+3.1 Requirements by Authenticator Type
---+3.1.1 Passwords
------+3.1.1.1 Password Authenticators
------+3.1.1.2 Password Verifiers
---+3.1.2 Look-Up Secrets
------+3.1.2.1 Look-Up Secret Authenticators
------+3.1.2.2 Look-Up Secret Verifiers
---+3.1.3 Out-of-Band Devices
------+3.1.3.1 Out-of-Band Authenticators
------+3.1.3.2 Out-of-Band Verifiers
------+3.1.3.3 Authentication Using the Public Switched Telephone Network
------+3.1.3.4 Multi-Factor Out-of-Band Authenticators
---+3.1.4 Single-Factor OTP
------+3.1.4.1 Single-Factor OTP Authenticators
------+3.1.4.2 Single-Factor OTP Verifiers
---+3.1.5 Multi-Factor OTPs
------+3.1.5.1 Multi-Factor OTP Authenticators
------+3.1.5.2 Multi-Factor OTP Verifiers
---+3.1.6 Single-Factor Cryptographic Authentication
------+3.1.6.1 Single-Factor Cryptographic Authenticators
------+3.1.6.2 Single-Factor Cryptographic Verifiers
---+3.1.7 Multi-Factor Cryptographic Authentication
------+3.1.7.1 Multi-Factor Cryptographic Authenticators
------+3.1.7.2 Multi-Factor Cryptographic Verifiers
------+3.1.7.3 Usage With Subscriber-Controlled Wallets
------+3.1.7.4 Syncable Authenticators
|
3.1 Requirements by Authenticator Type
The following requirements apply to specific authenticator types.
1. Pregled
| Naslov |
Standard |
|
3.1.1 Passwords
|
A password (sometimes referred to as a passphrase or, if numeric, a personal identification number [PIN]) is a secret value intended to be chosen and either memorized or recorded by the subscriber. Passwords must be of sufficient effective strength and secrecy that it would be impractical for an attacker to guess or otherwise discover the correct secret value. A password is “something you know.” The requirements in this section apply to centrally verified passwords that are used as independent authentication factors and sent over an authenticated protected channel to the verifier. Passwords used locally as an activation factor for a multi-factor authenticator (e.g., an unlock PIN) are referred to as activation secrets and discussed in Sec. 3.2.10. In contrast to centrally verified passwords, activation secrets (similar to the unlock passwords or PINs on many devices) are not sent to the verifier and instead used locally to gain access to the authentication secret. Passwords are not phishing-resistant.
|
|
3.1.2 Look-Up Secrets
|
A look-up secret authenticator is a physical or electronic record that stores a set of secrets shared between the claimant and the CSP. The claimant uses the authenticator to look up the appropriate secrets needed to respond to a prompt from the verifier. For example, the verifier could ask a claimant to provide a specific subset of the numeric or character strings printed on a card in table format. A typical application of look-up secrets is for one-time saved recovery codes (see Sec. 4.2.1.1) that the subscriber stores for use if another authenticator is lost or malfunctions. A look-up secret is “something you have.” Look-up secrets are not phishing-resistant.
|
|
3.1.3 Out-of-Band Devices
|
An out-of-band authenticator is a physical device that is uniquely addressable and can communicate securely with the verifier over an independent communications channel, which is referred to as the secondary channel. The device is possessed and controlled by the claimant and supports private communication over this separate secondary channel, which is separate from the primary channel for authentication. An out-of-band authenticator is “something you have.” Examples of out-of-band devices include smartphones equipped with applications that allow the verifier to independently communicate with the subscriber or the use of text messaging or audio calls to communicate with the subscriber. Out-of-band authentication uses a short-term secret generated by the verifier. The secret securely binds the authentication operation on the primary and secondary channels and establishes the claimant’s control of the out-of-band device. Out-of-band authentication is not phishing-resistant. The out-of-band authenticator can operate in one of the following ways:
The claimant transfers a secret received by the out-of-band device via the secondary channel to the verifier using the primary channel. For example, the claimant may receive the secret (typically a 6-digit code) on their mobile device and type it into their authentication session. This method is shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Transfer of secret to primary device 
The claimant transfers a secret received via the primary channel to the out-of-band device for transmission to the verifier via the secondary channel. For example, the claimant may view the secret on their authentication session and either type it into an application on their mobile device or use a technology such as a barcode or QR code to effect the transfer. This method is shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Transfer of secret to out-of-band device 
Note: A third method of out-of-band authentication compares the secrets received from the primary and secondary channels and requests approval on the secondary channel. This method is no longer considered acceptable because it increases the likelihood that the subscriber would approve an authentication request without actually comparing the secrets as required. This has been observed with “authentication fatigue” attacks in which an attacker generates many out-of-band authentication requests to the subscriber, who might approve one to eliminate the annoyance. For this reason, these guidelines require the transfer of the secret between the out-of-band device and the primary channel to increase assurance that the subject is actively participating in the session with the verifier. Presenting the claimant with a list of secrets to compare is not sufficient to meet this requirement, as the claimant may reasonably guess the secret due to the limited size of the list that can be presented.
|
|
3.1.4 Single-Factor OTP
|
A single-factor OTP generates one-time passwords (OTPs). This category includes hardware devices and software-based OTP generators that are installed on devices such as mobile phones. These authenticators have an embedded secret that is used as the seed for generating OTPs and do not require activation through a second factor. The OTP is displayed on the authenticator and manually input for transmission to the verifier, thereby proving possession and control of the authenticator. A single-factor OTP authenticator is “something you have.” Single-factor OTPs are similar to look-up secret authenticators except that the secrets are cryptographically and independently generated by the authenticator and the verifier and compared by the verifier. The secret is computed based on a nonce that may be time-based or from a counter on the authenticator and verifier. OTP authentication is not phishing-resistant. [FIPS140] validation of OTP authenticators and verifiers is not required.
|
|
3.1.5 Multi-Factor OTPs
|
A multi-factor OTP generates one-time passwords for authentication following the input of an activation factor. This includes hardware devices and software-based OTP generators that are installed on mobile phones and similar devices. The second authentication factor may be provided through an integral entry pad, an integral biometric (e.g., fingerprint) reader, or a direct computer interface (e.g., universal serial bus [USB] port). The OTP is displayed on the authenticator and manually input for transmission to the verifier. The multi-factor OTP authenticator is “something you have” activated by either “something you know” or “something you are.” OTP authentication is not phishing-resistant. [FIPS140] validation of OTP authenticators and verifiers is not required.
|
|
3.1.6 Single-Factor Cryptographic Authentication
|
Single-factor cryptographic authentication is accomplished by proving the possession and control of a cryptographic key via an authentication protocol. Depending on the strength of authentication required, the authentication key may be stored in a manner that is accessible to the endpoint associated with the authenticator or in a separate, directly connected processor or device. The authenticator output is highly dependent on the specific cryptographic protocol used but is generally some type of signed message. A single-factor cryptographic authenticator is “something you have.” Single-factor cryptographic authenticators used at AAL3 SHALL use public-key cryptography to protect the authentication secrets from compromise of the verifier. Cryptographic authentication is phishing-resistant if it meets the additional requirements in Sec. 3.2.5.
|
|
3.1.7 Multi-Factor Cryptographic Authentication
|
Multi-factor cryptographic authentication uses an authentication protocol to prove possession and control of an authentication key that requires activation through a second authentication factor. Depending on the strength of authentication needed, the authentication key may be stored in a manner that is accessible to the endpoint being authenticated or in a separate, directly connected processor or device. The authenticator output is highly dependent on the specific cryptographic protocol used but is generally some type of signed message. A multi-factor cryptographic authenticator is “something you have” and is activated by an activation factor that represents either “something you know” or “something you are.” Multi-factor cryptographic authenticators used at AAL3 SHALL use public-key cryptography to protect the authentication secrets from compromise of the verifier. Cryptographic authentication is phishing-resistant if it meets the additional requirements in Sec. 3.2.5.
|
1.1 Sklici
1.2 Ugotovljene zahteve
1.3 Povezani predpisi
2. Ugotovljene zahteve
3. Povezani predpisi
- NIST -
EN: Publications of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), U.S. Department of Commerce, https://www.nist.gov/, from their electronic versions (OSCAL; SP 800-63-4 from its HTML version, https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/). Works of NIST employees are not subject to copyright protection in the United States (17 U.S.C. § 105); the OSCAL content is dedicated to the public domain worldwide (CC0 1.0); outside the United States NIST grants the right to reprint its technical series publications in all formats (NIST copyright statement). Republished courtesy of the National Institute of Standards and Technology; each document names its citation. Divided into sections and converted into the GRCA format, the wording unchanged. Only the versions published by NIST are authoritative.
DE: Veröffentlichungen des National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), U.S. Department of Commerce, https://www.nist.gov/, aus ihren elektronischen Fassungen (OSCAL; SP 800-63-4 aus ihrer HTML-Fassung, https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/). Werke von NIST-Beschäftigten sind in den USA urheberrechtlich nicht geschützt (17 U.S.C. § 105); die OSCAL-Inhalte sind weltweit gemeinfrei gestellt (CC0 1.0); außerhalb der USA räumt das NIST das Recht ein, seine Technical-Series-Publikationen in allen Formaten neu zu veröffentlichen (Copyright-Hinweis des NIST). „Republished courtesy of the National Institute of Standards and Technology“; jedes Dokument nennt seine Zitierangabe. In Abschnitte aufgeteilt und in das GRCA-Format umgewandelt, der Wortlaut unverändert. Maßgeblich sind allein die vom NIST veröffentlichten Fassungen.
|