+3. Guidelines
---+Status of these Joint Guidelines
------+10. This document contains Joint Guidelines issued pursuant to Articles 16 and 56 of Regulation …
------+11. Joint Guidelines set out the ESAs’ view of appropriate supervisory practices within the …
---+Reporting Requirements
------+12. In accordance with Article 16(3) of the ESAs’ Regulations, competent authorities must notify …
------+13. Notifications will be published on the ESAs’ websites.
---+Title I - Subject matter, scope and definitions
------+14. These Joint Guidelines aim to clarify how competent authorities should consistently integrate …
------+15. These Joint Guidelines are addressed to competent authorities.
------+16. Competent authorities should apply these Joint Guidelines when performing supervisory stress …
------+17. Unless otherwise specified, the terms used in these Joint Guidelines have the same meaning as …
------+18. In addition, for the purposes of these Joint Guidelines, the following definitions apply: 5 i. …
---+Title II- Requirements regarding consistency, long-term considerations and common standards for assessment methodologies in stress testing of ESG risks
---+Objectives
------+19. Pursuant to the sectoral legislation, competent authorities should implement these Joint …
------+20. Competent authorities should consider all ESG risks and their potential evolution when …
------+21. Competent authorities should adopt a risk-based approach, starting with a materiality …
------+22. As part of the materiality assessment, competent authorities should identify which ESG risks …
------+23. Competent authorities should consider using clear qualitative and/or quantitative criteria …
------+24. Competent authorities are encouraged to continue their efforts and research to gradually extend …
------+25. This gradual roll-out should be accompanied by continuous methodological refinement, capacity …
------+26. Competent authorities should aim to fully integrate ESG factors into overall stress testing …
------+27. Competent authorities should review and reconsider as appropriate the types of ESG risks …
------+28. Although these Joint Guidelines do not cover system-wide financial sector stress testing …
------+29. Competent authorities should ensure, to the extent possible, that ESG stress tests account for …
---+Principles and methodological considerations
------+30. When determining the principles and methodological considerations, competent authorities should …
------+31. Competent authorities should clearly define the coverage in terms of portfolios, sectors …
------+32. For cross-border financial groups, competent authorities should ensure that all relevant …
------+33. Based on the objective and the time horizon involved, competent authorities should ensure that …
------+34. The choice of the time horizon should be aligned with the intended objective of the exercise: ▪ …
------+35. Competent authorities should identify and select stress test scenarios based on the objectives …
------+36. Wherever possible, competent authorities should consider the integration of compound risks …
------+37. With the aim of integrating material ESG risks into short-term stress testing exercises …
------+38. When performing longer-term ESG stress testing, competent authorities should consider several …
------+39. Depending on the sophistication of the approach, scenarios may take the form of simple …
------+40. Competent authorities may decide to apply the same scenarios to all financial entities for …
------+41. Competent authorities should assess the merits of a top-down versus bottom-up approach …
------+42. When using a bottom-up approach, competent authorities should establish clear methodological …
------+43. A hybrid approach could be considered, leveraging the strengths of both methodologies. …
------+44. In deciding on the level of granularity, competent authorities should strike an appropriate …
------+45. At a minimum, competent authorities should consider the following granularity dimensions: a. …
------+46. Competent authorities should decide on the appropriate level of data granularity depending on …
------+47. For the analysis of funds, competent authorities may consider, when possible and consistent …
------+48. For ESG stress tests, competent authorities should start by using a static balance sheet …
------+49. For exercises with medium to long term time horizons, a dynamic balance sheet (with or without …
------+50. Given the uncertainties surrounding transition pathways, policy developments, and market …
------+51. Any management actions recognised by financial entities should be assessed based on their …
------+52. Competent authorities should define the appropriate sample of financial entities to participate …
------+53. Competent authorities should also consider conducting targeted exercises on specific subsets of …
------+54. Competent authorities should apply proportionality principles, allowing for methodological …
------+55. Given the early-stage of development of ESG stress test modelling and data availability …
------+56. Competent authorities should recognise that all models have inherent limitations, and this …
---+Organisational and governance arrangements
------+57. Competent authorities should ensure that sufficient and adequate human and material resources …
------+58. Competent authorities should have data management and collection capabilities that support …
------+59. Competent authorities should set appropriate timelines for conducting ESG stress tests and …
------+60. The process should be structured to facilitate efficient analysis, consistent communication of …
------+61. For top-down exercises, competent authorities should rely, as much as possible, on regulatory …
------+62. Where data gaps exist, competent authorities should promote the use of reasonable proxies …
------+63. A rigorous quality assurance process should be implemented to verify the accuracy, consistency …
------+64. Competent authorities should maintain effective and structured dialogue with financial entities …
------+65. Where relevant and possible, competent authorities should coordinate across jurisdictions to …
------+66. When relevant, system-wide coordination should also be pursued to ensure that ESG stress tests …
------+67. ESG stress test results should be, to the extent possible, integrated into the broader …
------+68. The results should also guide supervisory follow-up measures and policy recommendations where …
------+69. Publication of results should be in line with relevant sectoral regulation and supervisory …
------+70. Given the evolving nature of ESG risks and stress testing methodologies, competent authorities …
---+Title III- Implementation
------+71. These Joint Guidelines apply from 1 January 2027 15

3. Guidelines

3. Guidelines

1. Overview

,
Summary Regulation
Status of these Joint Guidelines

Status of these Joint Guidelines

Reporting Requirements

Reporting Requirements

Title I - Subject matter, scope and definitions

Title I - Subject matter, scope and definitions

Title II- Requirements regarding consistency, long-term considerations and common standards for assessment methodologies in stress testing of ESG risks

Title II- Requirements regarding consistency, long-term considerations and common standards for assessment methodologies in stress testing of ESG risks

Objectives

Objectives

Principles and methodological considerations

Principles and methodological considerations

Organisational and governance arrangements

Allocation of resources

Title III- Implementation

Title III- Implementation

1.1 References

1.2 Identified Requirements

1.3 Related Standards

2. Identified Requirements

Requirements
Source Requirement

3. Related Standards

Standards
Source Requirement
  • EBA - Published by the European Banking Authority at https://www.eba.europa.eu/