|
+Article 22 6. |
Article 22 6.When performing the review and evaluation referred to in paragraph 1, the competent authority shall, at an early stage, transmit the necessary information to the relevant authorities and, where applicable, the authority referred to in Article 67 of Directive 2014/65/EU, and consult them on whether the requirements of this Regulation or other requirements of Union law are met by the CSD as regards the functioning of the securities settlement systems operated by the CSD. The consulted authorities may issue a reasoned opinion within their areas of competence within three months of receipt of the information from the competent authority. Where a consulted authority does not provide an opinion within that deadline it shall be deemed to have issued a positive opinion. Where a consulted authority issues a negative reasoned opinion and the competent authority disagrees with it, that competent authority shall, within one month of receipt of the negative opinion, provide the consulted authority with a reasoning addressing the negative opinion. Any of the consulted authorities that issued a negative opinion may refer the matter to ESMA for assistance under Article 31(2), point (c), of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010. Where the issue is not settled within one month of its referral to ESMA, the competent authority shall take the final decision on the review and evaluation and provide a detailed explanation of its decision in writing to the relevant authorities. Negative opinions referred to in the fourth subparagraph shall state in writing the full and detailed reasons why the requirements laid down in this Regulation or other requirements of Union law are not met. 1. Prezentare generală
1.1 Referințe1.2 Cerințe identificate1.3 Standarde asociate2. Cerințe identificate
3. Standarde asociate
|