240. Competent authorities should assess whether the institution has implemented adequate …

Competent authorities should assess whether the institution has implemented adequate arrangements, strategies, processes and mechanisms to manage reputational risk. In particular, competent authorities should take into account whether:

• a. the institution has formalised policies and processes in place for the identification, management and monitoring of this risk, including a robust code of conduct, and whether these policies and processes are proportionate to its size and its relevance in the system;
• b. the institution addresses this risk in a precautionary manner, including putting in place appropriate metrics and monitoring tools, coverage of potential reputation issues in contingency plans, conducting relevant training and awareness sessions and leveraging lessons learned;
• c. the institution conducts stress testing or scenario analysis to assess any secondary effects of reputational risk (e.g. liquidity and funding costs, securitisation transactions, access to correspondent banking service);
• d. the institution acts to protect its brand through tools to monitor media/social media, protocols to address misinformation and adverse publicity as well as prompt communication campaigns;
• e. the institution considers the potential impact of its strategy and business plans, and more generally of its behaviour, on its reputation.

6.4.5. Operational resilience

1. Übersicht

1.1 Referenzen

1.2 Identifizierte Anforderungen

1.3 Zugehörige Standards

2. Identifizierte Anforderungen

3. Zugehörige Standards

• EBA - Published by the European Banking Authority at https://www.eba.europa.eu/