+Guidelines on Technical aspects of the management of interest rate risk arising from non-trading activities under the supervisory review process (EBA/GL/2018/02)
---+1. Compliance and reporting obligations
------+Status of these guidelines
---------+1. This document contains guidelines issued pursuant to Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 …
---------+2. Guidelines set the EBA view of appropriate supervisory practices within the European System of …
------+Reporting requirements
---------+3. According to Article 16(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, competent authorities must notify …
---------+4. Notifications will be published on the EBA website, in line with Article 16(3).
---+2. Subject matter, scope and definitions
------+Subject matter and scope of application
---------+5. These guidelines specify: (a) the systems to be implemented by institutions for the …
------+Addressees
---------+6. These guidelines are addressed to competent authorities referred to in point (i) of Article 4(2) …
------+Definitions
---------+7. Unless otherwise specified, terms used and defined in Directive 2013/36/EU and in Regulation …
---+3. Implementation
------+Date of application
---------+8. Competent authorities should ensure that institutions apply these guidelines from 30 June 2019 …
------+Transitional provisions
---------+9. These specific provisions of the guidelines are subject to the following transitional …
------+Repeal
---------+10. The following guidelines are repealed with effect from 30 June 2019: Guidelines on the …
---+4. Guidelines on the management of interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities
------+4.1 General provisions
---------+11. Institutions should treat IRRBB as an important risk and always assess it explicitly and …
---------+12. Institutions should identify their IRRBB exposures and ensure that IRRBB is adequately …
---------+13. Institutions should manage and mitigate risks arising from their IRRBB exposures that affect …
---------+14. When calculating the impact of interest rate movements in the earnings perspective …
---------+15. The change in earnings should be the difference between expected earnings under a base scenario …
---------+16. Institutions should consider non-performing exposures (net of provisions) as interest rate …
---------+17. Institutions should consider interest rate derivatives, as well as off-balance-sheet items such …
---------+18. Institutions should monitor and assess their CSRBB-affected exposures, by reference to the …
---------+19. When implementing the guidelines, institutions should identify their existing and prospective …
---------+20. Based upon the assessment of their existing and prospective exposure to IRRBB, institutions …
---------+21. In addition to the existing and prospective exposure to IRRBB, when implementing the …
------+4.2 Capital identification, calculation and allocation
---------+22. When evaluating the amounts, types and distributions of internal capital pursuant to Article 73 …
---------+23. Institutions should demonstrate that their internal capital is commensurate with the level of …
---------+24. In their ICAAP analysis of the amount of internal capital required for IRRBB, institutions …
---------+25. Institutions should not only rely on the supervisory assessments of capital adequacy for IRRBB …
---------+26. Capital adequacy assessments for IRRBB should take into account the following: (a) the size and …
---------+27. The outcomes of the capital adequacy for IRRBB should be considered in an institution’s ICAAP …
---------+28. To calibrate the amount of internal capital to be held for IRRBB, institutions should use …
---------+29. Institutions that operate economic capital models should ensure that the internal capital …
---------+30. In considering whether or not an allocation of internal capital should be made in respect of …
---------+31. Institutions should consider internal capital buffer adjustments where the results of their …
------+4.3 Governance
---------+32. The IRRBB strategy of the institution, including the risk appetite for IRRBB and IRRBB …
---------+33. The institution’s risk appetite for IRRBB should be expressed in terms of the acceptable impact …
---------+34. The overall IRRBB strategy should also include the decision about the extent to which the …
---------+35. Institutions should duly assess proposals to use new products, or engage in new activities …
---------+36. Institutions using derivative instruments to mitigate IRRBB exposures should possess the …
---------+37. Institutions using models of customer behaviour as input for the measurement of their IRRBB …
---------+38. When making decisions on hedging activities, institutions should be aware of the effects of …
---------+39. Consolidating institutions should ensure that internal governance arrangements and processes …
---------+40. In view of having internal governance arrangements pursuant to Article 74 and 88 of Directive …
---------+41. The management body should, in particular, be responsible for the following: (a) Understanding …
---------+42. Institutions should have delegation arrangements and procedures in place for any delegation by …
---------+43. Institutions should articulate their risk appetite for IRRBB in terms of the risk to both …
---------+44. Institutions should implement limits that target maintaining IRRBB exposures consistent with …
---------+45. A framework should be in place to monitor the evolution of hedging strategies that rely on …
---------+46. The management body should, based on its overall IRRBB strategy, adopt robust risk policies …
---------+47. The policies should be well reasoned, robust and documented and should address all IRRBB …
---------+48. All IRRBB policies should be reviewed regularly, at least annually, and revised as needed.
---------+49. To ensure that the institution’s IRRBB management policies and procedures remain appropriate …
---------+50. The management body or its delegates should ensure that analysis and risk management activities …
---------+51. With regard to IRRBB control policies and procedures, institutions should have appropriate …
---------+52. Institutions should undertake regular reviews and evaluations of their internal control systems …
---------+53. Institutions should have their IRRBB identification, measurement, monitoring and control …
---------+54. The IT systems and applications used by the institution to carry out, process and record …
---------+55. The IT system and transaction system should be capable of recording the repricing profile …
---------+56. The systems used to measure IRRBB should be capable of capturing the IRRBB characteristics of …
---------+57. For complex, structured products in particular, the transaction system should be able to gather …
---------+58. Adequate organisational controls of IT systems should be in place to prevent the corruption of …
---------+59. Risk measures should be based on reliable market and internal data. Institutions should …
---------+60. To ensure the high quality of data, institutions should implement appropriate processes that …
---------+61. Where institutions slot cash flows into different time buckets (e.g. for gap analyses) or …
---------+62. Institutions should identify potential reasons for discrepancies and irregularities that may …
---------+63. Institutions should set up appropriate processes to ensure that the data used to feed models …
---------+64. Institutions’ internal risk-reporting systems should provide timely, accurate and comprehensive …
---------+65. The internal reports should be provided to the management body or its delegates with …
---------+66. The IRRBB reports should provide aggregate information as well as sufficient supporting detail …
---------+67. The IRRBB reports should, on a regular basis, include the results of the model reviews and …
---------+68. While the types of reports prepared for the management body or its delegates will vary based on …
---------+69. Based on these reports, the management body or its delegates should be able to assess the …
---------+70. The internal measurement system should generate reports in a format that allows the different …
---------+71. Institutions should ensure that the validation of IRRBB measurement methods — which should be …
---------+72. The validation framework should include the following four core elements: (a) evaluation of …
---------+73. In addressing the expected initial and ongoing validation activities, the policy should …
---------+74. Model risk management for IRRBB measures should follow a holistic approach that begins with …
---------+75. The review and validation results and any recommendations on model usage should be presented to …
---------+76. The ongoing review process should establish a set of exception trigger events that obligate the …
---------+77. On the basis of observations and new information gained over time, an approved model may be …
---------+78. Institutions may rely on third-party IRRBB models to manage and control IRRBB, provided that …
---------+79. Model inputs or assumptions, whether stemming from internal model processes or from third …
------+4.4 Measurement
---------+80. Institutions should implement robust internal measurement systems (IMSs) that capture all …
---------+81. Institutions should measure their exposure to IRRBB in terms of potential changes to both the …
---------+82. If commercial margins and other spread components are excluded from economic value measures …
---------+83. When calculating earnings measures, institutions should include commercial margins.
---------+84. Institutions should consider non-performing exposures (net of provisions) as interest rate …
---------+85. When measuring their exposure to IRRBB, institutions should not purely rely on the calculation …
---------+86. Institutions should not rely on a single measure of risk but should instead use the range of …
---------+87. The limitations of each quantitative tool and model used should be fully understood by the …
---------+88. Institutions should identify and measure all components of IRRBB. In order to identify …
---------+Table 1: Identification of sub-components of interest rate risk in the non-trading book
---------+Component Method Focus
------------+89. For measuring and monitoring of IRRBB, institutions should use at least one earnings-based …
------------+90. Institutions should regularly, at least quarterly and more frequently in times of increased …
------------+91. Institutions should also consider whether to apply a conditional or unconditional cash flow …
------------+92. Institutions should assess exposures in each currency in which they have positions. For the …
------------+93. When selecting interest rate shock scenarios, institutions should consider the following: (a) …
------------+94. In low interest rate environments, institutions should also consider negative interest rate …
------------+95. The results of shock scenarios should feed into the decision-making at appropriate management …
------------+96. IRRBB stress testing should be considered in the ICAAP, where institutions should undertake …
------------+97. IRRBB stress testing should be performed regularly, at least annually and more frequently in …
------------+98. The IRRBB stress-testing framework should include clearly defined objectives, scenarios …
------------+99. In enterprise-wide stress tests, the interaction of IRRBB with other risk categories (e.g. …
------------+100. Institutions should perform reverse stress tests in order to (i) identify interest rate …
------------+101. In testing vulnerabilities under stressed conditions, institutions should use larger and more …
------------+102. The results of stress scenarios should feed into the decision-making at the appropriate …
------------+103. When measuring IRRBB, institutions should fully understand and document key behavioural and …
------------+104. Institutions should, in relation to both economic value and earnings-based measures of IRRBB …
------------+105. As market conditions, competitive environments and strategies change over time, institutions …
---------+a) Behavioural assumptions for customer accounts with embedded customer optionality
------------+106. In assessing the implications of optionality, institutions should take into account: (a) The …
------------+107. Institutions should have policies in place governing the setting of, and the regular …
---------+b) Behavioural assumptions for customer accounts without specific repricing dates
------------+108. In making behavioural assumptions about accounts without specific repricing dates for the …
---------+c) Corporate planning assumptions for own equity capital
------------+109. Where institutions decide to adopt a policy intended to stabilise earnings arising from their …
------------+110. In deciding the investment term assumptions for equity capital, institutions should avoid …
------------+111. The investment term assumptions used to manage the risks to earnings and economic value …
------------+112. Where an institution has not set explicit assumptions for the investment term of equity …
------+4.5 Supervisory outlier test
---------+113. Institutions should regularly, at least quarterly, calculate the impact on their EVE of a …
---------+114. Institutions should regularly, at least quarterly, calculate the impact on their EVE of …
---------+115. When calculating the change in EVE for the purpose of paragraphs 113 and 114, institutions …
---------+116. When computing the effects of the standard EVE outlier test, institutions should use the …
---+Annex I — IRRBB measurement methods
---+Annex II – Sophistication matrix for IRRBB measurement
---+Annex III – The standardised interest rate shock scenarios
------+1. Interest rate shock scenarios and shock sizes
------+2. Calibration of other currencies
------+3. Parameterisation of the standardised interest rate shock scenarios
English - European Union - Financial Industry -

Guidelines on Technical aspects of the management of interest rate risk arising from non-trading activities under the supervisory review process (EBA/GL/2018/02)

Guidelines on Technical aspects of the management of interest rate risk arising from non-trading activities under the supervisory review process (EBA/GL/2018/02)

https://www.eba.europa.eu/activities/single-rulebook/regulatory-activities/supervisory-review-and-evaluation-process-srep-and-pillar-2/guidelines-technical-aspects-management-interest-rate-risk-arising-non-trading-activities-under – PDF

1. Overview

,
Summary Regulation
1. Compliance and reporting obligations

1. Compliance and reporting obligations

2. Subject matter, scope and definitions

2. Subject matter, scope and definitions

3. Implementation

3. Implementation

4. Guidelines on the management of interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities

4. Guidelines on the management of interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities

Annex I — IRRBB measurement methods
Cash flow Metric modellingDescriptionRisks Limitations of metric captured • The metric approximates the gap risk
Earnings-based: • GapGap analysis allocates all relevant interest rate sensitive instruments maturity behavioural into predefined dates, assumptions. which time buckets are either It calculates according contractually the to net their fixed positions repricing or based (‘gaps’) or on inonly linearly. Gap (only risk parallel • It positions is based within on the a assumption particular time that all
analysis: Repricing gapeach time bucket. It approximates the change in net interest rate income ensuing from a yield curve shift by multiplying each net position with the corresponding interest rate change. The modified duration approximates the relative change in the netrisk) bucket mature or reprice simultaneously. • It fails to measure basis and option risk.
Unconditional cash flows (it is assumed that the timing of cash flows is Economic independent of the value: specific interest • Duration rate scenario) analysis: Modified duration/P V01 of equitypresent value of a financial instrument due to a marginal parallel shift of the yield curve by one percentage point. The modified duration of equity measures the exposure of an institution to gap risk in its non-trading book. PV01 of equity is derived from the modified duration of equity and measures the absolute change of the equity value resulting from a 1 basis point (0.01%) parallel shift of the yield curve. The starting point is the allocation of all cash flows of interest rate sensitive instruments into time buckets. For each instrument type, an appropriate yield curve is selected. The modified duration of each instrument is calculated from the change of its net present value due to a 1 percentage point parallel shift of the yield curve. The modified duration of equity is determined as the modified duration of assets times assets divided by equity minus the modified duration of liabilities times liabilities divided by equity.• The metric only applies to marginal shifts of the yield curve. In the presences of convexities, it may Gap risk underestimate the effect of larger (only parallel interest rate movements risk) • It only applies to parallel shifts of the yield curve • It fails to measure option risk and captures basis risk at best partially.
Cash flow Metric modellingDescription PV01 of equity is obtained by multiplying the modified duration of equity by the value of equity (i.e. assets minus liabilities) and dividing by 10 000 to arrive at the value change per basis point. The partial modified duration of an instrument for a specific time bucket is calculated as the modified duration above, except that notRisks Limitations of metric captured • The metric only applies to marginal
• Partialthe segment entire corresponding yield curve is shifted to the time in parallel, bucket. but These only partial the yield measures curveGap risk interest presence rate of convexity, changes. In the the metric
modified duration/p artial PV01show the sensitivity of the market value of the banking book to a marginal shift of the yield curve in particular maturity segments. To each time bucket’s partial measure a different magnitude of a shift can be applied, such that the effect of a change of the yield curve’s shape can be computed for the entire portfolio.(parallel and may underestimate the effect of non-parallel larger interest rate movements. risk) • It fails to measure the basis and option risk.
Cash flows partially or fully conditional on interest rate scenario (it is assumed that the timing of cash flows of options, of Earnings-instruments with based: embedded, explicit Focus on options and – in net interest more sophisticated income (NII) approaches – of component: instruments of • Change of which the maturity NII depends on clients’ behaviour, is modelled conditional on the interest rate scenario)The change of NII is an earnings-based metric and measures the change of the net interest income over a particular time horizon (usually 1-5 years) resulting from a sudden or gradual interest rate movement. The starting point is the mapping of all cash flows of interest rate sensitive instruments to (granular) time buckets (or using the exact repricing dates of individual positions in more sophisticated systems). The base scenario for the calculations reflects the institution’s current corporate plan to project the volume, pricing and repricing dates of future business transactions. The interest rates used to calculate future cash flows in the base scenario are derived from forward rates, appropriate spreads or market expected rates for different instruments. In assessing the possible extent of NII changes, banks use assumptions and models to predict the path of interest rates, the run-off of existing assets, liabilities and off-balance-sheet items, and their potential replacement.Gap risk (parallel and non-parallel), basis risk and, • Sensitivity of the outcome to the provided all modelling and behavioural cash flows assumptions are modelled • Complexity scenario dependent, also option risk
Cash flow Metric modellingDescription Earnings-based metrics can be differentiated according to the sophistication of projecting future cash flows: simple run-off models assume that existing assets and liabilities mature without replacement; constant balance sheet models assume that maturing assets and liabilities are replaced by identical instruments; while the most complex dynamic cash flow models reflect business responses to differing interest rate environments in the size and composition of the banking book. All earnings-based metrics can be used in a scenario or stochastic analysis. Earnings at risk (EaR) is an example of the latter, which measures the maximum NII change at a given confidence level. The change in EVE is the change in the net present value of all cashRisks Limitations of metric captured Gap risk (parallel and • Sensitivity of the outcome to the
Economic value: Focus onflows balance-sheet assuming originating that items all from banking resulting banking book from book positions a assets, change run liabilities in off. interest and rates, off-non- parallel), basis risk • modelling assumptions Stochastic and metrics, behavioural which apply
economic value equity of (EVE)The interest interest rate rate scenarios risk can or be by assessed the distribution by the ∆EVE of ∆EVE for using specific Monteand, if all distributional assumption, may fail to cash are modelled flows • capture Full revaluation tail risks Monte and non-linearities Carlo
• Change EVE inexample change Carlo or for historical of a the given latter, simulations. confidence which measures level. Economic the value maximum at risk equity (EVaR) value is andependent, also scenario option approaches demanding interpret (‘black-box’) and are computationally may be difficult to risk • Complexity
Annex II – Sophistication matrix for IRRBB measurement

Institutions should apply at least the level of sophistication in their risk measures shown in the table below corresponding to their categorisation under the SREP Guidelines. Where the complexity or scope of an institution’s business model is significant, the institution should, notwithstanding its size, apply and implement risk measures that correspond to its specific business model and adequately capture all sensitivities. All material sensitivities to the interest rate changes should be adequately captured, including sensitivity to behavioural assumptions.

Institutions that offer financial products containing embedded optionalities should use measurement systems that can adequately capture the dependence of options to interest rate changes. Institutions with products that provide behavioural optionalities to clients should use adequate conditional cash flow modelling approaches to quantify IRRBB with regard to the changes in client behaviour that could occur under different interest rate stress scenarios.

The four categories referred to in the sophistication table below reflect the categorisation of institutions laid down in the EBA SREP Guidelines. The different categories reflect different size,

structure and the nature, scope and complexity corresponding to the most sophisticated institutions.of activities of Indicative supervisory expectationsinstitutions; with Category regarding IRRBB1 metric and modellingdepending
IRRBB metric and modellingon the institution’s sophisticationcategory
Cash flow modelling MetricCategory 4 institutionCategory 3 institutionCategory 2 institutionCategory 1 institution
Unconditional cash Earnings-based: flows (it is assumed Gap analysis: that the timing of cash • Repricing gap flows is independent of the specific interest rate scenario)Time buckets advised in the Banking Supervision’s Standards the Management and Supervision Rate Risk in the banking book’ BCBS Standards).Basel Committee on ‘Principles for of Interest from April 2016 Time buckets advised in BCBS Standards,[Gap based on evolving size banking book due to business interest rate environments. commercial margins consistent scenario (see section 4.4, ‘Measurement’).]* [Partial duration computed per instrumentand composition of the responses to differing Including projected with the interest rate [Partial duration computed per
Economic value: Duration analysis: • • Modified duration/PV01 equity Partial modified ofTime buckets advised in BCBS Standards. Application standard Yield with corresponding tenors curve shocks. model of to theapplication of partial duration weights. Application shocks rate scenarios ‘Measurement’). shock and (see and other of standard section stress Yield interest 4.4,type and time bucket. Application of standard and shock (see ‘Measurement’). other section and interest stress 4.4, scenarios Yield ratetransaction and time bucket. Application of ‘Measurement’). standard interest stress section scenarios 4.4, rate and shock other (see Yield and
duration/partial PV01time buckets. Indicative supervisory expectationscurve model with tenors corresponding buckets. to the time regarding IRRBBcurve model with tenors corresponding to the time buckets .]* metric and modellingcurve model with tenors to the time corresponding buckets. ]* depending
IRRBB metric and modellingon the institution’s sophisticationcategory
Cash flows partially or Earnings-based: fully conditional on • Net interest income interest rate scenario (NII) ( timing of cash flows of options, of instruments with embedded, explicit options and – in more sophisticated approaches – of instruments of which the maturity depends on clients’ behaviour, is modelled conditional on the interest rate scenario)Standard shocks applied to earnings under a constant balance sheet. Based on time buckets advised in the BCBS Standards. Indicative supervisory expectationsStandard and other interest rate shock and stress scenarios for the yield curve (see section 4.4, ‘Measurement’) applied to earnings, reflecting constant balance sheet or simple assumptions about future business development. regarding IRRBBStandard and other interest rate shock and stress scenarios for the yield curve and between key market rates separately (see section 4.4, ‘Measurement’) applied to earnings projected by business plan or constant balance sheet. Including projected commercial margins consistent with the interest rate scenario (see section 4.4, ‘Measurement’). metric and modellingComprehensive interest rate and stress scenarios, combining shifts of yield curves with changes in basis and credit spreads, as well as changes in customer behaviour, are applied to reforecast business volumes and earnings to measure the difference compared with the underlying business plan. Including projected commercial margins consistent with the interest rate scenario (see section 4.4, ‘Measurement’). depending
IRRBB metric and modellingon the institution’s sophisticationcategory
Economic value: • Economic value of equity (EVE)Application of standard and and stress scenarios for the section 4.4, ‘Measurement’), advised in the BCBS Standards; corresponding to the timeother interest rate shock yield curve (see using time buckets as yield curve tenors buckets.Measure computed on transaction or cash flow basis. Application of standard and other interest rate shock and stress scenarios for the yield curve and between key market rates separately (see section 4.4, ‘Measurement’). Adequate tenors in yield curves. Full optionality valuation.Comprehensive interest rate and stress scenarios, combining shifts of yield curves with changes in basis and credit spreads, as well as changes in customer behaviour. Adequate tenors in all yield curves. Full optionality valuation. Scenario analysis complemented by Monte Carlo or historical simulations on portfolios with material optionality. Daily updating of risk factors.
Annex III – The standardised interest rate shock scenarios

Annex III – The standardised interest rate shock scenarios

1.1 References

1.2 Identified Requirements

1.3 Related Standards

2. Identified Requirements

Requirements
Source Requirement

3. Related Standards

Standards
Source Requirement
  • EBA - Published by the European Banking Authority at https://www.eba.europa.eu/