13. Competent authorities should consider the SREP an ongoing process that integrates the outcome …

Competent authorities should consider the SREP an ongoing process that integrates the outcome of all the supervisory activities and all available sources of information into a comprehensive supervisory overview of an institution. The SREP should include consideration of the following:

• a. the outcome of previous SREP assessments, business model analysis and ongoing off-site supervision;
• b. i nstitution’s financial reporting, strategic plan(s), regulatory reporting (common reporting – COREP, financial reporting – FINREP, and credit register, where available) and internal reporting (e.g. management information, capital and liquidity reporting, internal risk reports);
• c. i nstitution’s ICAAP/ILAAP and recovery planning arrangements;
• d. on-site inspections;
• e. internal model assessments;
• f. targeted deep-dive analysis;
• g. horizontal thematic reviews;
• h. stress testing analysis;
• i. third-party reports (e.g. audit reports, reports by equity/credit analysts);
• j. other relevant sectoral or macroeconomic studies/surveys.

2.1.1. Categorisation of institutions

1. Yleiskatsaus

1.1 Viittaukset

1.2 Tunnistetut vaatimukset

1.3 Liittyvät standardit

2. Tunnistetut vaatimukset

3. Liittyvät standardit

• EBA - Published by the European Banking Authority at https://www.eba.europa.eu/