A sound, comprehensive and well-documented ICT risk management framework is in place. Which as goal to address all ICT risks properly and ensure a high level of digital resilience. The reponsibility for risk management is properly assigned to a control function. 

The ICT risk management framework shall be documented and reviewed at least annually, or periodically for microenterprises, with immediate reviews triggered by major ICT-related incidents or supervisory feedback. Continuous improvement will be ensured by incorporating lessons learned from implementation, monitoring, and audits. The report of the review will be prepared according to the requirements as stated in chapter 5 (Article 27) of the RTS RM and will be made available for submission to the competent authority upon request. 

Assess new standards and relevant technology developments in the field of information security, cybersecurity and resilience on a continuous basis and make proposals on how they can strengthen the information security and cybersecurity control measures of the institution.

The effectiveness of the risk management framework is monitored based on the risk exposure over time to critical or important business functions. Implement a reviewing and auditing process, with a minimum yearly review of the framework, triggered by major ICT incidents, regulator instructions, or major audit findings. 

The tasks of verifying compliance with ICT risk management requirements may be outsourced to intra-group or external undertakings. In case of such outsourcing, the financial entity remains fully responsible for the verification of compliance with the ICT risk management requirements.

Maintain a comprehensive third-party risk management program which includes:

• A register of information related to the use of thirdparty service providers, especially those supporting critical or important functions (see also control 17.3).
• Put in place a policy on the management of ICT third-parties, including the criteria for determining the criticality of service providers and the internal responsibilities for managing third-parties.
• Ensuring that senior management reviews the policy and designate a member to monitor relations with the third-parties and the contractual arrangements.
• A (holistic) multi-vendor strategy, if deemed relevant,  showing key dependencies on ICT third-party service providers and explaining the rationale behind the procurement mix of ICT third-party service providers.  

Manage third-party risks proportionate to dependency nature, service-related risks, and impact on entity's continuity and availability in case of disruption. Implement a policy for critical function ICT services provided by third-party service providers, considering the location of the service provider (or its parent company), the level of assurance regarding the service providers' risk management framework (including risk mitigation and business continuity measures), the nature of the data shared with the service provider, the location of data processing and storage, group affiliation of the service provider, and the potential impact of the risks and disruptions on the continuity and availability on the activities of the entity. Test response and recovery of critical function-supporting services provided by third parties.

Perform pre-contract risk assessment. This assessment must assess if: the contract covers services supporting critical or important functions, a service provider is easily replaceable, the risks of sub-contracting are covered, the risks of outsourcing service to a third-country are covered, the risks of bankruptcy are covered on the side of the service provider, supervisory conditions for contracting are met, all contractual risks are identified and assessed (e.g., to cover for ICT concentration risks), the service provider is suitable, and if there are conflicts of interest. Assess service provider resources for ensuring entity compliance with all legal and regulatory requirements.

Develop and periodically test exit strategies and plans, considering risks related to third-party service providers, including potential failure, service quality deterioration, business disruption, and termination of contractual arrangements. Ensure that the exit plan is realistic, feasible, based on plausible scenarios and reasonable assumptions and shall have a planned implementation schedule compatible with the exit and termination terms established in the relevant contractual arrangements. Also, ensure smooth exit and workload migration to another service provider without business disruption, compliance loss, or service quality decline.

The DORA Taskforce has designed an exit plan template that could be of assistence, see: https://www.norea.nl/dora/dora-template-exit-plan 

Implement policies and procedures to protect all information, ICT assets, and relevant physical ICT components and infrastructures. At least the following policies shall be established and maintained.

• Security policy
• Human resources policy
• Encryption and cryptographic control policy
• Identity and access management (IAM) policy
• Change management policy
• Network security policy
• ICT operating policies and procedures
• (Crisis) Communication policy
• Vulnerability and patch management policy
• Back up policy
• Project management policy
• Physical and environmental security policy
• Business continuity policy with response and recovery plans (including testing plans), see control1.4 *
• ICT third-party service providers management policy, see control 1.1. *
• Operations of ICT assets (ensuring network security, protect against intrusions and data misuse and defining how the entity operates, monitors, controls, and restores ICT assets, including the documentation of ICT operations).

* must be approved by the Management body