+240. Competent authorities should assess whether the institution has implemented adequate …

240. Competent authorities should assess whether the institution has implemented adequate …

Competent authorities should assess whether the institution has implemented adequate arrangements, strategies, processes and mechanisms to manage reputational risk. In particular, competent authorities should take into account whether:

  • a. the institution has formalised policies and processes in place for the identification, management and monitoring of this risk, including a robust code of conduct, and whether these policies and processes are proportionate to its size and its relevance in the system;
  • b. the institution addresses this risk in a precautionary manner, including putting in place appropriate metrics and monitoring tools, coverage of potential reputation issues in contingency plans, conducting relevant training and awareness sessions and leveraging lessons learned;
  • c. the institution conducts stress testing or scenario analysis to assess any secondary effects of reputational risk (e.g. liquidity and funding costs, securitisation transactions, access to correspondent banking service);
  • d. the institution acts to protect its brand through tools to monitor media/social media, protocols to address misinformation and adverse publicity as well as prompt communication campaigns;
  • e. the institution considers the potential impact of its strategy and business plans, and more generally of its behaviour, on its reputation.

6.4.5. Operational resilience

1. Přehled

,
Název Regulace

1.1 Odkazy

1.2 Identifikované požadavky

1.3 Související standardy

2. Identifikované požadavky

Požadavky
Zdroj Požadavek

3. Související standardy

Standardy
Zdroj Požadavek
  • EBA - Published by the European Banking Authority at https://www.eba.europa.eu/