+Statutory, Regulatory & Contractual Compliance

Statutory, Regulatory & Contractual Compliance

Description

Mechanisms exist to facilitate the identification and implementation of relevant statutory, regulatory and contractual controls.

Possible Solutions & Considerations

Micro-Small Business (<10 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 1-2

∙ SCF Security, Compliance & Resilience Management System (SCRMS)
∙ Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) solution (e.g., SCFConnect, SureCloud, Ostendio, SimpleRisk, Ignyte, ZenGRC, Galvanize, MetricStream, Archer, etc.)

Small Business (10-49 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 3-4

∙ SCF Security, Compliance & Resilience Management System (SCRMS)
∙ Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) solution (e.g., SCFConnect, SureCloud, Ostendio, SimpleRisk, Ignyte, ZenGRC, Galvanize, MetricStream, Archer, etc.)

Medium Business (50-249 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 5-6

∙ SCF Security, Compliance & Resilience Management System (SCRMS)
∙ Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) solution (e.g., SCFConnect, SureCloud, Ostendio, SimpleRisk, Ignyte, ZenGRC, Galvanize, MetricStream, Archer, etc.)
∙ Steering committee

Large Business (250-999 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 7-8

∙ SCF Security, Compliance & Resilience Management System (SCRMS)
∙ GRC solution (e.g., SCFConnect, Cyturus, SureCloud, SimpleRisk, Ignyte, ZenGRC, Galvanize, MetricStream, Archer, etc.)
∙ Steering committee

Enterprise (> 1,000 staff) / BLS Firm Size Class 9

∙ SCF Security, Compliance & Resilience Management System (SCRMS)
∙ GRC solution (e.g., SCFConnect, Cyturus, SureCloud, SimpleRisk, Ignyte, ZenGRC, Galvanize, MetricStream, Archer, etc.)
∙ Steering committee

SCR-CMM

Level 0 Not Performed

Practices are non-existent, based on the inability to demonstrate an implemented and operational capability. A reasonable person would conclude the control is not being performed.

Level 1 Performed Informally

Compliance (CPL) domain capabilities are ad hoc and inconsistent. Capability criteria associated with this control may include:
▪ Policies, standards & procedures associated with CPL domain capabilities provide limited coverage due to the depth and breadth of the existing documentation.
▪ Compliance management-related activities are decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
▪ Compliance efforts are narrowly-limited to certain compliance requirements.
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity personnel use an informal process to govern statutory, regulatory and contractual compliance obligations.

Level 2 Planned Tracked

Compliance (CPL) capabilities are requirements-driven, but are not standardized across the entity (e.g., local/regional level consistency). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with CPL domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with CPL domain capabilities are documented and maintained by process owners.
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity personnel work with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with CPL domain capabilities to address applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD).
▪ Compliance management controls-related controls are primarily administrative and preventative in nature (e.g., policies, standards and procedures & guidelines).
▪ Compliance management may be a defined function (e.g., team or department) or assigned as an additional duty to existing IT and/or cybersecurity personnel.
▪ External compliance requirements for cybersecurity and data privacy are identified and documented, based on applicable laws, regulations and contractual obligations.
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity perform an informal annual review of existing compliance requirements and research evolving or new requirements.

Level 3 Well Defined

Compliance (CPL) capabilities are standardized across the entity for applicability to People, Processes, Technologies, Data and/or Facilities (PPTDF) to ensure consistency for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with CPL domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with CPL domain capabilities are well-documented and kept current by process owners.
▪ A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function, is appropriately staffed and supported to implement and maintain CPL domain capabilities.
▪ Technology is leveraged to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of governance, risk management and compliance operations (e.g., GRC platform).
▪ The entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function, works with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with CPL domain capabilities to address Minimum Compliance Requirements (MCR) (e.g., applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements) and Discretionary Security Requirements (DSR) (e.g., entity-required controls).
▪ An implemented and operational capability exists to facilitate the identification and implementation of relevant statutory, regulatory and contractual controls.

Level 4 Quantitatively Controlled

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ While it may be possible to develop “metrics-driven” capabilities for this control, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.

Level 5 Continuously Improving

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 or Level 4 (if available) criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ Level 5 capabilities should be considered “world-class” where the control builds on Level 4 capabilities, but are continuously improving through Artificial Intelligence (AI) and/or Machine Learning (ML) technologies.
▪ While it may be possible to develop responsive capabilities for this control through the use of AI and/or ML technologies, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.

1. Ülevaade

1.1 Viited

1.2 Tuvastatud nõuded

1.3 Seotud regulatsioonid

2. Tuvastatud nõuded

Nõuded

3. Seotud regulatsioonid

Regulatsioonid
EULAW Artikkel 32 Töötlemise turvalisus
-
DELAW BDSG § 9 Zuständigkeit

(1) Die oder der Bundesbeauftragte ist zuständig für die Aufsicht über die öffentlichen Stellen des Bundes, auch soweit sie als öffentlich-rechtliche Unternehmen am Wettbewerb teilnehmen, sowie über Unternehmen, soweit diese für die geschäftsmäßige Erbringung von Telekommunikationsdienstleistungen Daten von natürlichen oder juristischen Personen verarbeiten und sich die Zuständigkeit nicht bereits aus § 29 des Telekommunikation-Digitale-Dienste-Datenschutz-Gesetzes ergibt. Die Vorschriften dieses Kapitels gelten auch für Auftragsverarbeiter, soweit sie nichtöffentliche Stellen sind, bei denen dem Bund die Mehrheit der Anteile gehört oder die Mehrheit der Stimmen zusteht und der Auftraggeber eine öffentliche Stelle des Bundes ist.

(2) Die oder der Bundesbeauftragte ist nicht zuständig für die Aufsicht über die von den Bundesgerichten im Rahmen ihrer justiziellen Tätigkeit vorgenommenen Verarbeitungen.
EULAW Artikkel 16 Suure riskiga tehisintellektisüsteemide pakkujate kohustused

Artikkel 16

Suure riskiga tehisintellektisüsteemide pakkujate kohustused

Suure riskiga tehisintellektisüsteemide pakkujad:

a) 

tagavad, et nende suure riskiga tehisintellektisüsteemid vastavad 2. jaos sätestatud nõuetele;

b) 

märgivad suure riskiga tehisintellektisüsteemile, või kui see ei ole võimalik, selle pakendile või kaasasolevatesse dokumentidesse vastavalt kas oma nime, registreeritud kaubanime või registreeritud kaubamärgi ning aadressi, millel saab nendega ühendust võtta;

c) 

võtavad kasutusele kvaliteedijuhtimissüsteemi, mis vastab artikli 17 nõuetele;

d) 

säilitavad dokumentatsiooni, millele on osutatud artiklis 18;

e) 

säilitavad oma suure riskiga tehisintellektisüsteemide automaatselt loodud logisid, kui need on nende kontrolli all, nagu on osutatud artiklis 19;

f) 

tagavad, et suure riskiga tehisintellektisüsteem läbib enne turule laskmist või kasutusele võtmist asjakohase vastavushindamise, nagu on osutatud artiklis 43;

g) 

koostavad ELi vastavusdeklaratsiooni vastavalt artiklile 47;

h) 

kinnitavad suure riskiga tehisintellektisüsteemile CE-märgise, või kui see ei ole võimalik, siis selle pakendile või kaasasolevatele dokumentidele, et tõendada vastavust käesolevale määrusele kooskõlas artikliga 48;

i) 

täidavad artikli 49 lõikes 1 osutatud registreerimiskohustusi;

j) 

võtavad vajalikke parandusmeetmeid ja esitavad artiklis 20 nõutud teavet;

k) 

tõendavad riigi pädeva asutuse põhjendatud taotluse korral suure riskiga tehisintellektisüsteemi vastavust 2. jaos sätestatud nõuetele;

l) 

tagavad, et suure riskiga tehisintellektisüsteem vastab direktiivide (EL) 2016/2102 ja (EL) 2019/882 kohastele ligipääsetavusnõuetele.
EULAW Artikkel 17 Kvaliteedijuhtimissüsteem
-
EULAW Artikkel 21 Koostöö pädevate asutustega
-
EULAW Artikkel 40 Harmoneeritud standardid ja standardimisdokumendid
-
EULAW Artikkel 4 Proportsionaalsuse põhimõte
-
EULAW Artikkel 5 Juhtimine ja organisatsioon
-
EULAW Artikkel 21 Küberturvalisuse riskijuhtimismeetmed
-
EULAW Artikkel 6 Digielemente sisaldavate toodete suhtes kehtivad nõuded

Artikkel 6

Digielemente sisaldavate toodete suhtes kehtivad nõuded

Digielemente sisaldavad tooted tehakse turul kättesaadavaks üksnes juhul, kui:

a) 

need vastavad I lisa I osas sätestatud olulistele küberturvalisuse nõuetele, tingimusel et nad on nõuetekohaselt paigaldatud ja hooldatud, neid kasutatakse sihtotstarbeliselt või tingimustes, mida võib mõistlikult prognoosida, ja neile on paigaldatud vajalikud turvauuendused, kui see on kohaldatav, ning

b) 

tootja rakendatud protsessid vastavad I lisa II osas sätestatud olulistele küberturvalisuse nõuetele.
EULAW Artikkel 12 Suure riskiga tehisintellektisüsteemid
-
EULAW Artikkel 19 Importijate kohustused
-
EULAW Artikkel 23 Ettevõtjate identifitseerimine
-
EULAW Artikkel 24 Avatud lähtekoodiga tarkvara korraldaja kohustused
-
DELAW BDSG § 76 Protokollierung

(1) In automatisierten Verarbeitungssystemen haben Verantwortliche und Auftragsverarbeiter mindestens die folgenden Verarbeitungsvorgänge zu protokollieren:

1.
Erhebung,
2.
Veränderung,
3.
Abfrage,
4.
Offenlegung einschließlich Übermittlung,
5.
Kombination und
6.
Löschung.

(2) Die Protokolle über Abfragen und Offenlegungen müssen es ermöglichen, die Begründung, das Datum und die Uhrzeit dieser Vorgänge und so weit wie möglich die Identität der Person, die die personenbezogenen Daten abgefragt oder offengelegt hat, und die Identität des Empfängers der Daten festzustellen.

(3) Die Protokolle dürfen ausschließlich für die Überprüfung der Rechtmäßigkeit der Datenverarbeitung durch die Datenschutzbeauftragte oder den Datenschutzbeauftragten, die Bundesbeauftragte oder den Bundesbeauftragten und die betroffene Person sowie für die Eigenüberwachung, für die Gewährleistung der Integrität und Sicherheit der personenbezogenen Daten und für Strafverfahren verwendet werden.

(4) Die Protokolldaten sind am Ende des auf deren Generierung folgenden Jahres zu löschen.

(5) Der Verantwortliche und der Auftragsverarbeiter haben die Protokolle der oder dem Bundesbeauftragten auf Anforderung zur Verfügung zu stellen.
DELAW BDSG § 77 Vertrauliche Meldung von Verstößen

Der Verantwortliche hat zu ermöglichen, dass ihm vertrauliche Meldungen über in seinem Verantwortungsbereich erfolgende Verstöße gegen Datenschutzvorschriften zugeleitet werden können.
EULAW Article 4 1

1.   Financial entities shall implement the rules laid down in Chapter II in accordance with the principle of proportionality, taking into account their size and overall risk profile, and the nature, scale and complexity of their services, activities and operations.
EULAW Article 4 2

2.   In addition, the application by financial entities of Chapters III, IV and V, Section I, shall be proportionate to their size and overall risk profile, and to the nature, scale and complexity of their services, activities and operations, as specifically provided for in the relevant rules of those Chapters.
EULAW Article 4 3

3.   The competent authorities shall consider the application of the proportionality principle by financial entities when reviewing the consistency of the ICT risk management framework on the basis of the reports submitted upon the request of competent authorities pursuant to Article 6(5) and Article 16(2).
EULAW Article 5 4

4.   Members of the management body of the financial entity shall actively keep up to date with sufficient knowledge and skills to understand and assess ICT risk and its impact on the operations of the financial entity, including by following specific training on a regular basis, commensurate to the ICT risk being managed.
EULAW Artikkel 97 Autentimine
-

Lingitud teemad

Lingid
is related to Annual
is related to relative Control Weighting = 10
is related to Process
is related to Detect
is related to SCRM Focus Tier 1 STRATEGIC
is related to SCRM Focus Tier 2 OPERATIONAL
is related to SCRM Focus Tier 3 TACTICAL
blocks Loss of Accountability / Attribution
blocks Excessive or Unauthorized Privilege
blocks Unauthorized Privilege Elevation
blocks Unauthorized Access
blocks Loss, Theft or Damage of Assets
blocks Unauthorized Modification / Loss of System Integrity
blocks Unauthorized Retention / Inability to Dispose of Data
blocks Business / Service Interruption
blocks Data Loss / Integrity Compromise
blocks Reduced Operational Productivity
blocks System / Data Compromise (Technical Vector)
blocks System / Data Compromise (Non-Technical Vector)
blocks Revenue Loss
blocks Contractual Default / Termination
blocks Loss of Competitive Advantage
blocks Reputational Harm / Loss of Stakeholder Trust
blocks Regulatory / Legal / Contractual Financial Liability
blocks Exposure from Unaddressed Vulnerabilities
blocks System / Service Compromise
blocks Failure to Support Business / Mission Objectives
blocks Unaddressed Security / Compliance Exposure
blocks Unperformed / Unowned Control Responsibilities
blocks Uncontrolled Internal Security / Privacy Exposure
blocks Uncontrolled Third-Party Security / Privacy Exposure
blocks Lack of oversight of internal controls
blocks Lack of oversight of third-party controls
blocks Harm from Illegal, Abusive or Unsafe Content / Conduct
blocks Loss of Investigative / Evidentiary Capability
blocks Delayed Containment / Increased Incident Impact
blocks Incident Persistence / Recurrence
blocks Incident Response / Recovery Cost
blocks Undetected / Delayed Detection of Adverse Activity
blocks Lack of a security-minded workforce
blocks Third-Party Cybersecurity Compromise / Exposure
blocks Third-Party Physical Security Disruption / Exposure
blocks Sub-Tier / Fourth-Party Supply Chain Exposure
blocks Third-Party Legal / Compliance Exposure
blocks Harm from Unauthorized / Unintended Product or Service Use
blocks Third-Party Dependency Failure
blocks Data Obfuscation
blocks Junk Data
blocks Steganography
blocks Protocol or Service Impersonation
blocks OS Credential Dumping
blocks LSASS Memory
blocks Security Account Manager
blocks NTDS
blocks LSA Secrets
blocks Cached Domain Credentials
blocks DCSync
blocks Proc Filesystem
blocks /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow
blocks Fallback Channels
blocks SMB/Windows Admin Shares
blocks VNC
blocks Scheduled Transfer
blocks Data Transfer Size Limits
blocks Masquerading
blocks Rename Legitimate Utilities
blocks Match Legitimate Resource Name or Location
blocks Double File Extension
blocks Boot or Logon Initialization Scripts
blocks Login Hook
blocks Network Logon Script
blocks RC Scripts
blocks Startup Items
blocks Exfiltration Over C2 Channel
blocks Network Service Discovery
blocks Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol
blocks Exfiltration Over Symmetric Encrypted Non-C2 Protocol
blocks Exfiltration Over Asymmetric Encrypted Non-C2 Protocol
blocks Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol
blocks Exfiltration Over Physical Medium
blocks Exfiltration over USB
blocks Systemd Timers
blocks Proc Memory
blocks GUI Input Capture
blocks Command and Scripting Interpreter
blocks Visual Basic
blocks JavaScript
blocks AutoHotKey & AutoIT
blocks Exploitation for Privilege Escalation
blocks Indicator Removal
blocks Clear Command History
blocks Clear Network Connection History and Configurations
blocks Clear Mailbox Data
blocks Clear Persistence
blocks Application Layer Protocol
blocks Web Protocols
blocks File Transfer Protocols
blocks Mail Protocols
blocks DNS
blocks Software Deployment Tools
blocks Valid Accounts
blocks Default Accounts
blocks Local Accounts
blocks Cloud Accounts
blocks Taint Shared Content
blocks Proxy
blocks Internal Proxy
blocks External Proxy
blocks Multi-hop Proxy
blocks Non-Application Layer Protocol
blocks Web Service
blocks Dead Drop Resolver
blocks Bidirectional Communication
blocks One-Way Communication
blocks Multi-Stage Channels
blocks Ingress Tool Transfer
blocks Brute Force
blocks Password Guessing
blocks Password Cracking
blocks Password Spraying
blocks Credential Stuffing
blocks Multi-Factor Authentication Interception
blocks Data Encoding
blocks Standard Encoding
blocks Non-Standard Encoding
blocks Software Extensions
blocks Browser Session Hijacking
blocks Forced Authentication
blocks Drive-by Compromise
blocks Exploit Public-Facing Application
blocks Supply Chain Compromise
blocks Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools
blocks Compromise Software Supply Chain
blocks BITS Jobs
blocks Password Policy Discovery
blocks Exploitation for Client Execution
blocks User Execution
blocks Malicious Link
blocks Malicious File
blocks Malicious Image
blocks Traffic Signaling
blocks Port Knocking
blocks Exploitation of Remote Services
blocks Exploitation for Stealth
blocks Exploitation for Credential Access
blocks Data from Information Repositories
blocks Confluence
blocks Sharepoint
blocks Code Repositories
blocks Customer Relationship Management Software
blocks Messaging Applications
blocks System Binary Proxy Execution
blocks Control Panel
blocks Regsvr32
blocks Rundll32
blocks Verclsid
blocks Electron Applications
blocks Remote Access Tools
blocks Template Injection
blocks File and Directory Permissions Modification
blocks Windows Permissions
blocks Linux and Mac Permissions
blocks Service Stop
blocks Network Denial of Service
blocks Direct Network Flood
blocks Reflection Amplification
blocks Endpoint Denial of Service
blocks OS Exhaustion Flood
blocks Service Exhaustion Flood
blocks Application Exhaustion Flood
blocks Application or System Exploitation
blocks Steal Application Access Token
blocks Data from Cloud Storage
blocks Transfer Data to Cloud Account
blocks Steal Web Session Cookie
blocks ROMMONkit
blocks TFTP Boot
blocks Create or Modify System Process
blocks Systemd Service
blocks Windows Management Instrumentation Event Subscription
blocks Unix Shell Configuration Modification
blocks PowerShell Profile
blocks Installer Packages
blocks Time Providers
blocks XDG Autostart Entries
blocks Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism
blocks Sudo and Sudo Caching
blocks TCC Manipulation
blocks Pass the Ticket
blocks Unsecured Credentials
blocks Credentials In Files
blocks Credentials in Registry
blocks Private Keys
blocks Cloud Instance Metadata API
blocks SIP and Trust Provider Hijacking
blocks Credentials from Password Stores
blocks Keychain
blocks Securityd Memory
blocks Modify Authentication Process
blocks Domain Controller Authentication
blocks Adversary-in-the-Middle
blocks Name Resolution Poisoning and SMB Relay
blocks ARP Cache Poisoning
blocks DHCP Spoofing
blocks Evil Twin
blocks Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets
blocks Silver Ticket
blocks Kerberoasting
blocks AS-REP Roasting
blocks Ccache Files
blocks SSH Hijacking
blocks NTFS File Attributes
blocks Process Argument Spoofing
blocks Data Manipulation
blocks Stored Data Manipulation
blocks Runtime Data Manipulation
blocks Phishing
blocks Spearphishing Attachment
blocks Spearphishing Link
blocks Spearphishing via Service
blocks Exfiltration Over Web Service
blocks Dynamic Resolution
blocks Domain Generation Algorithms
blocks System Services
blocks Service Execution
blocks Lateral Tool Transfer
blocks Non-Standard Port
blocks Protocol Tunneling
blocks Encrypted Channel
blocks Symmetric Cryptography
blocks Asymmetric Cryptography
blocks Hijack Execution Flow
blocks Dylib Hijacking
blocks Path Interception by PATH Environment Variable
blocks Path Interception by Search Order Hijacking
blocks Path Interception by Unquoted Path
blocks KernelCallbackTable
blocks AppDomainManager
blocks Phishing for Information
blocks Spearphishing Service
blocks Spearphishing Attachment
blocks Spearphishing Link
blocks Network Boundary Bridging
blocks Network Address Translation Traversal
blocks Data from Configuration Repository
blocks SNMP (MIB Dump)
blocks Network Device Configuration Dump
blocks Debugger Evasion
blocks Plist File Modification
is related to Semi-Annual
is related to Govern
blocks Failure to Achieve Strategic / Mission Objectives
blocks Loss of Authorization / Certification / License
blocks Inability to Demonstrate Due Diligence / Due Care
blocks Unreliable Assurance / Decision Information
blocks Sensitive Data / Compliance Exposure from Unsanctioned AI Use
blocks AI Bias / Discriminatory Outcome
blocks Privacy Harm / Unauthorized Processing
blocks Drought & Water Shortage
blocks Earthquakes
blocks Fire & Wildfires
blocks Floods
blocks Hurricanes & Tropical Storms
blocks Landslides & Debris Flow
blocks Pandemic (Disease) Outbreaks
blocks Severe Weather
blocks Space Weather
blocks Thunderstorms & Lightning
blocks Tornadoes
blocks Tsunamis
blocks Volcanoes
blocks Winter Storms & Extreme Cold
blocks Dysfunctional Management Practices
blocks Human Error
blocks Statutory / Regulatory / Contractual Change
blocks Fraud, Corruption and/or Intentional Criminal Conduct
blocks Conflict of Interest (COI) / Undue Influence / Insider Misconduct
blocks Economic Shock / Market Disruption
blocks Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
blocks Geopolitical Conflict / Government Intervention
blocks Sanctions / Trade Restriction Disruption
blocks Workforce Shortage / Loss of Critical Skills / Labor Disruption
blocks SP-01.01B
blocks SP-02.01B
blocks HR-02.01B
blocks OPS-10.01B
blocks OPS-32.03B
blocks CRY-01.01B
blocks PI-02.01AC
blocks SSO-01.01B
blocks COM-01.01B
blocks COM-01.01AC
blocks INQ-04.02B
is blocked by CPL-02 Statutory, Regulatory & Contractual Compliance – Assessment Procedure
blocks PL-01 Policy and Procedures
blocks PM-08 Critical Infrastructure Plan
blocks PL-01 [L] Policy and Procedures
blocks PL-01 [M] Policy and Procedures
blocks PL-01 [H] Policy and Procedures
blocks PL-01 [P] Policy and Procedures
blocks PM-08 [P] Critical Infrastructure Plan
blocks 03.04.11 Information Location
blocks 03.12.01 Security Assessment
blocks GV.OC Organizational Context
blocks GV.OC-03 Legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements regarding cybersecurity - including privacy and civil liberties obligations - are understood and …
blocks GV.SC-05 Requirements to address cybersecurity risks in supply chains are established, prioritized, and integrated into contracts and other types of …
blocks PR PROTECT
blocks PO.1 Define Security Requirements for Software Development
blocks PO.1.2 Identify and document all security requirements for organization-developed software to meet, and maintain the requirements over time.
  • Secure Controls Framework -

    The Secure Controls Framework® (SCF)

    "The SCF is the Common Controls Framework™ (CCF), the world's most comprehensive cybersecurity and data privacy metaframework - it is also free to use. The entire concept is building secure, compliant and resilient capabilities in the most efficient and cost-effective manner possible.

    The SCF is more than just a unified control catalog, since its included content creates a playbook for Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) capabilities. Used globally by organizations of every size, the SCF is a robust and scalable solution for security, compliance and resilience controls. As a comprehensive security framework, the SCF maps 1,400+ controls across 200+ laws, regulations, and industry frameworks so you can implement once and comply everywhere.

    Like it or not, cybersecurity is a protracted war on an asymmetric battlefield, where the threats are everywhere and as defenders we have to make the effort to work together to help improve cybersecurity and data privacy practices, since we all suffer when massive data breaches occur or when cyber attacks have physical impacts. Hackers share information on attack methods with other hackers, so why shouldn’t the good guys share information on how to best protect an organization? We decided to take action and make a difference, since we feel it is too important to wait for someone else to fix the problems that exist.

    The SCF is made up of volunteers, mainly specialists within the cybersecurity profession, who focus on GRC and the cybersecurity side of data privacy. These are auditors, engineers, architects, incident responders, consultants and other specialists who live and breathe these topics on a daily basis. The end product is "expert-derived content" that makes up the SCF." https://securecontrolsframework.com/ 

    Terms & Conditions

    The SCF End User License Agreement (EULA) governs the use of the Secure Controls Framework® (SCF) under the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License.