+Session Termination

Session Termination

Description

Automated mechanisms exist to log out users, both locally on the network and for remote sessions, at the end of the session or after an organization-defined period of inactivity.

Possible Solutions & Considerations

Micro-Small Business (<10 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 1-2

∙ Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)

Small Business (10-49 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 3-4

∙ Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)

Medium Business (50-249 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 5-6

∙ Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)

Large Business (250-999 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 7-8

∙ Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)

Enterprise (> 1,000 staff) / BLS Firm Size Class 9

∙ Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)

SCR-CMM

Level 0 Not Performed

Practices are non-existent, based on the inability to demonstrate an implemented and operational capability. A reasonable person would conclude the control is not being performed.

Level 1 Performed Informally

Identification & Authentication (IAC) domain capabilities are ad hoc and inconsistent. Capability criteria associated with this control may include:
▪ Policies, standards & procedures associated with IAC domain capabilities provide limited coverage due to the depth and breadth of the existing documentation.
▪ Identity & Access Management (IAM)-related activities are decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
▪ IAM controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards) to manage accounts and permissions.
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity personnel identify and implement IAM cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements.

Level 2 Planned Tracked

Identification & Authentication (IAC) capabilities are requirements-driven, but are not standardized across the entity (e.g., local/regional level consistency). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with IAC domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with IAC domain capabilities are documented and maintained by process owners.
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity personnel work with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with IAC domain capabilities to address applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD).
▪ Identity & Access Management (IAM)-related controls are primarily administrative and preventative in nature (e.g., policies, standards and procedures & guidelines) to enforce Logical Access Control (LAC).
▪ IAM may be a defined function (e.g., team or department) or assigned as an additional duty to existing IT and/or cybersecurity personnel to implement Role Based Access Control (RBAC) practices for the management of user, group and system accounts, including privileged accounts.
▪ A directory services technology is used to centrally manage identities and permissions with RBAC. Due to technical or business limitations, asset/process owners are empowered to operate a decentralized access control program for their specific Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) that cannot be integrated into directory services.
▪ Configuration management and IAM functions collaborate to ensure Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC) enforce “least privileges” on TAAS.

Level 3 Well Defined

Configuration Management (CFG) capabilities are standardized across the entity for applicability to People, Processes, Technologies, Data and/or Facilities (PPTDF) to ensure consistency for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with CFG domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with CFG domain capabilities are well-documented and kept current by process owners.
▪ A configuration management team, or similar function, is appropriately staffed and supported to implement and maintain CFG domain capabilities.
▪ Technology is leveraged to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of configuration management operations (e.g., Configuration Management Database (CMBD) Asset Management solution).
▪ The entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function, works with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with CFG domain capabilities to address Minimum Compliance Requirements (MCR) (e.g., applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements) and Discretionary Security Requirements (DSR) (e.g., entity-required controls).
▪ An implemented and operational capability exists to automatically log out users, both locally on the network and for remote sessions, at the end of the session or after an organization-defined period of inactivity.

Level 4 Quantitatively Controlled

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ While it may be possible to develop “metrics-driven” capabilities for this control, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.

Level 5 Continuously Improving

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 or Level 4 (if available) criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ Level 5 capabilities should be considered “world-class” where the control builds on Level 4 capabilities, but are continuously improving through Artificial Intelligence (AI) and/or Machine Learning (ML) technologies.
▪ While it may be possible to develop responsive capabilities for this control through the use of AI and/or ML technologies, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.

1. Přehled

1.1 Odkazy

1.2 Identifikované požadavky

1.3 Související regulace

2. Identifikované požadavky

Požadavky

3. Související regulace

Regulace
EULAW Článek 13 Řízení bezpečnosti sítí

Článek 13

Řízení bezpečnosti sítí

Finanční subjekty v rámci ochranných opatření zajišťujících bezpečnost sítí proti vniknutí a zneužití údajů vypracují, zdokumentují a zavedou politiky, postupy, protokoly a nástroje pro řízení bezpečnosti sítí, včetně všech následujících prvků:

a) 

oddělení a segmentace systémů a sítí IKT s ohledem na:

i) 

zásadnost nebo důležitost funkce, kterou tyto systémy a sítě IKT podporují;

ii) 

klasifikaci stanovenou v souladu s čl. 8 odst. 1 nařízení (EU) 2022/2554;

iii) 

celkový rizikový profil aktiv v oblasti IKT využívajících tyto systémy a sítě IKT;

b) 

dokumentace všech síťových připojení a datových toků finančního subjektu;

c) 

používání oddělené a vyhrazené sítě pro správu aktiv v oblasti IKT;

d) 

stanovení a provádění kontrol přístupu k síti, aby se zabránilo tomu, že se k síti finančního subjektu připojí jakékoli neschválené zařízení nebo systém nebo jakýkoli koncový bod, který nesplňuje bezpečnostní požadavky finančního subjektu;

e) 

šifrování síťových spojení procházejících podnikovými sítěmi, veřejnými sítěmi, domácími sítěmi, sítěmi třetích stran a bezdrátovými sítěmi pro používané komunikační protokoly s přihlédnutím k výsledkům schválené klasifikace dat, výsledkům posouzení rizik v oblasti IKT a šifrování síťových spojení podle čl. 6 odst. 2;

f) 

koncepce sítí v souladu s požadavky na bezpečnost IKT stanovenými finančním subjektem s přihlédnutím k osvědčeným postupům pro zajištění důvěrnosti, integrity a dostupnosti sítě;

g) 

zabezpečení síťového provozu mezi interními sítěmi a internetem a dalšími externími připojeními;

h) 

stanovení úloh a povinností a kroků pro specifikaci, provádění, schvalování, změnu a revizi pravidel brány firewall a filtrů připojení;

i) 

přezkumy architektury sítě a návrhu zabezpečení sítě prováděné jednou za rok a pravidelně u mikropodniků, aby se zjistily potenciální zranitelnosti;

j) 

opatření pro případnou dočasnou izolaci dílčích sítí a síťových komponent a zařízení;

k) 

zavedení základní úrovně bezpečné konfigurace všech síťových komponent a zabezpečení („hardening“) sítě a síťových zařízení v souladu s pokyny dodavatele, případně s normami definovanými v čl. 2 bodě 1 nařízení (EU) č. 1025/2012 a s osvědčenými postupy;

l) 

postupy pro omezení, uzamčení a ukončení systémových a vzdálených relací po určité době nečinnosti;

m) 

v případě smluv o síťových službách:

i) 

určení a specifikace opatření v oblasti bezpečnosti IKT a informací, úrovní služeb a požadavků na řízení všech síťových služeb;

ii) 

to, zda tyto služby poskytuje poskytovatel služeb IKT v rámci skupiny nebo poskytovatelé služeb IKT z řad třetích stran.

Pro účely písmene h) provádějí finanční subjekty pravidelný přezkum pravidel brány firewall a filtrů připojení v souladu s klasifikací stanovenou podle čl. 8 odst. 1 nařízení (EU) 2022/2554 a s celkovým rizikovým profilem příslušných systémů IKT. U systémů IKT, které podporují zásadní nebo důležité funkce, musí finanční subjekty ověřovat přiměřenost stávajících pravidel brány firewall a filtrů připojení nejméně jednou za šest měsíců.

Propojené úkoly

Vazby
is related to Quarterly
is related to relative Control Weighting = 09
is related to Technology
is related to Protect
is related to SCRM Focus Tier 3 TACTICAL
blocks Remote Desktop Protocol
blocks Software Deployment Tools
blocks Browser Session Hijacking
blocks Terminal Services DLL
blocks Remote Service Session Hijacking
blocks RDP Hijacking
blocks Loss of Accountability / Attribution
blocks Unauthorized Access
blocks Identity Compromise / Impersonation
blocks Unauthorized Modification / Loss of System Integrity
blocks System / Data Compromise (Technical Vector)
blocks System / Data Compromise (Non-Technical Vector)
blocks System / Service Compromise
blocks Loss of Investigative / Evidentiary Capability
blocks Loss of Confidentiality
blocks Loss of Data Integrity
blocks Drought & Water Shortage
blocks Earthquakes
blocks Fire & Wildfires
blocks Floods
blocks Hurricanes & Tropical Storms
blocks Landslides & Debris Flow
blocks Pandemic (Disease) Outbreaks
blocks Severe Weather
blocks Space Weather
blocks Thunderstorms & Lightning
blocks Tornadoes
blocks Tsunamis
blocks Volcanoes
blocks Winter Storms & Extreme Cold
blocks Malicious Cyber Activity
blocks Dysfunctional Management Practices
blocks Human Error
blocks Technical / Mechanical Failure
blocks Fraud, Corruption and/or Intentional Criminal Conduct
blocks Product Defect / Design Failure
blocks PSS-06.02B
is blocked by CFG-04.5 Session Termination – Assessment Procedure
blocks AC-12 Session Termination
blocks AC-12 [M] Session Termination
blocks AC-12 [H] Session Termination
blocks 03.01.01 Account Management
blocks 03.01.11 Session Termination
blocks 03.07.05 Nonlocal Maintenance
  • Secure Controls Framework -

    The Secure Controls Framework® (SCF)

    "The SCF is the Common Controls Framework™ (CCF), the world's most comprehensive cybersecurity and data privacy metaframework - it is also free to use. The entire concept is building secure, compliant and resilient capabilities in the most efficient and cost-effective manner possible.

    The SCF is more than just a unified control catalog, since its included content creates a playbook for Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) capabilities. Used globally by organizations of every size, the SCF is a robust and scalable solution for security, compliance and resilience controls. As a comprehensive security framework, the SCF maps 1,400+ controls across 200+ laws, regulations, and industry frameworks so you can implement once and comply everywhere.

    Like it or not, cybersecurity is a protracted war on an asymmetric battlefield, where the threats are everywhere and as defenders we have to make the effort to work together to help improve cybersecurity and data privacy practices, since we all suffer when massive data breaches occur or when cyber attacks have physical impacts. Hackers share information on attack methods with other hackers, so why shouldn’t the good guys share information on how to best protect an organization? We decided to take action and make a difference, since we feel it is too important to wait for someone else to fix the problems that exist.

    The SCF is made up of volunteers, mainly specialists within the cybersecurity profession, who focus on GRC and the cybersecurity side of data privacy. These are auditors, engineers, architects, incident responders, consultants and other specialists who live and breathe these topics on a daily basis. The end product is "expert-derived content" that makes up the SCF." https://securecontrolsframework.com/ 

    Terms & Conditions

    The SCF End User License Agreement (EULA) governs the use of the Secure Controls Framework® (SCF) under the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License.