties, penetration testing, incident response, automated control testing, supply chain monitoring, and other relevant capabilities; this process is called vulnerability detection. Vulnerability detection includes persistently verifying and validating that information resources and processes are operating as intended and documented for FedRAMP Practices. Warning: Vulnerability Detection and Response includes all efforts to identify weaknesses in a system and is NOT limited to traditional vulnerability scanning or testing. An out-of-date control statement in the Security Decision Record is a vulnerability that must be detected and remediated just like any other vulnerability. NotesFedRAMP's vulnerability detection (and response) rules are intended to set modern expectations for maintaining the security of a cloud service. Historical FedRAMP guidance on vulnerability scanning or continuous monitoring generally focused only on CVE-type vulnerabilities while leaving other types of vulnerabilities and exposures unaddressed. Providers are encouraged to leverage their existing holistic security review, architecture review, and similar processes to meet these requirements. FedRAMP strongly discourages providers from implementing separate vulnerability detection and response processes for FedRAMP reporting that are operated by independent compliance branches unless these processes are consuming data directly from the areas of the cloud service that actively maintain it. NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 controls: AU-5(2), AU-6, CA-8, CA-8(1), CA-8(2), RA-5, RA-5(2), RA-5(3), RA-5(4), SI-2, SI-3, SI-4(1), SI-4(12), SI-4(18), SI-4(22), SI-5(1) Defined terms: Cloud Service Offering, FedRAMP Practices, Incident, Information Resource, Persistently, Promptly, Vulnerability, Vulnerability Detection, Vulnerability Response
|
|
VDR-CSO-RES Vulnerability Response
|
Providers MUST systematically, persistently, and promptly track, evaluate, monitor, mitigate, remediate, assess exploitation of, report, and otherwise manage all detected vulnerabilities within their cloud service offering; this process is called vulnerability response. NotesIf it is not possible to fully mitigate vulnerabilities or remediate vulnerabilities, providers SHOULD instead partially mitigate vulnerabilities promptly, progressively, and persistently. FedRAMP does not use the terms "mitigation" and "remediation" interchangeably. Mitigation is the process of reducing the risk and impact of a vulnerability through partial mitigation and even full mitigation; remediation is the process of entirely eliminating the vulnerability. A fully mitigated vulnerability will still exist (with negligible risk) until it has been remediated. This separation is based on the plain language definitions of these words. Please refer to FedRAMP Definitions for strict interpretation in the FedRAMP context. NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 controls: AU-5(2), IR-4(11), IR-9(3), RA-7, SI-2, SI-3 Defined terms: Cloud Service Offering, Fully Mitigated Vulnerability, Partially Mitigated Vulnerability, Persistently, Promptly, Remediated Vulnerability, Vulnerability, Vulnerability Detection, Vulnerability Response
|
|
VDR-CSO-FAV Failures Are Vulnerabilities
|
Providers MUST treat problems or failures with their vulnerability detection and response processes as vulnerabilities. NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 controls: AU-5(2), SI-4, SI-4(1), SI-7(7) Defined terms: Vulnerability, Vulnerability Detection, Vulnerability Response
|
|
VDR-CSO-DFR Design For Resilience
|
Providers SHOULD make design and architecture decisions for their cloud service offering that mitigate the risk of vulnerabilities by default AND decrease the risk and complexity of vulnerability detection and response. Defined terms: Cloud Service Offering, Vulnerability, Vulnerability Detection, Vulnerability Response
|
|
VDR-CSO-ADT Automate Detection
|
Providers SHOULD use automated services to improve and streamline vulnerability detection and response. NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 controls: RA-5, SI-2(2), SI-3, SI-4(2), SI-4(5) Defined terms: Vulnerability, Vulnerability Detection, Vulnerability Response
|
|
VDR-CSO-DAC Detect After Changes
|
Providers SHOULD automatically perform vulnerability detection on representative samples of new or significantly changed information resources. NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 controls: RA-5 Defined terms: Information Resource, Vulnerability, Vulnerability Detection
|
|
VDR-CSO-MSP Maintain Security
|
Providers SHOULD NOT weaken the security of information resources to facilitate vulnerability scanning, detection, or assessment activities. NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 controls: RA-5(5), SI-2 Defined terms: Information Resource, Vulnerability, Vulnerability Detection
|
|
VDR-CSO-AKE Avoid KEVs
|
Providers SHOULD NOT deploy or otherwise activate new machine-based information resources with Known Exploited Vulnerabilities. NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 controls: RA-5, SI-5 Defined terms: Information Resource, Known Exploited Vulnerability (KEV), Machine-Based (Information Resources), Vulnerability
|
|
VDR-CSO-SIR Sampling
|
Providers MAY sample effectively identical information resources, especially machine-based information resources, when performing vulnerability detection UNLESS doing so would decrease the efficiency or effectiveness of vulnerability detection. NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 controls: RA-5(3), RA-5(5) Defined terms: Information Resource, Machine-Based (Information Resources), Vulnerability, Vulnerability Detection
|
1.1 Referenzen
1.2 Identifizierte Anforderungen
1.3 Zugehörige Regulierungen
2. Identifizierte Anforderungen
Anforderungen
| Quelle |
Anforderung |
3. Zugehörige Regulierungen
Regulierungen
| Quelle |
Regulierung |
- FedRAMP Consolidated Rules -
EN: FedRAMP® Consolidated Rules of the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program, U.S. General Services Administration (GSA), https://www.fedramp.gov/, from their machine-readable version (FedRAMP/rules). Works of the U.S. Government are not subject to copyright protection in the United States (17 U.S.C. § 105; GSA website policies); GSA dedicated its machine-readable FedRAMP content to the public domain worldwide (CC0 1.0). FedRAMP® is a registered trademark of GSA; GRCA is not affiliated with, nor endorsed by, GSA or FedRAMP. Divided into sections and converted into the GRCA format, the wording unchanged, linked to the NIST SP 800-53 controls they name. Only the version published by FedRAMP is authoritative.
DE: FedRAMP® Consolidated Rules des Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program, U.S. General Services Administration (GSA), https://www.fedramp.gov/, aus ihrer maschinenlesbaren Fassung (FedRAMP/rules). Werke der US-Regierung sind in den USA urheberrechtlich nicht geschützt (17 U.S.C. § 105; Website-Richtlinien der GSA); die GSA hat ihre maschinenlesbaren FedRAMP-Inhalte weltweit gemeinfrei gestellt (CC0 1.0). FedRAMP® ist eine eingetragene Marke der GSA; GRCA steht in keiner Verbindung zur GSA oder zu FedRAMP und wird von ihnen nicht unterstützt. In Abschnitte aufgeteilt und in das GRCA-Format umgewandelt, der Wortlaut unverändert, mit den genannten Controls aus NIST SP 800-53 verknüpft. Maßgeblich ist allein die von FedRAMP veröffentlichte Fassung.
|