Assessment Objectives
In addition to relevant policies, standards and procedures, the assessor shall examine, interview, and/or test to determine if appropriately scoped evidence exists to support the claim that:
- THR-04_A01 external organizations from whom system security alerts, advisories and directives are to be received on an ongoing basis are defined.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: 53A_R5_SI-05_ODP[01] 172A_3.14.6e_ODP[1] - THR-04_A02 personnel or roles to whom security alerts, advisories and directives are to be disseminated is/are defined.
Defined parameters: to include system security personnel and administrators with configuration/patch-management responsibilities
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: 53A_R5_SI-05_ODP[02] 53A_R5_SI-05_ODP[03] - THR-04_A03 elements within the organization to whom security alerts, advisories and directives are to be disseminated are defined.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: 53A_R5_SI-05_ODP[04] - THR-04_A04 external organizations to whom security alerts, advisories and directives are to be disseminated are defined.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: 53A_R5_SI-05_ODP[05] - THR-04_A05 system security alerts, advisories, and directives from external organizations are received on an ongoing basis.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: 53A_R5_SI-05a. 171A_R3_A.03.14.03.a - THR-04_A06 threat indicator information is identified.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: 172A_3.14.6e[a] - THR-04_A07 effective mitigations are identified.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: 172A_3.14.6e[b] - THR-04_A08 intrusion detection approaches are identified.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: 172A_3.14.6e[c] - THR-04_A09 threat hunting activities are identified.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: 172A_3.14.6e[d] - THR-04_A10 internal security alerts, advisories and directives are generated as deemed necessary.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_SI-05b. - THR-04_A11 security alerts, advisories and directives are disseminated per organization-defined criteria.
Defined parameters: to include system security personnel and administrators with configuration/patch-management responsibilities
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_SI-05c. - THR-04_A12 security directives are implemented in accordance with established time frames or if the issuing organization is notified of the degree of noncompliance.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_SI-05d. - THR-04_A13 external organizations from which to obtain threat indicator information and effective mitigations are defined.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 172A_3.14.6e_ODP[1] - THR-04_A14 automated mechanisms used to broadcast security alert and advisory information throughout the organization are defined.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_SI-05(01)_ODP - THR-04_A15 automated mechanisms are used to broadcast security alerts and advisory information throughout the organization.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_SI-05(01) - THR-04_A16 automated mechanisms are employed to maximize the effectiveness of sharing threat intelligence information.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_PM-16(01)
Verknüpfte Vorgänge
| Verknüpfungstyp | Vorgang |
|---|---|
| blocks | Threat Intelligence Feeds |
- Secure Controls Framework -
The Secure Controls Framework® (SCF)
"The SCF is the Common Controls Framework™ (CCF), the world's most comprehensive cybersecurity and data privacy metaframework - it is also free to use. The entire concept is building secure, compliant and resilient capabilities in the most efficient and cost-effective manner possible.
The SCF is more than just a unified control catalog, since its included content creates a playbook for Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) capabilities. Used globally by organizations of every size, the SCF is a robust and scalable solution for security, compliance and resilience controls. As a comprehensive security framework, the SCF maps 1,400+ controls across 200+ laws, regulations, and industry frameworks so you can implement once and comply everywhere.
Like it or not, cybersecurity is a protracted war on an asymmetric battlefield, where the threats are everywhere and as defenders we have to make the effort to work together to help improve cybersecurity and data privacy practices, since we all suffer when massive data breaches occur or when cyber attacks have physical impacts. Hackers share information on attack methods with other hackers, so why shouldn’t the good guys share information on how to best protect an organization? We decided to take action and make a difference, since we feel it is too important to wait for someone else to fix the problems that exist.
The SCF is made up of volunteers, mainly specialists within the cybersecurity profession, who focus on GRC and the cybersecurity side of data privacy. These are auditors, engineers, architects, incident responders, consultants and other specialists who live and breathe these topics on a daily basis. The end product is "expert-derived content" that makes up the SCF." https://securecontrolsframework.com/Terms & Conditions
The SCF End User License Agreement (EULA) governs the use of the Secure Controls Framework® (SCF) under the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License.