|
+Automated Decision-Making Technology (ADMT) Transparency |
Automated Decision-Making Technology (ADMT) TransparencyDescriptionMechanisms exist to provide data subjects with sufficient details of the logic and parameters used by Automated Decision-Making Technology (ADMT) to process the Personal Data (PD) to generate an output with respect to the data subject.Possible Solutions & ConsiderationsMicro-Small Business (<10 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 1-2∙ Explain how automated decisions are made to affected usersSmall Business (10-49 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 3-4∙ ADMT transparency policy∙ Explanation of ADMT logic in privacy notice Medium Business (50-249 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 5-6∙ Formal ADMT transparency program∙ Explainability requirements for ADMT systems Large Business (250-999 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 7-8∙ Enterprise ADMT transparency program∙ Explainable AI (XAI) for ADMT systems Enterprise (> 1,000 staff) / BLS Firm Size Class 9∙ Enterprise AI explainability framework for ADMT∙ XAI tools (SHAP, LIME) ∙ Regulatory compliance (GDPR Art. 13-15, 22) SCR-CMMLevel 0 Not PerformedPractices are non-existent, based on the inability to demonstrate an implemented and operational capability. A reasonable person would conclude the control is not being performed.Level 1 Performed InformallySCR-CMM Level 1 criteria definitions are not available for this control:▪ A reasonable person would conclude this control requires a structured process. ▪ At this level of maturity, the "ad hoc" nature of performing a capability informally would indicate the intent of the control is not met due to a lack of consistency and formality. Level 2 Planned TrackedSCR-CMM Level 2 criteria definitions are not available for this control:▪ A reasonable person would conclude a well-defined and standardized process is required. ▪ At this level of maturity, the “requirements-driven” nature of performing the control is focused on a localized and/or regionalized implementation, not uniform and consistent across the organization. ▪ Requirements are narrowly scoped for applicability and are primarily derived from compliance obligations (e.g., laws, regulations and contracts). Level 3 Well DefinedPrivacy (PRI) capabilities are standardized across the entity for applicability to People, Processes, Technologies, Data and/or Facilities (PPTDF) to ensure consistency for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:▪ Policies and standards associated with PRI domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function. ▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with PRI domain capabilities are well-documented and kept current by process owners. ▪ A data privacy team, or similar function, is appropriately staffed and supported to implement and maintain PRI domain capabilities. ▪ Technology is leveraged to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of data privacy operations (e.g., privacy notice management software and customer management solution). ▪ The entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function, works with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with PRI domain capabilities to address Minimum Compliance Requirements (MCR) (e.g., applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements) and Discretionary Security Requirements (DSR) (e.g., entity-required controls). ▪ An implemented and operational capability exists to provide data subjects with sufficient details of the logic and parameters used by Automated Decision-Making Technology (ADMT) to process the Personal Data (PD) to generate an output with respect to the data subject. Level 4 Quantitatively ControlledUtilize SCR-CMM Level 3 criteria definitions:▪ There are no defined Level 4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to operationalize this control. ▪ While it may be possible to develop “metrics-driven” capabilities for this control, the criteria would be organization-specific to define. Level 5 Continuously ImprovingUtilize SCR-CMM Level 3 or Level 4 (if available) criteria definitions:▪ There are no defined Level 5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to operationalize this control. ▪ Level 5 capabilities should be considered “world-class” where the control builds on Level 4 capabilities, but are continuously improving through Artificial Intelligence (AI) and/or Machine Learning (ML) technologies. ▪ While it may be possible to develop responsive capabilities for this control through the use of AI and/or ML technologies, the criteria would be organization-specific to define. 1. Pregled
1.1 Sklici1.2 Ugotovljene zahteve1.3 Povezani predpisi2. Ugotovljene zahteve
3. Povezani predpisi
Povezane zadeve
|