+525. Following the above assessment, competent authorities should form an overall risk on the key …
|
525. Following the above assessment, competent authorities should form an overall risk on the key …
Following the above assessment, competent authorities should form an overall risk on the key risks of the TCB. This view should be reflected in an annual summary of the overall SREP assessment, accompanied by a viability score based on the considerations specified in table 21. The annual summary should also include any supervisory findings made over the course of the previous 12 months. Table 21. Supervisory considerations for assigning the overall SREP score Score Supervisory view Considerations | The risks identified pose a low 1 level of risk to the viability of t he TCB branch. | • • • • • • • | The TCB’s business model and strategy do not raise concerns. The TCB’s internal governance and controls arrangements do not raise concerns. The TCB’s risks are not material or risk management and controls are adequate to mitigate those risks that are identified as material. The TCB’s capital endowment and liquidity position do not raise concerns. The TCB’s booking arrangements do not raise concerns. There is a low to medium level of concern about the TCB’s business model and strategy. There is a low to medium level of concern about the TCB’s governance or control arrangements. | | The risks identified pose a 2 medium-low level of risk to t he viability of the TCB. | • • • • • | There is a low to medium level of concern about the TCB’s material risks and their management and control. There is a low to medium level of concern about the TCB's capital endowment and/or liquidity position. There is a low to medium level of concern about the TCB’s booking arrangements. There is a medium to high level of concern about the TCB’s business model and strategy. There is a medium to high level of concern about the TCB’s governance or control arrangements. | | The risks identified pose a 3 medium-high level of risk to t he viability of the TCB. | • • • • • | There is a medium to high level of concern about the TCB’s material risks and their management and control. There is a medium to high level of concern about the TCB's capital endowment and/or liquidity position. There is a medium to high level of concern about the TCB ’ s booking arrangements. There is a high level of concern about the TCB’s business model and strategy. There is a high level of concern about the TCB’s governance or control arrangements. | | The risks identified pose a 4 high level of risk to the viability of the TCB. | • • • | There is a high level of concern about the TCB’s material risks and their management and control. There is a high level of concern about the TCB ’ s capital endowment and/or liquidity position. There is a high level of concern about the TCB’s booking arrangements. |
1. Ülevaade
1.1 Viited
1.2 Tuvastatud nõuded
1.3 Seotud standardid
2. Tuvastatud nõuded
3. Seotud standardid
- EBA - Published by the European Banking Authority at https://www.eba.europa.eu/
|