+Sisältö
---+EPV:n ohjeet varhaisen puuttumisen toimenpiteiden käytön käynnistävistä tekijöistä 3
---+2. Subject matter, scope and definitions
------+1. Noudattamista ja ilmoittamista koskevat velvoitteet 3
------+2. Sisältö, soveltamisala ja määritelmät 4 Sisältö 4 Määritelmät 4 Vastaanottajat 5
------+3. Varhaisen puuttumisen toimenpiteiden käytön käynnistävät tekijät 5 3.1 SREP:n tuloksiin …
------+4. Täytäntöönpano 10
------+5. The following definitions apply for the purposes of these Guidelines: a. ‘Conditions for early …
------+6. These Guidelines are addressed to the competent authorities as defined in Article 4(2)(i) of …
---+3. Triggers for application of early intervention measures
------+7. These Guidelines identify the following triggers for the competent authorities’ decision on …
------+8. The breach of the triggers identified in these Guidelines should prompt the competent …
------+9. Breaches of the triggers, outcomes of associated further investigations and decisions on the …
------+10. Upon the breach of the triggers, when taking a positive decision to apply an early intervention …
------+11. When competent authorities assign to an institution an Overall SREP score of ‘4’ they should …
------+12. The results of the Overall SREP assessment and specific pre-defined combinations of the results …
------+13. In particular, should the competent authority, as an outcome of SREP, assign to an institution …
------+14. In addition, in certain circumstances, the competent authority should also consider the …
------+15. In particular, the competent authority should decide on whether to apply early intervention …
------+16. When deciding whether to apply early intervention measures based on the above SREP scores and …
------+17. The SREP process as set out in the SREP Guidelines requires competent authorities to carry out …
------+18. When identifying thresholds for the indicators related to prudential requirements, as …
------+19. Where competent authorities, for the purpose of monitoring key indicators, set thresholds for …
------+20. Identification of material changes or anomalies in indicators, including breaches of …
------+21. Where an institution’s financial condition and risk outlook and SREP score for a particular …
------+22. Without prejudice to paragraph 21, in certain circumstances material changes or anomalies in …
------+23. Certain events may have a significant impact on an institution’s financial conditions, putting …
------+24. Generally, such events should prompt further investigations of an affected area. In particular …
------+25. Upon becoming aware of the occurrence of a significant event, the competent authority should …
------+26. The competent authority should update the risk assessment and score of the respective SREP …
------+27. Without prejudice to paragraph 26, in certain circumstances significant events may be used …
------+28. The fact that a resolution authority commences a consultation process with a competent …
---+4. Implementation
------+29. These Guidelines apply from 1 January 2016.
|
Sisältö
Sisältö
1. Yleiskatsaus
1.1 Viittaukset
1.2 Tunnistetut vaatimukset
1.3 Liittyvät standardit
2. Tunnistetut vaatimukset
Vaatimukset
| Lähde |
Vaatimus |
3. Liittyvät standardit
Standardit
| Lähde |
Vaatimus |
- EBA - Published by the European Banking Authority at https://www.eba.europa.eu/
|