Assessment Objectives
In addition to relevant policies, standards and procedures, the assessor shall examine, interview, and/or test to determine if appropriately scoped evidence exists to support the claim that:
- MNT-02_A01 a maintenance policy is developed and documented.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01a.[01] - MNT-02_A02 the maintenance policy is disseminated to organization-defined personnel or roles.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01a.[02] - MNT-02_A03 maintenance procedures to facilitate the implementation of the maintenance policy and associated maintenance controls are developed and documented.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01a.[03] - MNT-02_A04 the maintenance procedures are disseminated to organization-defined personnel or roles.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01a.[04] - MNT-02_A05 personnel or roles to whom the maintenance policy is to be disseminated is/are defined.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01_ODP[01] - MNT-02_A06 personnel or roles to whom the maintenance procedures are to be disseminated is/are defined.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01_ODP[02] - MNT-02_A07 one or more of the following organization-defined criteria is/are selected: {organization-level. mission/business process-level. system-level}.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01_ODP[03] - MNT-02_A08 an official to manage the maintenance policy and procedures is defined.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01_ODP[04] - MNT-02_A09 the frequency with which the current maintenance policy is reviewed / updated is defined.
Defined parameters: at least annually
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01_ODP[05] - MNT-02_A10 events that would require the current maintenance policy to be reviewed / updated are defined.
Defined parameters: significant changes
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01_ODP[06] - MNT-02_A11 the frequency with which the current maintenance procedures are reviewed / updated is defined.
Defined parameters: at least annually
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01_ODP[07] - MNT-02_A12 events that would require the maintenance procedures to be reviewed / updated are defined.
Defined parameters: significant changes
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01_ODP[08] - MNT-02_A13 the organization's maintenance policy addresses purpose.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01a.01(a)[01] - MNT-02_A14 the organization's maintenance policy addresses scope.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01a.01(a)[02] - MNT-02_A15 the organization's maintenance policy addresses roles.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01a.01(a)[03] - MNT-02_A16 the organization's maintenance policy addresses responsibilities.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01a.01(a)[04] - MNT-02_A17 the organization's maintenance policy addresses management commitment.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01a.01(a)[05] - MNT-02_A18 the organization's maintenance policy addresses coordination among organizational entities.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01a.01(a)[06] - MNT-02_A19 the organization's maintenance policy addresses compliance.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01a.01(a)[07] - MNT-02_A20 the organization's maintenance policy is consistent with applicable laws, Executive Orders, directives, regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01a.01(b) - MNT-02_A21 the organization-defined official is designated to manage the development, documentation, and dissemination of the maintenance policy and procedures.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01b. - MNT-02_A22 the current maintenance policy is reviewed / updated organization-defined frequency.
Defined parameters: at least annually
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01c.01[01] - MNT-02_A23 the current maintenance policy is reviewed / updated following organization-defined events.
Defined parameters: significant changes
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01c.01[02] - MNT-02_A24 the current maintenance procedures are reviewed / updated organization-defined frequency.
Defined parameters: at least annually
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01c.02[01] - MNT-02_A25 the current maintenance procedures are reviewed / updated following organization-defined events.
Defined parameters: significant changes
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_MA-01c.02[02] - MNT-02_A26 maintenance management operations are conducted according to documented policies, standards, procedures and/or other organizational directives.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: SCF Created - MNT-02_A27 resources (e.g., people, processes, technologies, data and/or facilities) required to support maintenance management operations are identified and provided.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: SCF Created - MNT-02_A28 responsibility and authority for the performance of maintenance management-related activities are assigned to designated personnel.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: SCF Created - MNT-02_A29 personnel performing maintenance management-related activities have the skills and knowledge needed to perform their assigned duties.
Assessment rigor: 2
Origin: SCF Created
Saistītie uzdevumi
| Saites veids | Uzdevums |
|---|---|
| blocks | Maintenance Operations |
- Secure Controls Framework -
The Secure Controls Framework® (SCF)
"The SCF is the Common Controls Framework™ (CCF), the world's most comprehensive cybersecurity and data privacy metaframework - it is also free to use. The entire concept is building secure, compliant and resilient capabilities in the most efficient and cost-effective manner possible.
The SCF is more than just a unified control catalog, since its included content creates a playbook for Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) capabilities. Used globally by organizations of every size, the SCF is a robust and scalable solution for security, compliance and resilience controls. As a comprehensive security framework, the SCF maps 1,400+ controls across 200+ laws, regulations, and industry frameworks so you can implement once and comply everywhere.
Like it or not, cybersecurity is a protracted war on an asymmetric battlefield, where the threats are everywhere and as defenders we have to make the effort to work together to help improve cybersecurity and data privacy practices, since we all suffer when massive data breaches occur or when cyber attacks have physical impacts. Hackers share information on attack methods with other hackers, so why shouldn’t the good guys share information on how to best protect an organization? We decided to take action and make a difference, since we feel it is too important to wait for someone else to fix the problems that exist.
The SCF is made up of volunteers, mainly specialists within the cybersecurity profession, who focus on GRC and the cybersecurity side of data privacy. These are auditors, engineers, architects, incident responders, consultants and other specialists who live and breathe these topics on a daily basis. The end product is "expert-derived content" that makes up the SCF." https://securecontrolsframework.com/Terms & Conditions
The SCF End User License Agreement (EULA) governs the use of the Secure Controls Framework® (SCF) under the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License.