Assessment Objectives
In addition to relevant policies, standards and procedures, the assessor shall examine, interview, and/or test to determine if appropriately scoped evidence exists to support the claim that:
- RSK-13_A01 the frequency to assess risk to organizational operations, organizational assets and individuals is defined.
Defined parameters: at least annually
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: 171A_3.11.1[a] 172A_3.11.5e_ODP[1] - RSK-13_A02 a document in which risk assessment results are to be documented (if not documented in the cybersecurity / data privacy plans or risk assessment report) is defined.
Defined parameters: security assessment report
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: 53A_R5_RA-03_ODP[01] 53A_R5_RA-03_ODP[02] - RSK-13_A03 a risk assessment is conducted to determine the likelihood and magnitude of harm from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification or destruction of the system. the information it processes, stores or transmits. and any related information.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: 53A_R5_RA-03a.02 - RSK-13_A04 personnel or roles to whom risk assessment results are to be disseminated is/are defined.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: 53A_R5_RA-03_ODP[04] - RSK-13_A05 risk assessment results are disseminated to personnel or roles.
Assessment rigor: 1
Origin: 53A_R5_RA-03e. - RSK-13_A06 the frequency to update the risk assessment is defined.
Defined parameters: at least annually
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_RA-03_ODP[05] - RSK-13_A07 the frequency to review risk assessment results is defined.
Defined parameters: at least annually
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_RA-03_ODP[03] - RSK-13_A08 a risk assessment is conducted to identify threats to and vulnerabilities in the system.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_RA-03a.01 - RSK-13_A09 security solutions are identified.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 172A_3.11.5e[a] - RSK-13_A10 current and accumulated threat intelligence is identified.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 172A_3.11.5e[b] - RSK-13_A11 Anticipated risk to organizational systems and the organization based on current and accumulated threat intelligence is identified.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 172A_3.11.5e[c] - RSK-13_A12 the effectiveness of security solutions is assessed frequency to address anticipated risk to organizational systems and the organization based on current and accumulated threat intelligence.
Defined parameters: at least annually
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 172A_3.11.5e[d] - RSK-13_A13 a risk assessment is conducted to determine the likelihood and impact of adverse effects on individuals arising from the processing of Personal Data (PD).
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_RA-03a.03 - RSK-13_A14 risk assessment results and risk management decisions from the organization and mission or business process perspectives are integrated with system-level risk assessments.
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_RA-03b. - RSK-13_A15 risk assessment results are documented per organization-defined criteria.
Defined parameters: security assessment report
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_RA-03c. - RSK-13_A16 risk assessment results are reviewed frequently.
Defined parameters: at least annually and when a significant change occurs
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_RA-03d. - RSK-13_A17 the risk assessment is updated frequently or when there are significant changes to the system, its environment of operation or other conditions that may impact the cybersecurity / data privacy state of the system.
Defined parameters: at least annually and when a significant change occurs
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: 53A_R5_RA-03f. - RSK-13_A18 risk to organizational operations, organizational assets and individuals resulting from the operation of an organizational system that processes, stores or transmits sensitive / regulated data is assessed with the defined frequency.
Defined parameters: at least annually
Assessment rigor: 2
Origin: 171A_3.11.1[b] - RSK-13_A19 the risk (including supply chain risk) of unauthorized disclosure resulting from the processing, storage, or transmission of sensitive / regulated data is assessed.
Defined parameters: at least annually, and upon significant change to the data processing environment
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: SCF Created - RSK-13_A20 risk assessments are updated per an organization-defined frequency.
Defined parameters: at least every 12 months, or when there are significant incidents or significant changes to risks
Assessment rigor: 3
Origin: SCF Created - RSK-13_A21 the risk (including supply chain risk) of unauthorized disclosure resulting from the processing, storage, or transmission of CUI is assessed.
Assessment rigor: NIST 800-171
Origin: 171A_R3_A.03.11.01.a - RSK-13_A22 risk assessments are updated <A.03.11.01.ODP[01]: frequency>.
Defined parameters: at least every 12 months, or when there are significant incidents or significant changes to risks
Assessment rigor: NIST 800-171
Origin: 171A_R3_A.03.11.01.b
Povezane zadeve
| Vrsta povezave | Zadeva |
|---|---|
| blocks | Risk Assessment |
- Secure Controls Framework -
The Secure Controls Framework® (SCF)
"The SCF is the Common Controls Framework™ (CCF), the world's most comprehensive cybersecurity and data privacy metaframework - it is also free to use. The entire concept is building secure, compliant and resilient capabilities in the most efficient and cost-effective manner possible.
The SCF is more than just a unified control catalog, since its included content creates a playbook for Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) capabilities. Used globally by organizations of every size, the SCF is a robust and scalable solution for security, compliance and resilience controls. As a comprehensive security framework, the SCF maps 1,400+ controls across 200+ laws, regulations, and industry frameworks so you can implement once and comply everywhere.
Like it or not, cybersecurity is a protracted war on an asymmetric battlefield, where the threats are everywhere and as defenders we have to make the effort to work together to help improve cybersecurity and data privacy practices, since we all suffer when massive data breaches occur or when cyber attacks have physical impacts. Hackers share information on attack methods with other hackers, so why shouldn’t the good guys share information on how to best protect an organization? We decided to take action and make a difference, since we feel it is too important to wait for someone else to fix the problems that exist.
The SCF is made up of volunteers, mainly specialists within the cybersecurity profession, who focus on GRC and the cybersecurity side of data privacy. These are auditors, engineers, architects, incident responders, consultants and other specialists who live and breathe these topics on a daily basis. The end product is "expert-derived content" that makes up the SCF." https://securecontrolsframework.com/Terms & Conditions
The SCF End User License Agreement (EULA) governs the use of the Secure Controls Framework® (SCF) under the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License.