+2. Title 2. SREP framework
---+2.1. Overview of the SREP framework
------+12. Competent authorities should have a comprehensive SREP framework covering the following …
------+13. Competent authorities should consider the SREP an ongoing process that integrates the outcome …
------+14. Competent authorities should categorise all institutions under their supervisory remit into …
------+15. Within a group of entities, if competent authorities determine that the relevance of different …
------+16. Competent authorities should review the categorisation of their institutions periodically, and …
------+17. To ensure a minimum level of comparability, competent authorities should refer to the …
------+18. Competent authorities should continuously assess the risks to which the institution is or might …
------+19. Competent authorities should ensure that the findings of their assessments are clearly …
------+20. As part of their ongoing supervisory activities, competent authorities should undertake …
------+21. The framework referred to in the previous paragraph should consider the following actions …
------+22. When selecting supervisory measures, competent authorities should identify the full escalation …
------+23. Without prejudice to the discretion of the competent authorities in selecting the most …
------+24. The provisions of this title are without prejudice to the possibility of competent authorities …
------+25. Competent authorities should engage in dialogue with institutions as they perform their …
------+26. Competent authorities should communicate the outcomes of the SREP assessment to the institution …
---+2.2. Scoring in the SREP
------+27. Competent authorities should apply a consistent scoring system to help facilitate communication …
------+28. When assigning risk scores, SREP elements scores and the overall SREP score, competent …
------+29. The risk scores aim to capture the likelihood that the risks to capital, liquidity and funding …
------+30. The scores are: 1 (low risk), 2 (medium-low risk), 3 (medium-high risk), and 4 (high risk – …
------+31. Competent authorities should review the scores upon completion of the SREP assessments with the …
------+32. Risk scores are assigned to summarise risks to capital (as specified in Title 6). These scores …
------+33. Competent authorities should determine the risk score through an assessment of an institution’s …
------+34. When assessing risks to capital, competent authorities should also consider relevant …
------+35. Competent authorities may use different methods to apply the risk scores, they could score …
------+36. At the end of the overall SREP assessment, competent authorities should form a comprehensive …
------+37. Capital adequacy and liquidity and funding adequacy represent the supervisory view of the …
------+38. The final score is an overall SREP score. This incorporates the four SREP element scores above …
------+39. Competent authorities should ensure that the SREP element scores and the overall SREP score: a. …
---+2.3. Organisational arrangements
------+40. Competent authorities should ensure that their organisational arrangements for conducting SREP …
------+41. When defining arrangements for dialogue with institutions, competent authorities should …
---+2.4. Proportionality and supervisory engagement
------+42. Competent authorities should adjust the scope, frequency, granularity and intensity of …
------+43. Under this model, competent authorities should form a view on all the SREP elements (business …
------+44. This view should be based on information gathered through the full range of supervisory …
------+45. Competent authorities should engage with the institutions’ management body and senior …
------+46. Where institutions are part of cross-border groups, competent authorities should discuss how …
------+47. Where competent authorities determine that institutions have similar risk profiles or may be …
------+48. For institutions covered by the supervisory examination programme required by Article 99 of …
------+49. When planning supervisory activities, competent authorities should coordinate activities …

2. Title 2. SREP framework

2. Title 2. SREP framework

1. Prezentare generală

,
2.1. Overview of the SREP framework

2.1. Overview of the SREP framework
2.2. Scoring in the SREP

2.2. Scoring in the SREP
2.3. Organisational arrangements

2.3. Organisational arrangements
2.4. Proportionality and supervisory engagement

2.4. Proportionality and supervisory engagement

1.1 Referințe

1.2 Cerințe identificate

1.3 Standarde asociate

2. Cerințe identificate

Cerințe

3. Standarde asociate

Standarde
  • EBA - Published by the European Banking Authority at https://www.eba.europa.eu/