Assessment Objectives
In addition to relevant policies, standards and procedures, the assessor shall examine, interview, and/or test to determine if appropriately scoped evidence exists to support the claim that:
- END-02_A01 security configuration settings for information technology products employed in the system are established and included in the baseline configuration.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: 171A_3.4.2[a] - END-02_A02 a current baseline configuration for systems, applications and services is developed and documented.
Assessment rigor: 2
Origin: 171A_3.4.1[a] 53A_R5_CM-02a.[01] - END-02_A03 the baseline configuration includes hardware, software, firmware and documentation.
Assessment rigor: 2
Origin: 171A_3.4.1[b] - END-02_A04 the baseline configuration is maintained (reviewed / updated) throughout the system development life cycle under configuration control.
Assessment rigor: 2
Origin: 171A_3.4.1[c] 53A_R5_CM-02a.[02] - END-02_A05 security configuration settings for information technology products employed in the system are enforced.
Assessment rigor: 2
Origin: 171A_3.4.2[b] 53A_R5_CM-06b. - END-02_A06 configuration settings that reflect the most restrictive mode consistent with operational requirements are established and documented for components employed within the system using organization-defined common secure configurations.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_CM-06a. - END-02_A07 a control baseline for the system is selected.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_PL-10 - END-02_A08 thresholds to which attack surfaces are to be reduced are defined.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_SA-15(05)_ODP - END-02_A09 the developer of the system, system component or system service is required to reduce attack surfaces to organization-defined thresholds.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_SA-15(05) - END-02_A10 approved authorizations are enforced for controlling the flow of CUI within the system.
Assessment rigor: NIST 800-171
Origin: 171A_R3_A.03.01.03[01] - END-02_A11 endpoint security management operations are conducted according to documented policies, standards, procedures and/or other organizational directives.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: SCF Created - END-02_A12 the resources required to support endpoint security management operations, including people, processes, technologies, data and/or facilities, are provided.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: SCF Created - END-02_A13 responsibility and authority for the performance of endpoint security management-related activities are assigned to designated personnel.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: SCF Created - END-02_A14 personnel performing endpoint security management-related activities have the skills and knowledge needed to perform their assigned duties.
Assessment rigor: 2
Origin: SCF Created
Verknüpfte Vorgänge
| Verknüpfungstyp | Vorgang |
|---|---|
| blocks | Endpoint Device Management (EDM) |
- Secure Controls Framework -
The Secure Controls Framework® (SCF)
"The SCF is the Common Controls Framework™ (CCF), the world's most comprehensive cybersecurity and data privacy metaframework - it is also free to use. The entire concept is building secure, compliant and resilient capabilities in the most efficient and cost-effective manner possible.
The SCF is more than just a unified control catalog, since its included content creates a playbook for Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) capabilities. Used globally by organizations of every size, the SCF is a robust and scalable solution for security, compliance and resilience controls. As a comprehensive security framework, the SCF maps 1,400+ controls across 200+ laws, regulations, and industry frameworks so you can implement once and comply everywhere.
Like it or not, cybersecurity is a protracted war on an asymmetric battlefield, where the threats are everywhere and as defenders we have to make the effort to work together to help improve cybersecurity and data privacy practices, since we all suffer when massive data breaches occur or when cyber attacks have physical impacts. Hackers share information on attack methods with other hackers, so why shouldn’t the good guys share information on how to best protect an organization? We decided to take action and make a difference, since we feel it is too important to wait for someone else to fix the problems that exist.
The SCF is made up of volunteers, mainly specialists within the cybersecurity profession, who focus on GRC and the cybersecurity side of data privacy. These are auditors, engineers, architects, incident responders, consultants and other specialists who live and breathe these topics on a daily basis. The end product is "expert-derived content" that makes up the SCF." https://securecontrolsframework.com/Terms & Conditions
The SCF End User License Agreement (EULA) governs the use of the Secure Controls Framework® (SCF) under the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License.