+OPS.1.1.4 Protection Against Malware
---+OPS.1.1.4.G1. Software Vulnerabilities and Drive-By Downloads
---+OPS.1.1.4.G2. Extortion through Ransomware
---+OPS.1.1.4.G3. Targeted Attacks and Social Engineering
---+OPS.1.1.4.G4. Botnets
---+OPS.1.1.4.G5. Infection of Production Systems and IoT Devices
---+OPS.1.1.4.A1 Creating a Malware Protection Concept (B)
---+OPS.1.1.4.A2 Using System-Specific Protection Mechanisms (B)
---+OPS.1.1.4.A3 Selection of a Virus Protection Program (B)
---+OPS.1.1.4.A5 Operation and Configuration of Virus Protection Programs (B)
---+OPS.1.1.4.A6 Regular Updating of Virus Protection Programs and Signatures (B)
---+OPS.1.1.4.A7 User Awareness and Obligations [User] (B)
---+OPS.1.1.4.A9 Reporting Malware Infections [User] (S)
---+OPS.1.1.4.A10 Using Special Analysis Environments (H)
---+OPS.1.1.4.A11 Using Several Scan Engines (H)
---+OPS.1.1.4.A12 Using Storage Media Locks (H)
---+OPS.1.1.4.A13 Handling Untrusted Files (H)
---+OPS.1.1.4.A14 Selecting and Using Cyber Security Products to Thwart Targeted Attacks (H)
|
OPS.1.1.4 Protection Against Malware
IntroductionMalware refers to programs that perform harmful functions on an IT system, usually without the knowledge or consent of the user. These harmful functions can have a wide range of purposes, ranging from potential espionage and extortion (using ransomware) to the sabotage and destruction of information, or even devices. In principle, malware can be implemented on all operating systems and IT systems. In addition to traditional IT systems such as clients and servers, this includes mobile devices such as smartphones. Today, network components like routers and industrial control systems—and even IoT devices such as networked cameras—are also frequently threatened by malware. On classic IT systems, malware is distributed mainly via e-mail attachments, manipulated web pages (drive-by downloads), or storage media. Smartphones are usually infected via the installation of malicious apps, but drive-by downloads are also possible. Furthermore, open network interfaces, incorrect configurations, and software vulnerabilities are frequent points of entry on all IT systems. This module uses the term “virus protection program”. Here, “viruses” are a synonym for all types of malware. A virus protection program therefore refers to a program for protecting against any type of malware. ObjectiveThis module describes the requirements that must be met and implemented to protect an organisation effectively against malware. Scoping and ModellingModule OPS.1.1.4 Protection Against Malware must be applied once to the entire information domain under consideration. This module describes the general requirements for protection against malware. Specific requirements for protecting particular IT systems in an organisation against malware are included in the relevant modules, particularly in the SYS layer IT Systems. If identified malware results in a security incident, the requirements of module DER.2.1 Security Incident Handling should be considered. The requirements of module DER.2.3 Clean-Up of Extensive Security Incidents help in removing identified malware and re-establishing a cleaned state. The virus protection programs used within the framework of this module should also be taken into account in patch and change management (OPS.1.1.3 Patch and Change Management). Furthermore, the topic of protection against malware should be taken into account in the context of the modules ORP.3 Information Security Awareness and Training and CON.3 Backup Concept. Useful ResourcesThe International Organization for Standardization (ISO) provides guidelines for protection against malware in the standard ISO/IEC 27001:2013, in particular in annex A, A.12.2 (“Protection from Malware”). The Information Security Forum (ISF) provides guidelines for protection from malware in “The Standard of Good Practice for Information Security”, in particular in area TS1 ("Security Solutions").
1. Ħarsa ġenerali
| Titlu |
Standard |
|
OPS.1.1.4.A1 Creating a Malware Protection Concept (B)
|
A concept that describes which IT systems must be protected against malware MUST be drawn up. It MUST include IoT devices and production systems. Furthermore, it MUST be specified how protection is to be implemented. If no reliable protection is possible, the identified IT systems SHOULD NOT be operated. The concept SHOULD be documented in a comprehensible manner and kept up to date.
|
|
OPS.1.1.4.A2 Using System-Specific Protection Mechanisms (B)
|
The protection mechanisms provided by the IT systems used, as well as by the operating systems and applications used on them, MUST be checked. Such mechanisms MUST be used unless there is at least an equal substitute or good reasons against their use. If they are not used, this MUST be explained and documented.
|
|
OPS.1.1.4.A3 Selection of a Virus Protection Program (B)
|
A program MUST be selected and installed for the specific purpose of virus protection depending on the operating system used, the other protection mechanisms present, and the availability of suitable virus protection programs. A suitable virus protection program MUST be selected and installed for gateways and IT systems used for data exchange. The products used MUST be designed for enterprise environments and include services and support that are tailored to the needs of the organisation in question. Products for purely home-based users or products without manufacturer support MUST NOT be used for professional production operations. Cloud services designed to improve the detection performance of virus protection programs SHOULD be used. If the cloud functions of such products are used, it MUST be ensured that there are no conflicts regarding data or confidentiality protection. In addition to real-time and on-demand scans, it MUST also be possible to scan compromised and encrypted data for malware with the solution chosen.
|
|
OPS.1.1.4.A5 Operation and Configuration of Virus Protection Programs (B)
|
Virus protection programs MUST be configured appropriately for their operational environment. The focus SHOULD be on detection performance unless data protection or performance reasons influence this in individual cases. If the security-relevant functions of a virus protection program are not used, this SHOULD be explained and documented. In the case of protection programs that are specially optimised for desktop virtualisation, it SHOULD be transparently documented whether certain detection procedures have been omitted in favour of performance. Care MUST be taken to ensure that users are not able to make any security-related changes to the settings of anti-virus programs.
|
|
OPS.1.1.4.A6 Regular Updating of Virus Protection Programs and Signatures (B)
|
The scan engines and malware signatures of virus protection programs MUST be updated regularly and promptly on the corresponding IT systems.
|
|
OPS.1.1.4.A7 User Awareness and Obligations [User] (B)
|
Users MUST be informed regularly of the threats posed by malware. They MUST comply with the basic codes of conduct at hand to reduce the risk of malware infection. Files, e-mails, websites, and other content from untrusted sources SHOULD NOT be opened. Users MUST be aware of the appropriate persons to contact in the event of a suspected malware infection. Users MUST inform their designated contacts if they suspect an infection involving a malicious program.
|
|
OPS.1.1.4.A9 Reporting Malware Infections [User] (S)
|
The virus protection program used SHOULD block and report malware infections automatically. These automatic reports SHOULD be sent to a central location. The employees responsible SHOULD then decide how to proceed based on the current situation. The procedure to be followed in case of reports and alarms from virus protection programs SHOULD be planned, documented, and tested. In particular, the actions to be taken in case of a confirmed infection SHOULD be specified.
|
|
OPS.1.1.4.A10 Using Special Analysis Environments (H)
|
Automated analyses in a special test environment (based on sandboxes, or separate virtual or physical systems) SHOULD also be used for assessing suspicious data.
|
|
OPS.1.1.4.A11 Using Several Scan Engines (H)
|
To improve detection performance, virus protection programs with several alternative scan engines SHOULD be used for IT systems that require special protection (e.g. gateways and IT systems for data exchange).
|
|
OPS.1.1.4.A12 Using Storage Media Locks (H)
|
Before connecting storage media from third parties to the IT systems of an organisation, the media SHOULD be checked in a storage media lock.
|
|
OPS.1.1.4.A13 Handling Untrusted Files (H)
|
If it is necessary to open untrusted files, this SHOULD only be done on an isolated IT system. In this system, the corresponding files SHOULD be converted into a secure format or printed (for example) if doing so will reduce the risk of a malware infection.
|
|
OPS.1.1.4.A14 Selecting and Using Cyber Security Products to Thwart Targeted Attacks (H)
|
The use and added value of products and services that offer an extended scope of protection compared to conventional anti-virus programs SHOULD be examined. Security products like these SHOULD be used against targeted attacks, such as when running files in special analysis environments, hardening clients, or encapsulating processes. Before a decision is taken to purchase a particular security product, the effectiveness of its protection and its compatibility with the IT environment of the organisation in question SHOULD be tested.
|
1.1 Referenzi
1.2 Rekwiżiti identifikati
1.3 Regolamenti relatati
2. Rekwiżiti identifikati
3. Regolamenti relatati
Regolamenti
| Sors |
Regolamentazzjoni |
Kwistjonijiet marbuta
|