+93. Competent authorities should consider using off-site reviews in those instances where a less …
|
93. Competent authorities should consider using off-site reviews in those instances where a less …
Competent authorities should consider using off-site reviews in those instances where a less intrusive supervisory approach might be sufficient, or in cases where subjects of assessment are exposed to low levels of ML/TF risk. Off-site reviews primarily involve a desk-based review of the subjects of assessment’s written AML/CFT policies and procedures and the risk assessment, but does not involve an in-depth assessment of how effectively these policies and procedures have been implemented in practice by the subject of assessment. Off-site reviews may also be considered as a preliminary step to more thorough reviews through on-site inspections that would complement off-site work, or may be used in combination with other supervisory tools.
1. Vue d’ensemble
| Intitulé |
Réglementation |
,
1.1 Références
1.2 Exigences identifiées
1.3 Normes associées
2. Exigences identifiées
Exigences
| Source |
Exigence |
3. Normes associées
- EBA - Published by the European Banking Authority at https://www.eba.europa.eu/
|