+IVV-CSO General Provider Responsibilities
---+IVV-CSO-FIA FedRAMP Independent Assessments
---+IVV-CSO-SEI Supply Evidence of Implementation
---+IVV-CSO-SEE Supply Evidence of Effectiveness
---+IVV-CSO-ICP Inclusion in Certification Package
---+IVV-CSO-DUS Document Use of Representative Samples
---+IVV-CSO-STE Supply Technical Explanations
---+IVV-CSO-USR Use Representative Samples
---+IVV-CSO-RAA Receiving Assessor Advice

IVV-CSO General Provider Responsibilities

These rules apply to cloud service providers obtaining and maintaining any FedRAMP Certification.

  • Types: 20x, Rev5
  • Paths: Program, Agency
  • Classes: B, C, D
  • Affects: Providers

1. Overview

Summary Standard
IVV-CSO-FIA FedRAMP Independent Assessments

Notes

The first such completed assessment is typically called an "initial assessment" while following assessments are called "annual assessments."

The specific requirements for independent verification and validation assessments are documented by the FedRAMP Certification Class and Type.

The option for assessment by FedRAMP directly is limited to cloud services that are explicitly prioritized by FedRAMP, in consultation with the FedRAMP Board and the federal Chief Information Officers Council; this is _extremely_ rare.

FedRAMP Recognized independent assessment services are listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace.

Class A

Providers with Class A Certifications MAY persistently complete an independent verification and validation assessment of all applicable FedRAMP rules with a FedRAMP Recognized independent assessment service OR FedRAMP at least once per year; this is a FedRAMP independent assessment.

Timeframe: 1 year

Class B

Providers with Class B Certifications MUST persistently complete an independent verification and validation assessment of all applicable FedRAMP rules with a FedRAMP Recognized independent assessment service OR FedRAMP at least once per year; this is a FedRAMP independent assessment.

Timeframe: 1 year

Class C

Providers with Class C Certifications MUST persistently complete an independent verification and validation assessment of all applicable FedRAMP rules with a FedRAMP Recognized independent assessment service OR FedRAMP at least once per year; this is a FedRAMP independent assessment.

Timeframe: 1 year

Class D

Providers with Class D Certifications MUST persistently complete an independent verification and validation assessment of all applicable FedRAMP rules with a FedRAMP Recognized independent assessment service OR FedRAMP at least once per year; this is a FedRAMP independent assessment.

Timeframe: 1 year

NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 controls: CA-2, CA-2(1), CA-2(2), CA-7(1), CA-7(4)

Defined terms: Certification Class, FedRAMP Independent Assessment, FedRAMP Recognized, Persistently, Validation, Verification

IVV-CSO-SEI Supply Evidence of Implementation

Providers MUST supply evidence to all necessary assessors of the implementation of the measures that have been documented to meet FedRAMP Practices; this evidence is the result of verification.

Note

For example, if the documentation says that firewall rules are used to block traffic then the cloud service provider would verify that firewall rules are in place to block traffic and supply that evidence to assessors (preferably by allowing them to see how firewall configurations are deployed from a source of truth).

Defined terms: All Necessary Assessors, FedRAMP Practices, Verification

IVV-CSO-SEE Supply Evidence of Effectiveness

Providers MUST supply evidence to all necessary assessors of the effectiveness of the measures that have been implemented to meet FedRAMP Practices; this evidence is the result of validation.

Note

For example, after verifying that firewalls are configured to block traffic following IVV-CSO-SEI (Supply Evidence of Implementation), the provider would validate that traffic is actually being blocked and supply evidence of that validation to assessors (such as by allowing them to see metrics on the traffic that is blocked vs not).

Related rules: IVV-CSO-SEI

Defined terms: All Necessary Assessors, FedRAMP Practices, Validation

IVV-CSO-ICP Inclusion in Certification Package

Providers MUST supply the results of FedRAMP independent assessments in their FedRAMP Certification Package without inappropriate modification.

Notes

Inappropriate modification in this context means changing the underlying intent/etc. of the content provided by the independent assessment service - the content itself may be modified for presentation, formatting, etc. as needed.

This rule is related to IVV-IAS-VIP (Verify Inclusion in Certification Package).

Related rules: IVV-IAS-VIP

Defined terms: Certification Package, FedRAMP Independent Assessment, Verification

IVV-CSO-DUS Document Use of Representative Samples

Providers MUST document and explain the use of representative samples during verification and validation when using representative samples as allowed by IVV-CSO-USR (Use Representative Samples).

Related rules: IVV-CSO-USR

Defined terms: Validation, Verification

IVV-CSO-STE Supply Technical Explanations

Providers SHOULD supply all necessary assessors with technical explanations, demonstrations, and other relevant supporting information about the technical capabilities they employ to address FedRAMP rules; this SHOULD be supplied as necessary to ensure the assessor can effectively complete verification and validation.

Defined terms: All Necessary Assessors, Validation, Verification

IVV-CSO-USR Use Representative Samples

Providers MAY use representative samples as appropriate during verification and validation.

Note

Many modern cloud services using effective automation do not need to use representative sampling and are capable of persistently verifying and validating the majority of their security measures automatically.

Defined terms: Persistently, Validation, Verification

IVV-CSO-RAA Receiving Assessor Advice

Providers MAY ask for and accept advice from their assessor during assessment regarding techniques and procedures that will improve their security posture or the effectiveness, clarity, and accuracy of their verification, validation and reporting procedures, UNLESS doing so is likely to compromise the objectivity and integrity of the assessment.

Defined terms: Likely, Validation, Verification

1.1 References

1.2 Identified Requirements

1.3 Related Regulations

2. Identified Requirements

Requirements
Source Requirement

3. Related Regulations

Regulations
Source Regulation
  • FedRAMP Consolidated Rules -

    EN: FedRAMP® Consolidated Rules of the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program, U.S. General Services Administration (GSA), https://www.fedramp.gov/, from their machine-readable version (FedRAMP/rules). Works of the U.S. Government are not subject to copyright protection in the United States (17 U.S.C. § 105; GSA website policies); GSA dedicated its machine-readable FedRAMP content to the public domain worldwide (CC0 1.0). FedRAMP® is a registered trademark of GSA; GRCA is not affiliated with, nor endorsed by, GSA or FedRAMP. Divided into sections and converted into the GRCA format, the wording unchanged, linked to the NIST SP 800-53 controls they name. Only the version published by FedRAMP is authoritative.

    DE: FedRAMP® Consolidated Rules des Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program, U.S. General Services Administration (GSA), https://www.fedramp.gov/, aus ihrer maschinenlesbaren Fassung (FedRAMP/rules). Werke der US-Regierung sind in den USA urheberrechtlich nicht geschützt (17 U.S.C. § 105; Website-Richtlinien der GSA); die GSA hat ihre maschinenlesbaren FedRAMP-Inhalte weltweit gemeinfrei gestellt (CC0 1.0). FedRAMP® ist eine eingetragene Marke der GSA; GRCA steht in keiner Verbindung zur GSA oder zu FedRAMP und wird von ihnen nicht unterstützt. In Abschnitte aufgeteilt und in das GRCA-Format umgewandelt, der Wortlaut unverändert, mit den genannten Controls aus NIST SP 800-53 verknüpft. Maßgeblich ist allein die von FedRAMP veröffentlichte Fassung.