|
+3.15.2 Uses of Trusted Referees |
3.15.2 Uses of Trusted RefereesTrusted referees offer a critical path for those who are unable to complete identity proofing by other means. However, given the number of possible failures that may occur within the proofing process, it is essential for CSPs to define the uses for which a trusted referee can be applied within their own service offerings. The following requirements apply to defining the integration of trusted referees into the identity proofing process: CSPs SHALL document which types of exceptions and failures are eligible for the use of a trusted referee.
CSPs SHOULD offer trusted referee services for failures of automated verification processes (e.g., biometric comparisons).
CSPs SHOULD offer trusted referee services for failures in completing automated validation processes, such as mismatched core attributes or the absence of the applicant in a record source. If a CSP offers trusted referees for this purpose, the following requirements apply:
CSPs SHALL provide a policy for additional evidence types that may be used to corroborate core attributes or changes in core attributes.
Trusted referees SHALL review additional evidence types for authenticity to the greatest degree allowed by the evidence.
If no authoritative or credible records are available to support validation, the trusted referee MAY compare the attributes on additional pieces of evidence with the strongest piece of evidence available to corroborate the consistency of core attributes.
If there is a partial mismatch of core attributes to authoritative records, the trusted referee SHALL review evidence that supports the legitimacy of the asserted attribute value (e.g., recent move or change of name).
1. Przegląd
1.1 Odwołania1.2 Zidentyfikowane wymagania1.3 Powiązane regulacje2. Zidentyfikowane wymagania
3. Powiązane regulacje
|