148. Competent authorities should periodically review whether their AML/CFT RBS Model delivers the …

Competent authorities should periodically review whether their AML/CFT RBS Model delivers the intended outcome and, in particular, whether the level of supervisory resources remains commensurate with the ML/TF risks identified. Competent authorities should use a variety of tools available to them when reviewing and assessing the adequacy and effectiveness of their AML/CFT RBS Model. These tools include, but are not limited to:

•  A1
• a) professional and technical expertise;
•  O
• b) self-assessment questionnaires ;
• c) sample testing of supervisory measures and actions;
• d) new information such as reports and feedback from other competent authorities or relevant AML/CFT authorities,
• e) feedback from financial intelligence units, law enforcement and other national agencies; or
• f) publications by relevant European or international organisations.

1. Vue d’ensemble

1.1 Références

1.2 Exigences identifiées

1.3 Normes associées

2. Exigences identifiées

3. Normes associées

• EBA - Published by the European Banking Authority at https://www.eba.europa.eu/