+Relation between interconnectedness through control and interconnectedness through economic dependency
---+dependency)
---+dependency)
---+Scenario C/E 3: Downstream contagion
---+Scenario C/E 4: Upstream contagion

Relation between interconnectedness through control and interconnectedness through economic dependency

Scenario C/E 1: Combined occurrence of control and economic dependency (one-way

1. Yleiskatsaus

,
Otsikko Sääntely
dependency)

In the following scenario, the reporting institution has exposures to all entities shown in the diagram below. A controls A1 and A2 , B controls B1 . Furthermore, B1 is economically dependent on A2 (one-way dependency):

Grouping requirement: In this scenario, the reporting institution should come to the conclusion that B1 is in any case to be included in the group of connected clients of A (the group thus consisting of A, A1 , A2 and B1 ) as well as of B (the group thus consisting of B and B1 ):

In case of financial problems for A, A2 and ultimately B1 will also experience financial difficulties on account of their legal (A2 ) and economic (B1 ) dependency respectively. The forming of three different groups (A + A1 + A2 , A2 + B1 , B + B1 ) would not be sufficient to capture the risk stemming from A, because B1 , although dependent on A2 and thus on A itself, would be carved out of the single risk of group A.

Scenario C/E 2: Combined occurrence of control and economic dependency (two-way

dependency)

In this scenario, the economic dependency of A2 and B1 is not only one way but mutual: Grouping requirement: A2 would need to be included additionally in group B, and B1 would need to be included additionally in group A:

Scenario C/E 3: Downstream contagion

In a variation on scenario C/E 1 above, B1 also controls two entities (B2 and B3 ). In this case, the financial difficulties of A will pass through A2 and B1 down to the two subsidiaries of B1 (‘downstream contagion’).

Grouping requirement:

Scenario C/E 4: Upstream contagion

The control relationship between B and B1 does not automatically lead to including B in the group of connected clients of A, as financial problems for A are not likely to result in financial difficulties for B. However, the controlling entity B needs to be included in the group of A if B1 forms such an important part of group B that B is economically dependent on B1 . In this case, the financial difficulties of A will proceed not only downwards but also upwards to B, causing payment difficulties for B (i.e. all entities now form a single risk).

Grouping requirement:

1.1 Viittaukset

1.2 Tunnistetut vaatimukset

1.3 Liittyvät standardit

2. Tunnistetut vaatimukset

Vaatimukset
Lähde Vaatimus

3. Liittyvät standardit

Standardit
Lähde Vaatimus
  • EBA -

    EN: Guidelines and other publications of the European Banking Authority (EBA), https://www.eba.europa.eu/. © European Banking Authority. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged (EBA legal notice). Divided into sections and converted into the GRCA format, the wording unchanged. Only the versions published by the EBA are authoritative.

    DE: Leitlinien und weitere Veröffentlichungen der Europäischen Bankenaufsichtsbehörde (EBA), https://www.eba.europa.eu/. © European Banking Authority. Wiedergabe mit Quellenangabe gestattet (Rechtlicher Hinweis der EBA). In Abschnitte aufgeteilt und in das GRCA-Format umgewandelt, der Wortlaut unverändert. Maßgeblich sind allein die von der EBA veröffentlichten Fassungen.