+10. Title 10. Application of the SREP to cross-border groups
---+461. This title addresses the application of the SREP procedures and methodology as specified in …
---+462. In the SREP, competent authorities should also consider the potential ML/TF risks and risks of …
---+463. When assessing prudential implications of ML/TF risks and risks of non-implementation and …
---+10.1. Application of the SREP to cross-border groups
------+464. When applying the SREP and these guidelines to cross-border groups, competent authorities …
------+465. When these guidelines are applied to the subsidiaries of a cross-border group, competent …
------+466. The results of any such initial assessment of the SREP elements, including, if identified …
------+467. In accordance with Article 3 of the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 710/2014, prior …
------+468. Following the discussions within the colleges of supervisors and the outcomes of the joint …
------+469. Where a competent authority’s assessment revealed specific deficiencies related to intra-group …
------+470. Competent authorities should discuss and coordinate the following within the colleges of …
------+471. When preparing the summary of the overall SREP assessment for the cross-border group and its …
---+10.2. SREP capital assessment and institution-specific prudential requirements
------+472. The determination of capital adequacy, and related requirements and guidance in accordance …
------+473. For parent or subsidiary institutions of a cross-border group, the application of P2R and …
------+474. In the context of discussions on the adequacy of the level of own funds and determining P2R …
------+475. To determine the TSCR as specified in Title 7, competent authorities should consider the same …
------+476. If the outcome of the supervisory assessment of the risk of excessive leverage for the parent …
------+477. In the context of the discussions on the adequacy of the level of own funds to cover the risk …
------+478. All the relevant information regarding the determination of P2G and P2G-LR for parent or …
---+10.3. SREP liquidity assessment and institution-specific prudential requirements
------+479. The determination of measures to address any significant matters and material findings …
------+480. For Article 113(1)(b) of Directive 2013/36/EU, competent authorities should consider ‘matters’ …
---+10.4. Application of other supervisory measures
------+481. Competent authorities responsible for the supervision of cross-border groups and their …
------+482. Competent authorities responsible for the prudential supervision of entities of a cross-border …

10. Title 10. Application of the SREP to cross-border groups

10. Title 10. Application of the SREP to cross-border groups

1. Apžvalga

,
Pavadinimas Reguliavimas
461. This title addresses the application of the SREP procedures and methodology as specified in …

This title addresses the application of the SREP procedures and methodology as specified in these guidelines in relation to cross-border groups and their entities. It also provides links with the joint assessment and decision process to be carried out pursuant to Article 113 of Directive 2013/36/EU and the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 710/2014.

462. In the SREP, competent authorities should also consider the potential ML/TF risks and risks of …

In the SREP, competent authorities should also consider the potential ML/TF risks and risks of non-implementation and evasion of targeted financial sanctions, taking into account input received from the AML/CFT competent authority of the Member State where a parent undertaking is established as well as AML/CFT supervisors responsible for the AML/CFT supervision of the group’s establishments in different jurisdictions, in particular the assessments of ML/TF risks, material weaknesses and breaches of AML/CFT legislation that are linked to the cross-border banking group structure.

463. When assessing prudential implications of ML/TF risks and risks of non-implementation and …

When assessing prudential implications of ML/TF risks and risks of non-implementation and evasion of targeted financial sanctions in the SREP for a cross-border group, competent authorities should leverage the information obtained through bilateral engagements with relevant AML/CFT competent authorities in accordance with the AML/CFT Cooperation Guidelines and through their participation in AML/CFT colleges59 and prudential colleges.


59 AML/CFT colleges as defined in the Joint guidelines on cooperation and information exchange for the purpose of Directive (EU) 2015/849 between competent authorities supervising credit and financial institutions (‘The AML/CFT Colleges Guidelines’ and in Article 2(8) of Directive (EU) 2024/1640.

10.1. Application of the SREP to cross-border groups

10.1. Application of the SREP to cross-border groups

10.2. SREP capital assessment and institution-specific prudential requirements

10.2. SREP capital assessment and institution-specific prudential requirements

10.3. SREP liquidity assessment and institution-specific prudential requirements

10.3. SREP liquidity assessment and institution-specific prudential requirements

10.4. Application of other supervisory measures

10.4. Application of other supervisory measures

1.1 Nuorodos

1.2 Nustatyti reikalavimai

1.3 Susiję standartai

2. Nustatyti reikalavimai

Reikalavimai
Šaltinis Reikalavimas

3. Susiję standartai

Standartai
Šaltinis Reikalavimas
  • EBA - Published by the European Banking Authority at https://www.eba.europa.eu/