+Airteagal 4 Litearthacht intleachta saorga
---+Airteagal 4 1.
---+Airteagal 4 2.
---+Airteagal 4 3.

Airteagal 4 Litearthacht intleachta saorga

-

1. Forbhreathnú

,
Airteagal 4 1.
Déanfaidh soláthraithe agus úsáideoirí gairmiúla na gcóras intleachta saorga, a mhéid is féidir, bearta chun tacú le forbairt litearthacht intleachta saorga a áirithiú i measc a bhfoirne agus daoine eile a bhíonn ag déileáil le hoibriú agus úsáid córas intleachta saorga thar a gceann, agus a gcuid eolais theicniúil, taithí, oideachais agus oiliúna agus an comhthéacs ina mbeidh na córais intleachta saorga le húsáid á gcur san áireamh, agus aird á tabhairt ar na daoine nó na grúpaí díobh a n-úsáidfear na córais intleachta saorga orthu. Ní cheanglaítear ar sholáthraithe ná ar úsáideoirí gairmiúla aon leibhéal sonrach litearthacht intleachta saorga a ráthú i gcás aon duine aonair leis an oibleagáid seo.
Airteagal 4 2.
Tacóidh an Coimisiún agus na Ballstáit le hiarrachtaí soláthraithe agus úsáideoirí gairmiúla córas intleachta saorga, go háirithe FBManna, agus éascóidh siad na hiarrachtaí sin, agus a n-oibleagáid faoi mhír 1 den Airteagal seo á comhlíonadh acu. Chun na críche sin, foilseoidh an Coimisiún samplaí praiticiúla maidir le conas na hoibleagáide sin a chomhlíonadh ar an ardán faisnéise aonair dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 62(3), pointe (b).
Airteagal 4 3.
Glacfaidh an Bord moltaí, agus creataí inniúlachta Eorpacha á gcur san áireamh, chun tacú leis an gCoimisiún agus leis na Ballstáit litearthacht intleachta saorga a cheanglaítear faoi mhír 1 a chur chun cinn, lena n-áirítear trí chuspóirí coiteanna a leagan amach.

1.1 Tagairtí

1.2 Ceanglais aitheanta

1.3 Caighdeáin ghaolmhara

2. Ceanglais aitheanta

Ceanglais

3. Caighdeáin ghaolmhara

Caighdeáin
SCF AI & Autonomous Technologies Stakeholder Competencies

Description

Mechanisms exist to ensure Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Autonomous Technologies (AAT)-related operator and practitioner proficiency requirements for AAT are defined, assessed and documented.

Possible Solutions & Considerations

Micro-Small Business (<10 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 1-2

∙ Artificial Intelligence (AI) / autonomous technologies governance program

Small Business (10-49 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 3-4

∙ Artificial Intelligence (AI) / autonomous technologies governance program

Medium Business (50-249 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 5-6

∙ Artificial Intelligence (AI) / autonomous technologies governance program

Large Business (250-999 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 7-8

∙ Artificial Intelligence (AI) / autonomous technologies governance program

Enterprise (> 1,000 staff) / BLS Firm Size Class 9

∙ Artificial Intelligence (AI) / autonomous technologies governance program

SCR-CMM

Level 0 Not Performed

Practices are non-existent, based on the inability to demonstrate an implemented and operational capability. A reasonable person would conclude the control is not being performed.

Level 1 Performed Informally

Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Technology (AAT) domain capabilities are ad hoc and inconsistent. Capability criteria associated with this control may include:
▪ Policies, standards & procedures associated with AAT domain capabilities provide limited coverage due to the depth and breadth of the existing documentation.
▪ AAT-related processes are expected to follow the organization's existing processes (e.g., incident response, asset management, change control and risk assessments).
▪ No formal Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team exists to provide AAT oversight, where the Chief Information Officer (CIO), or similar function, governs technology decisions what is acceptable for AAT within the organization.

Level 2 Planned Tracked

Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Technology (AAT) capabilities are requirements-driven, but are not standardized across the entity (e.g., local/regional level consistency). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with AAT domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with AAT domain capabilities are documented and maintained by process owners.
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity personnel work with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with AAT domain capabilities to address applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD).
▪ Artificial Intelligence (AI)-related controls are primarily administrative and preventative in nature (e.g., policies, standards and procedures & guidelines).
▪ Asset management may be a defined function (e.g., team or department) or assigned as an additional duty to existing IT and/or cybersecurity personnel.

Level 3 Well Defined

Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Technology (AAT) capabilities are standardized across the entity for applicability to People, Processes, Technologies, Data and/or Facilities (PPTDF) to ensure consistency for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with AAT domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with AAT domain capabilities are well-documented and kept current by process owners.
▪ An Artificial Intelligence Governance (AIG) team, or similar function, is appropriately staffed and supported to implement and maintain AAT domain capabilities.
▪ Technology is leveraged to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of AI governance, risk management and compliance operations (e.g., dedicated AI governance platform).
▪ The entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function, works with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with AAT domain capabilities to address Minimum Compliance Requirements (MCR) (e.g., applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements) and Discretionary Security Requirements (DSR) (e.g., entity-required controls).
▪ An implemented and operational capability exists to ensure AAT-related operator and practitioner proficiency requirements for AAT are defined, assessed and documented.

Level 4 Quantitatively Controlled

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ While it may be possible to develop “metrics-driven” capabilities for this control, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.

Level 5 Continuously Improving

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 or Level 4 (if available) criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ Level 5 capabilities should be considered “world-class” where the control builds on Level 4 capabilities, but are continuously improving through Artificial Intelligence (AI) and/or Machine Learning (ML) technologies.
▪ While it may be possible to develop responsive capabilities for this control through the use of AI and/or ML technologies, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.