+V11 Cryptography
---+V11.1 Cryptographic Inventory and Documentation
------+V11.1.1 Verify that there is a documented policy for management of cryptographic keys and a cryptographic …
------+V11.1.2 Verify that a cryptographic inventory is performed, maintained, regularly updated, and includes all …
------+V11.1.3 Verify that cryptographic discovery mechanisms are employed to identify all instances of …
------+V11.1.4 Verify that a cryptographic inventory is maintained. This must include a documented plan that …
---+V11.2 Secure Cryptography Implementation
------+V11.2.1 Verify that industry-validated implementations (including libraries and hardware-accelerated …
------+V11.2.2 Verify that the application is designed with crypto agility such that random number, authenticated …
------+V11.2.3 Verify that all cryptographic primitives utilize a minimum of 128-bits of security based on the …
------+V11.2.4 Verify that all cryptographic operations are constant-time, with no 'short-circuit' operations in …
------+V11.2.5 Verify that all cryptographic modules fail securely, and errors are handled in a way that does not …
---+V11.3 Encryption Algorithms
------+V11.3.1 Verify that insecure block modes (e.g., ECB) and weak padding schemes (e.g., PKCS#1 v1.5) are not …
------+V11.3.2 Verify that only approved ciphers and modes such as AES with GCM are used.
------+V11.3.3 Verify that encrypted data is protected against unauthorized modification preferably by using an …
------+V11.3.4 Verify that nonces, initialization vectors, and other single-use numbers are not used for more than …
------+V11.3.5 Verify that any combination of an encryption algorithm and a MAC algorithm is operating in …
---+V11.4 Hashing and Hash-based Functions
------+V11.4.1 Verify that only approved hash functions are used for general cryptographic use cases, including …
------+V11.4.2 Verify that passwords are stored using an approved, computationally intensive, key derivation …
------+V11.4.3 Verify that hash functions used in digital signatures, as part of data authentication or data …
------+V11.4.4 Verify that the application uses approved key derivation functions with key stretching parameters …
---+V11.5 Random Values
------+V11.5.1 Verify that all random numbers and strings which are intended to be non-guessable must be generated …
------+V11.5.2 Verify that the random number generation mechanism in use is designed to work securely, even under …
---+V11.6 Public Key Cryptography
------+V11.6.1 Verify that only approved cryptographic algorithms and modes of operation are used for key …
------+V11.6.2 Verify that approved cryptographic algorithms are used for key exchange (such as Diffie-Hellman) …
---+V11.7 In-Use Data Cryptography
------+V11.7.1 Verify that full memory encryption is in use that protects sensitive data while it is in use …
------+V11.7.2 Verify that data minimization ensures the minimal amount of data is exposed during processing, and …
|
V11 Cryptography
Control ObjectiveThe objective of this chapter is to define best practices for the general use of cryptography, as well as to instill a fundamental understanding of cryptographic principles and inspire a shift toward more resilient and modern approaches. It encourages the following: - Implementing robust cryptographic systems that fail securely, adapt to evolving threats, and are future-proof.
- Utilizing cryptographic mechanisms that are both secure and aligned with industry best practices.
- Maintaining a secure cryptographic key management system with appropriate access controls and auditing.
- Regularly evaluating the cryptographic landscape to assess new risks and adapt algorithms accordingly.
- Discovering and managing cryptographic use cases throughout the application's lifecycle to ensure that all cryptographic assets are accounted for and secured.
In addition to outlining general principles and best practices, this document also provides more in-depth technical information about the requirements in Appendix C - Cryptography Standards. This includes algorithms and modes that are considered "approved" for the purposes of the requirements in this chapter. Requirements that use cryptography to solve a separate problem, such as secrets management or communications security, will be in different parts of the standard. ReferencesFor more information, see also:
1. Pārskats
| Nosaukums |
Standarts |
|
V11.1 Cryptographic Inventory and Documentation
|
Applications need to be designed with strong cryptographic architecture to protect data assets according to their classification. Encrypting everything is wasteful; not encrypting anything is legally negligent. A balance must be struck, usually during architectural or high-level design, design sprints, or architectural spikes. Designing cryptography "on the fly" or retrofitting it will inevitably cost much more to implement securely than simply building it in from the start. It is important to ensure that all cryptographic assets are regularly discovered, inventoried, and assessed. Please see the appendix for more information on how this can be done. The need to future-proof cryptographic systems against the eventual rise of quantum computing is also critical. Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) refers to cryptographic algorithms designed to remain secure against attacks by quantum computers, which are expected to break widely used algorithms such as RSA and elliptic curve cryptography (ECC). Please see the appendix for current guidance on vetted PQC primitives and standards.
|
|
V11.2 Secure Cryptography Implementation
|
This section defines the requirements for the selection, implementation, and ongoing management of core cryptographic algorithms for an application. The objective is to ensure that only robust, industry-accepted cryptographic primitives are deployed, in alignment with current standards (e.g., NIST, ISO/IEC) and best practices. Organizations must ensure that each cryptographic component is selected based on peer-reviewed evidence and practical security testing.
|
|
V11.3 Encryption Algorithms
|
Authenticated encryption algorithms built on AES and CHACHA20 form the backbone of modern cryptographic practice.
|
|
V11.4 Hashing and Hash-based Functions
|
Cryptographic hashes are used in a wide variety of cryptographic protocols, such as digital signatures, HMAC, key derivation functions (KDF), random bit generation, and password storage. The security of the cryptographic system is only as strong as the underlying hash functions used. This section outlines the requirements for using secure hash functions in cryptographic operations. For password storage, as well as the cryptography appendix, the OWASP Password Storage Cheat Sheet will also provide useful context and guidance.
|
|
V11.5 Random Values
|
Cryptographically secure Pseudo-random Number Generation (CSPRNG) is incredibly difficult to get right. Generally, good sources of entropy within a system will be quickly depleted if over-used, but sources with less randomness can lead to predictable keys and secrets.
|
|
V11.6 Public Key Cryptography
|
Public Key Cryptography will be used where it is not possible or not desirable to share a secret key between multiple parties. As part of this, there exists a need for approved key exchange mechanisms, such as Diffie-Hellman and Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) to ensure that the cryptosystem remains secure against modern threats. The "Secure Communication" chapter provides requirements for TLS so the requirements in this section are intended for situations where Public Key Cryptography is being used in use cases other than TLS.
|
|
V11.7 In-Use Data Cryptography
|
Protecting data while it is being processed is paramount. Techniques such as full memory encryption, encryption of data in transit, and ensuring data is encrypted as quickly as possible after use is recommended.
|
1.1 Atsauces
1.2 Identificētās prasības
1.3 Saistītie tiesību akti
2. Identificētās prasības
3. Saistītie tiesību akti
Tiesību akti
| Avots |
Regulējums |
- OWASP -
EN: Publications of the OWASP Foundation, https://owasp.org/. OWASP® is a registered trademark of the OWASP Foundation, Inc.; GRCA is not affiliated with, nor endorsed by, the OWASP Foundation. Only the versions published by OWASP are authoritative. - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard (ASVS) 5.0.0, May 2025, from OWASP/ASVS: © 2008-2025 The OWASP Foundation, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Changes: divided into sections and converted into the GRCA format, the wording unchanged. These adaptations are shared under CC BY-SA 4.0 as well.
- OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard (MASVS) v2.1.0, January 2024, from OWASP/masvs: © The OWASP Foundation, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Changes: converted into the GRCA format, the wording unchanged. These adaptations are shared under CC BY-SA 4.0 as well.
- OWASP Mobile Application Security Weakness Enumeration (MASWE) v1.0.0, August 2026, from OWASP/maswe: © The OWASP Foundation, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Changes: converted into the GRCA format, the wording unchanged, linked to the MASVS controls they map to. These adaptations are shared under CC BY-SA 4.0 as well.
- OWASP Mobile Application Security Testing Guide (MASTG) v2.0.0, June 2026, from OWASP/mastg: © The OWASP Foundation, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. The tests and best practices only, without code samples, images, tools or apps. Changes: converted into the GRCA format, the wording unchanged; references to other pages of the MASTG as links to mas.owasp.org; the weakness of each test in the numbering of MASWE v1 and linked to it. These adaptations are shared under CC BY-SA 4.0 as well.
- OWASP Software Assurance Maturity Model (SAMM) v2.2.0, July 2026, from owaspsamm/core: © The OWASP Foundation, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Changes: converted into the GRCA format, the wording unchanged; short codes (G-SM-1-A) built from the model, the assessment questions as assessment procedures of their activities. These adaptations are shared under CC BY-SA 4.0 as well.
- OWASP Top 10:2025, from OWASP/Top10: © 2003-2025 The OWASP® Foundation, Inc., licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. The ten categories, without the icons. Changes: converted into the GRCA format, the wording unchanged. These adaptations are shared under CC BY-SA 4.0 as well. The names of the mapped CWEs (Common Weakness Enumeration): © 2006–2026 The MITRE Corporation. License: The MITRE Corporation hereby grants you a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use CWE for research, development, and commercial purposes. Any copy you make for such purposes is authorized on the condition that you reproduce MITRE’s copyright designation and this license in any such copy. See the CWE Terms of Use. CWE™ is a trademark of The MITRE Corporation.
DE: Veröffentlichungen der OWASP Foundation, https://owasp.org/. OWASP® ist eine eingetragene Marke der OWASP Foundation, Inc.; GRCA steht in keiner Verbindung zur OWASP Foundation und wird von ihr nicht unterstützt. Maßgeblich sind allein die von OWASP veröffentlichten Fassungen. - OWASP Application Security Verification Standard (ASVS) 5.0.0, Mai 2025, aus OWASP/ASVS: © 2008-2025 The OWASP Foundation, lizenziert unter CC BY-SA 4.0. Änderungen: in Abschnitte aufgeteilt und in das GRCA-Format umgewandelt, der Wortlaut unverändert. Diese Bearbeitungen stehen ebenfalls unter CC BY-SA 4.0.
- OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard (MASVS) v2.1.0, Januar 2024, aus OWASP/masvs: © The OWASP Foundation, lizenziert unter CC BY-SA 4.0. Änderungen: in das GRCA-Format umgewandelt, der Wortlaut unverändert. Diese Bearbeitungen stehen ebenfalls unter CC BY-SA 4.0.
- OWASP Mobile Application Security Weakness Enumeration (MASWE) v1.0.0, August 2026, aus OWASP/maswe: © The OWASP Foundation, lizenziert unter CC BY-SA 4.0. Änderungen: in das GRCA-Format umgewandelt, der Wortlaut unverändert, mit den MASVS-Controls verknüpft, denen sie zugeordnet sind. Diese Bearbeitungen stehen ebenfalls unter CC BY-SA 4.0.
- OWASP Mobile Application Security Testing Guide (MASTG) v2.0.0, Juni 2026, aus OWASP/mastg: © The OWASP Foundation, lizenziert unter CC BY-SA 4.0. Nur die Tests und Best Practices, ohne Codebeispiele, Bilder, Werkzeuge und Apps. Änderungen: in das GRCA-Format umgewandelt, der Wortlaut unverändert; Verweise auf andere Seiten des MASTG als Links zu mas.owasp.org; die Schwachstelle jedes Tests in der Nummerierung der MASWE v1 und mit ihr verknüpft. Diese Bearbeitungen stehen ebenfalls unter CC BY-SA 4.0.
- OWASP Software Assurance Maturity Model (SAMM) v2.2.0, Juli 2026, aus owaspsamm/core: © The OWASP Foundation, lizenziert unter CC BY-SA 4.0. Änderungen: in das GRCA-Format umgewandelt, der Wortlaut unverändert; Kürzel (G-SM-1-A) aus dem Modell gebildet, die Assessment-Fragen als Prüfverfahren ihrer Aktivitäten. Diese Bearbeitungen stehen ebenfalls unter CC BY-SA 4.0.
- OWASP Top 10:2025, aus OWASP/Top10: © 2003-2025 The OWASP® Foundation, Inc., lizenziert unter CC BY-SA 4.0. Die zehn Kategorien, ohne die Symbole. Änderungen: in das GRCA-Format umgewandelt, der Wortlaut unverändert. Diese Bearbeitungen stehen ebenfalls unter CC BY-SA 4.0. Die Namen der zugeordneten CWEs (Common Weakness Enumeration): © 2006–2026 The MITRE Corporation. MITRE erlaubt die Nutzung für Forschung, Entwicklung und kommerzielle Zwecke, wenn jede Kopie den Urheberrechtsvermerk und die Lizenz enthält; maßgeblich ist der englische Wortlaut der Lizenz oben und die CWE Terms of Use. CWE™ ist eine Marke der MITRE Corporation.
|