+Alternative approach for exposures to central governments
---+Scenario CG 1: Alternative approach – partial use
---+Scenario CG 2: Alternative approach – used for all directly dependent entities
---+Scenario CG 3: Alternative approach – applicable on ‘first/second level’, not below
---+Scenario CG 4: ‘Horizontal connections’ on the ‘second level’
|
Alternative approach for exposures to central governments
To illustrate the possible scenarios, the following general scenario is used: the central government directly controls four legal persons (A, B, C and D). Entities A and B themselves have direct control over two subsidiaries each (A1 /A2 , B1 /B2 ). The reporting institution has exposures to the central government and all of the entities shown.
1. Áttekintés
| Megnevezés |
Szabályozás |
|
Scenario CG 1: Alternative approach – partial use
|
The reporting institution could carve out only one group (‘central government/A/all controlled or dependent entities of A’) and keep the general treatment for the rest (‘central government/B, C and D/all controlled or dependent entities of B’):
|
|
Scenario CG 2: Alternative approach – used for all directly dependent entities
|
Scenario CG 2: Alternative approach – used for all directly dependent entities
|
|
Scenario CG 3: Alternative approach – applicable on ‘first/second level’, not below
|
In the scenarios CG1 and CG2, entities A, B, C and D constitute the ‘second level’, i.e. the level directly below the central government (‘first level’). Here, a carve -out from the overall group of connected clients is possible. However, entities A1 , A2 , B1 and B2 are only indirectly connected to the central government. A carve-out on their level is not possible (e.g. both A1 and A2 need to be included in the group ‘central government/A’):
|
|
Scenario CG 4: ‘Horizontal connections’ on the ‘second level’
|
In a variation on the general scenario above, entities A and B are economically dependent (payment difficulties for B would be contagious to A): Assuming that the reporting institution uses the alternative approach only in part, as described in scenario CG 1 above, the following groups of connected clients need to be considered:
|
,
1.1 Hivatkozások
1.2 Azonosított követelmények
1.3 Kapcsolódó szabványok
2. Azonosított követelmények
Követelmények
| Forrás |
Követelmény |
3. Kapcsolódó szabványok
Szabványok
| Forrás |
Követelmény |
- EBA -
EN: Guidelines and other publications of the European Banking Authority (EBA), https://www.eba.europa.eu/. © European Banking Authority. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged (EBA legal notice). Divided into sections and converted into the GRCA format, the wording unchanged. Only the versions published by the EBA are authoritative.
DE: Leitlinien und weitere Veröffentlichungen der Europäischen Bankenaufsichtsbehörde (EBA), https://www.eba.europa.eu/. © European Banking Authority. Wiedergabe mit Quellenangabe gestattet (Rechtlicher Hinweis der EBA). In Abschnitte aufgeteilt und in das GRCA-Format umgewandelt, der Wortlaut unverändert. Maßgeblich sind allein die von der EBA veröffentlichten Fassungen.
|