22. When selecting supervisory measures, competent authorities should identify the full escalation …

When selecting supervisory measures, competent authorities should identify the full escalation path, taking into account the information available, the nature, size and complexity of the institution and the need to ensure timely remediation of identified deficiencies. The selection should be guided by the following considerations, as applicable:

• a. the intended outcome that the measures aim to achieve and, where feasible, the expected timelines for the institution to address the deficiencies;
• b. the severity of the deficiencies and the potential prudential impact of not addressing the issue (i.e. whether it is necessary to address the issue with a specific measure) and whether the deficiencies have already been addressed/covered by other measures;
• c. the demonstrated ability or intention of the institution to remediate to the deficiencies;
• d. whether other measures would achieve the same objective with less of an administrative and financial impact on the institution;
• e. the possibility that risks and vulnerabilities identified may be correlated or self-reinforcing, or both, meriting an increase in the rigorousness of supervisory measures;
• f. any other factors deemed relevant by the competent authorities.

1. Panoramica

1.1 Riferimenti

1.2 Requisiti identificati

1.3 Standard correlati

2. Requisiti identificati

3. Standard correlati

• EBA - Published by the European Banking Authority at https://www.eba.europa.eu/