+Acquisition Strategies, Tools & Methods

Acquisition Strategies, Tools & Methods

Description

Mechanisms exist to utilize tailored acquisition strategies, contract tools and procurement methods for the purchase of unique Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS).

Possible Solutions & Considerations

Micro-Small Business (<10 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 1-2

∙ Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
∙ Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)

Small Business (10-49 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 3-4

∙ Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
∙ Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)

Medium Business (50-249 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 5-6

∙ Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
∙ Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)

Large Business (250-999 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 7-8

∙ Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
∙ Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)

Enterprise (> 1,000 staff) / BLS Firm Size Class 9

∙ Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
∙ Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)

SCR-CMM

Level 0 Not Performed

Practices are non-existent, based on the inability to demonstrate an implemented and operational capability. A reasonable person would conclude the control is not being performed.

Level 1 Performed Informally

SCR-CMM Level 1 criteria definitions are not available for this control:
▪ A reasonable person would conclude this control requires a structured process.
▪ At this level of maturity, the "ad hoc" nature of performing a capability informally would indicate the intent of the control is not met due to a lack of consistency and formality.

Level 2 Planned Tracked

Third-Party Management (TPM) capabilities are requirements-driven, but are not standardized across the entity (e.g., local/regional level consistency). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with TPM domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with TPM domain capabilities are documented and maintained by process owners.
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity personnel work with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with TPM domain capabilities to address applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD).
▪ Third-party management-related controls are primarily administrative and preventative in nature (e.g., policies, standards and procedures & guidelines).
▪ Asset management may be a defined function (e.g., team or department) or assigned as an additional duty to existing IT and/or cybersecurity personnel.

Level 3 Well Defined

Third-Party Management (TPM) capabilities are standardized across the entity for applicability to People, Processes, Technologies, Data and/or Facilities (PPTDF) to ensure consistency for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with TPM domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with TPM domain capabilities are well-documented and kept current by process owners.
▪ A procurement team, or similar function, is appropriately staffed and supported to implement and maintain TPM domain capabilities.
▪ Technology is leveraged to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of third-party management operations (e.g., TPRM risk management solution and vendor management solution).
▪ The entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function, works with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with TPM domain capabilities to address Minimum Compliance Requirements (MCR) (e.g., applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements) and Discretionary Security Requirements (DSR) (e.g., entity-required controls).
▪ An implemented and operational capability exists to utilize tailored acquisition strategies, contract tools and procurement methods for the purchase of unique Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS).

Level 4 Quantitatively Controlled

Third-Party Management (TPM) capabilities, in addition to being standardized across the entity and centrally managed to ensure consistency across Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD), efforts are metrics driven to provide sufficient insight for decision makers to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and/or identify areas for improvement. Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Applicable SCR-CMM Level 3 (Well Defined) capabilities are implemented and operational.
▪ Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
▪ Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
▪ Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
▪ Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
▪ Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
▪ Business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes to evolve capabilities.

Level 5 Continuously Improving

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 or Level 4 (if available) criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ Level 5 capabilities should be considered “world-class” where the control builds on Level 4 capabilities, but are continuously improving through Artificial Intelligence (AI) and/or Machine Learning (ML) technologies.
▪ While it may be possible to develop responsive capabilities for this control through the use of AI and/or ML technologies, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.

1. Prehľad

1.1 Odkazy

1.2 Identifikované požiadavky

1.3 Súvisiace predpisy

2. Identifikované požiadavky

Požiadavky

3. Súvisiace predpisy

Predpisy
EULAW Článok 30 3

3.   Zmluvné dojednania o využívaní IKT služieb podporujúcich kritické alebo dôležité funkcie zahŕňajú okrem prvkov uvedených v odseku 2 aspoň tieto prvky:

a)

úplné opisy úrovne služieb vrátane ich aktualizácií a revízií, ako aj presné kvantitatívne a kvalitatívne výkonnostné ciele v rámci dohodnutých úrovní služieb, aby finančný subjekt mohol účinne monitorovať IKT služby a mal možnosť bez zbytočného odkladu vykonať primerané nápravné opatrenia v prípade nesplnenia dohodnutých úrovní služieb;

b)

výpovedné lehoty a nahlasovacie povinnosti externého poskytovateľa IKT služieb voči finančnému subjektu vrátane oznamovania akéhokoľvek vývoja, ktorý by mohol mať významný vplyv na schopnosť externého poskytovateľa IKT služieb účinne poskytovať IKT služby podporujúce kritické alebo dôležité funkcie v súlade s dohodnutými úrovňami služieb;

c)

požiadavky na externého poskytovateľa IKT služieb na vykonávanie a testovanie obchodných krízových plánov a na zavedenie bezpečnostných opatrení, nástrojov a politík v oblasti IKT, ktoré poskytujú primeranú úroveň bezpečnosti na poskytovanie služieb zo strany finančného subjektu v súlade s jeho regulačným rámcom;

d)

povinnosť externého poskytovateľa IKT služieb zúčastňovať sa a plne spolupracovať na TLPT finančného subjektu, ako sa uvádza v článkoch 26 a 27;

e)

právo priebežne monitorovať výkonnosť externého poskytovateľa IKT služieb, ktoré zahŕňa:

i)

neobmedzené práva na prístup, inšpekciu a audit vykonávané finančným subjektom alebo vymenovanou treťou stranou a príslušným orgánom, ako aj právo vyhotovovať kópie príslušnej dokumentácie na mieste, ak je kritická pre operácie externého poskytovateľa IKT služieb, ktorého účinnému vykonávaniu nebránia ani ho neobmedzujú iné zmluvné dojednania alebo vykonávacie politiky;

ii)

právo dohodnúť sa na alternatívnych úrovniach zabezpečenia, ak sú dotknuté práva iných klientov;

iii)

povinnosť externého poskytovateľa IKT služieb plne spolupracovať počas inšpekcií na mieste a auditov vykonávaných príslušnými orgánmi, hlavným orgánom dozoru, finančným subjektom alebo vymenovanou treťou stranou; a

iv)

povinnosť poskytnúť podrobnosti o rozsahu, postupoch, ktoré sa majú dodržiavať, a frekvencii takýchto inšpekcií a auditov;

f)

stratégie ukončenia angažovanosti, najmä zavedenie primeraného povinného prechodného obdobia:

i)

počas ktorého bude externý poskytovateľ IKT služieb naďalej poskytovať príslušné funkcie alebo IKT služby s cieľom znížiť riziko narušenia na úrovni finančného subjektu alebo zabezpečiť efektívne riešenie jeho krízovej situácie a reštrukturalizáciu;

ii)

ktoré umožňuje finančnému subjektu prejsť k inému externému poskytovateľovi IKT služieb alebo začať využívať vlastné riešenia v závislosti od zložitosti poskytovanej služby.

Odchylne od písmena e) sa externý poskytovateľ IKT služieb a finančný subjekt, ktorý je mikropodnikom, môžu dohodnúť, že práva finančného subjektu na prístup, inšpekciu a audit možno delegovať na nezávislú tretiu stranu, ktorú určí externý poskytovateľ IKT služieb, a že finančný subjekt môže kedykoľvek od tretej strany požadovať informácie a uistenie o výkonnosti externého poskytovateľa IKT služieb.
EULAW Článok 21 Opatrenia na riadenie kybernetických rizík
-
EULAW Článok 29 Predbežné posúdenie rizika koncentrácie IKT na úrovni subjektu
-
EULAW Článok 29 Predbežné posúdenie rizika koncentrácie IKT na úrovni subjektu
-
EULAW Článok 29 Predbežné posúdenie rizika koncentrácie IKT na úrovni subjektu
-
EULAW Článok 29 1

1.   Pri vykonávaní identifikácie a posudzovania rizík uvedených v článku 28 ods. 4 písm. c) finančné subjekty zohľadňujú aj to, či by plánované uzavretie zmluvného dojednania v súvislosti s IKT službami podporujúcimi kritické alebo dôležité funkcie viedlo k niektorej z týchto skutočností:

a)

uzatvorenie zmluvy s externým poskytovateľom IKT služieb, ktorý nie je ľahko nahraditeľný, alebo

b)

uzatvorenie viacerých zmluvných dojednaní v súvislosti s poskytovaním IKT služieb podporujúcich kritické alebo dôležité funkcie s tým istým externým poskytovateľom IKT služieb alebo s úzko prepojenými externými poskytovateľmi IKT služieb.

Finančné subjekty zvážia prínosy a náklady alternatívnych riešení, ako je využívanie rôznych externých poskytovateľov IKT služieb, a súčasne zohľadnia, či a ako plánované riešenia zodpovedajú obchodným potrebám a cieľom stanoveným v ich stratégii digitálnej odolnosti.

Prepojené úlohy

Prepojenia
is related to Annual
is related to relative Control Weighting = 09
is related to Process
is related to Identify
is related to SCRM Focus Tier 1 STRATEGIC
is related to SCRM Focus Tier 2 OPERATIONAL
is related to SCRM Focus Tier 3 TACTICAL
blocks Loss of Accountability / Attribution
blocks Excessive or Unauthorized Privilege
blocks Unauthorized Privilege Elevation
blocks Unauthorized Access
blocks Loss, Theft or Damage of Assets
blocks Unauthorized Modification / Loss of System Integrity
blocks Unauthorized Retention / Inability to Dispose of Data
blocks Business / Service Interruption
blocks Data Loss / Integrity Compromise
blocks Reduced Operational Productivity
blocks System / Data Compromise (Technical Vector)
blocks System / Data Compromise (Non-Technical Vector)
blocks Revenue Loss
blocks Contractual Default / Termination
blocks Loss of Competitive Advantage
blocks Reputational Harm / Loss of Stakeholder Trust
blocks Regulatory / Legal / Contractual Financial Liability
blocks Exposure from Unaddressed Vulnerabilities
blocks System / Service Compromise
blocks Failure to Support Business / Mission Objectives
blocks Unaddressed Security / Compliance Exposure
blocks Unperformed / Unowned Control Responsibilities
blocks Uncontrolled Internal Security / Privacy Exposure
blocks Uncontrolled Third-Party Security / Privacy Exposure
blocks Lack of oversight of internal controls
blocks Lack of oversight of third-party controls
blocks Harm from Illegal, Abusive or Unsafe Content / Conduct
blocks Loss of Investigative / Evidentiary Capability
blocks Delayed Containment / Increased Incident Impact
blocks Incident Persistence / Recurrence
blocks Incident Response / Recovery Cost
blocks Undetected / Delayed Detection of Adverse Activity
blocks Third-Party Cybersecurity Compromise / Exposure
blocks Third-Party Physical Security Disruption / Exposure
blocks Sub-Tier / Fourth-Party Supply Chain Exposure
blocks Third-Party Legal / Compliance Exposure
blocks Harm from Unauthorized / Unintended Product or Service Use
blocks Third-Party Dependency Failure
blocks AppleScript
blocks Supply Chain Compromise
blocks Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools
blocks Compromise Software Supply Chain
blocks Compromise Hardware Supply Chain
blocks Malicious Image
blocks Server Software Component
blocks SQL Stored Procedures
blocks Transport Agent
blocks IIS Components
blocks LC_LOAD_DYLIB Addition
blocks Compromise Host Software Binary
blocks Modify System Image
blocks Patch System Image
blocks Downgrade System Image
blocks Fraud / Theft / Direct Financial Loss
blocks Loss of Authorization / Certification / License
blocks Inability to Demonstrate Due Diligence / Due Care
blocks Concentration / Single-Point Dependency Failure
blocks Counterfeit / Non-Conforming Component Impact
blocks Loss of Authenticity / Provenance
blocks Drought & Water Shortage
blocks Earthquakes
blocks Fire & Wildfires
blocks Floods
blocks Hurricanes & Tropical Storms
blocks Landslides & Debris Flow
blocks Pandemic (Disease) Outbreaks
blocks Severe Weather
blocks Space Weather
blocks Thunderstorms & Lightning
blocks Tornadoes
blocks Tsunamis
blocks Volcanoes
blocks Winter Storms & Extreme Cold
blocks Malicious Cyber Activity
blocks Dysfunctional Management Practices
blocks Human Error
blocks Statutory / Regulatory / Contractual Change
blocks Data Quality Degradation / Data Poisoning
blocks Fraud, Corruption and/or Intentional Criminal Conduct
blocks Conflict of Interest (COI) / Undue Influence / Insider Misconduct
blocks Economic Shock / Market Disruption
blocks Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
blocks Geopolitical Conflict / Government Intervention
blocks Sanctions / Trade Restriction Disruption
blocks Counterfeit / Non-Conforming Products
blocks Manufacturing Capacity / Supply Disruption
blocks Product Defect / Design Failure
blocks Supplier Financial Distress / Insolvency
blocks Workforce Shortage / Loss of Critical Skills / Labor Disruption
blocks Transportation / Logistics Disruption
blocks Fraud / Theft / Direct Financial Loss
blocks Loss of Authorization / Certification / License
blocks Inability to Demonstrate Due Diligence / Due Care
blocks Concentration / Single-Point Dependency Failure
blocks Counterfeit / Non-Conforming Component Impact
blocks Loss of Authenticity / Provenance
blocks Drought & Water Shortage
blocks Earthquakes
blocks Fire & Wildfires
blocks Floods
blocks Hurricanes & Tropical Storms
blocks Landslides & Debris Flow
blocks Pandemic (Disease) Outbreaks
blocks Severe Weather
blocks Space Weather
blocks Thunderstorms & Lightning
blocks Tornadoes
blocks Tsunamis
blocks Volcanoes
blocks Winter Storms & Extreme Cold
blocks Malicious Cyber Activity
blocks Dysfunctional Management Practices
blocks Human Error
blocks Statutory / Regulatory / Contractual Change
blocks Data Quality Degradation / Data Poisoning
blocks Fraud, Corruption and/or Intentional Criminal Conduct
blocks Conflict of Interest (COI) / Undue Influence / Insider Misconduct
blocks Economic Shock / Market Disruption
blocks Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
blocks Geopolitical Conflict / Government Intervention
blocks Sanctions / Trade Restriction Disruption
blocks Counterfeit / Non-Conforming Products
blocks Manufacturing Capacity / Supply Disruption
blocks Product Defect / Design Failure
blocks Supplier Financial Distress / Insolvency
blocks Workforce Shortage / Loss of Critical Skills / Labor Disruption
blocks Transportation / Logistics Disruption
blocks Fraud / Theft / Direct Financial Loss
blocks Loss of Authorization / Certification / License
blocks Inability to Demonstrate Due Diligence / Due Care
blocks Concentration / Single-Point Dependency Failure
blocks Counterfeit / Non-Conforming Component Impact
blocks Loss of Authenticity / Provenance
blocks Drought & Water Shortage
blocks Earthquakes
blocks Fire & Wildfires
blocks Floods
blocks Hurricanes & Tropical Storms
blocks Landslides & Debris Flow
blocks Pandemic (Disease) Outbreaks
blocks Severe Weather
blocks Space Weather
blocks Thunderstorms & Lightning
blocks Tornadoes
blocks Tsunamis
blocks Volcanoes
blocks Winter Storms & Extreme Cold
blocks Malicious Cyber Activity
blocks Dysfunctional Management Practices
blocks Human Error
blocks Statutory / Regulatory / Contractual Change
blocks Data Quality Degradation / Data Poisoning
blocks Fraud, Corruption and/or Intentional Criminal Conduct
blocks Conflict of Interest (COI) / Undue Influence / Insider Misconduct
blocks Economic Shock / Market Disruption
blocks Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
blocks Geopolitical Conflict / Government Intervention
blocks Sanctions / Trade Restriction Disruption
blocks Counterfeit / Non-Conforming Products
blocks Manufacturing Capacity / Supply Disruption
blocks Product Defect / Design Failure
blocks Supplier Financial Distress / Insolvency
blocks Workforce Shortage / Loss of Critical Skills / Labor Disruption
blocks Transportation / Logistics Disruption
is blocked by TPM-03 Acquisition Strategies, Tools & Methods – Assessment Procedure
blocks SR-03(01) Diverse Supply Base
blocks SR-05 Acquisition Strategies, Tools, and Methods
blocks SR-05 [L] Acquisition Strategies, Tools, and Methods
blocks SR-05 [M] Acquisition Strategies, Tools, and Methods
blocks SR-05 [H] Acquisition Strategies, Tools, and Methods
blocks 03.17.01 Supply Chain Risk Management Plan
blocks 03.17.02 Acquisition Strategies, Tools, and Methods
blocks 03.17.03 Supply Chain Requirements and Processes
  • Secure Controls Framework -

    The Secure Controls Framework® (SCF)

    "The SCF is the Common Controls Framework™ (CCF), the world's most comprehensive cybersecurity and data privacy metaframework - it is also free to use. The entire concept is building secure, compliant and resilient capabilities in the most efficient and cost-effective manner possible.

    The SCF is more than just a unified control catalog, since its included content creates a playbook for Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) capabilities. Used globally by organizations of every size, the SCF is a robust and scalable solution for security, compliance and resilience controls. As a comprehensive security framework, the SCF maps 1,400+ controls across 200+ laws, regulations, and industry frameworks so you can implement once and comply everywhere.

    Like it or not, cybersecurity is a protracted war on an asymmetric battlefield, where the threats are everywhere and as defenders we have to make the effort to work together to help improve cybersecurity and data privacy practices, since we all suffer when massive data breaches occur or when cyber attacks have physical impacts. Hackers share information on attack methods with other hackers, so why shouldn’t the good guys share information on how to best protect an organization? We decided to take action and make a difference, since we feel it is too important to wait for someone else to fix the problems that exist.

    The SCF is made up of volunteers, mainly specialists within the cybersecurity profession, who focus on GRC and the cybersecurity side of data privacy. These are auditors, engineers, architects, incident responders, consultants and other specialists who live and breathe these topics on a daily basis. The end product is "expert-derived content" that makes up the SCF." https://securecontrolsframework.com/ 

    Terms & Conditions

    The SCF End User License Agreement (EULA) governs the use of the Secure Controls Framework® (SCF) under the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License.