+Airteagal 40 Caighdeáin chomhchuibhithe agus spriocanna insoláthartha um chaighdeánú
---+Airteagal 40 1.
---+Airteagal 40 2.
---+Airteagal 40 3.

Airteagal 40 Caighdeáin chomhchuibhithe agus spriocanna insoláthartha um chaighdeánú

-

1. Forbhreathnú

,
Airteagal 40 1.
Córais intleachta saorga ardriosca nó samhlacha intleachta saorga ilchuspóireacha atá i gcomhréir le caighdeáin chomhchuibhithe nó le codanna díobh, agus ar foilsíodh a dtagairtí in Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh i gcomhréir le Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 1025/2012, toimhdeofar iad a bheith i gcomhréir leis na ceanglais a leagtar amach i Roinn 2 den Chaibidil seo nó, de réir mar is infheidhme, leis na hoibleagáidí a leagtar amach i gCaibidil V, Ranna 2 agus 3, den Rialachán seo, a mhéid a chumhdaítear na ceanglais nó na hoibleagáidí sin leis na caighdeáin sin.
Airteagal 40 2.
I gcomhréir le hAirteagal 10 de Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 1025/2012, eiseoidh an Coimisiún, gan moill mhíchuí, iarrataí ar chaighdeánú lena gcumhdófar na ceanglais uile a leagtar amach i Roinn 2 den Chaibidil seo agus, de réir mar is infheidhme, iarrataí ar chaighdeánú lena gcumhdaítear oibleagáidí a leagtar amach i gCaibidil V, Ranna 2 agus 3, den Rialachán seo. Leis an iarraidh ar chaighdeánú, iarrfar freisin spriocanna insoláthartha maidir le próisis tuairiscithe agus doiciméadachta chun feidhmíocht acmhainní na gcóras intleachta saorga a fheabhsú, amhail ídiú fuinnimh agus acmhainní eile an chórais intleachta saorga ardriosca a laghdú le linn a shaolré, agus maidir le samhlacha intleachta saorga ilchuspóireacha a fhorbairt ar bhealach atá tíosach ar fhuinneamh. Agus iarraidh ar chaighdeánú á hullmhú aige, rachaidh an Coimisiún i gcomhairle leis an mBord agus leis na geallsealbhóirí ábhartha, lena n-áirítear an fóram comhairleach.

Agus iarraidh ar chaighdeánú á heisiúint aige chuig eagraíochtaí Eorpacha um chaighdeánú, sonróidh an Coimisiún nach mór na caighdeáin a bheith soiléir, comhsheasmhach, lena n-áirítear leis na caighdeáin a forbraíodh sna hearnálacha éagsúla le haghaidh táirgí a chumhdaítear le reachtaíocht chomhchuibhithe reatha an Aontais a liostaítear in Iarscríbhinn I, agus é mar aidhm leo a áirithiú go gcomhlíonann córais intleachta saorga ardriosca nó samhlacha intleachta saorga ilchuspóireacha a chuirtear ar an margadh nó a chuirtear i mbun seirbhíse san Aontas na ceanglais ábhartha nó oibleagáidí a leagtar síos sa Rialachán seo.

Iarrfaidh an Coimisiún ar na heagraíochtaí Eorpacha um chaighdeánú fianaise a sholáthar maidir lena ndícheall na cuspóirí dá dtagraítear sa chéad fhomhír agus sa dara fomhír den mhír seo a chomhlíonadh i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 24 de Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 1025/2012.

Iarrfaidh an Coimisiún ar na heagraíochtaí Eorpacha um chaighdeánú, i gcomhréir le Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 1025/2012 ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle ( 1 ) agus gan moill mhíchuí, táirgí insoláthartha caighdeánúcháin a fhorbairt, lena n-áirítear, de réir mar is iomchuí, caighdeáin chomhchuibhithe, chun comhlíonadh comhpháirteach agus toimhde comhréireachta a éascú leis na ceanglais nó na hoibleagáidí a leagtar amach i gCaibidil III, Ranna 2 agus 3 den Rialachán seo, agus leis na ceanglais agus na hoibleagáidí ábhartha a leagtar síos i reachtaíocht chomhchuibhithe an Aontais a liostaítear in Iarscríbhinn I a ghabhann leis an Rialachán seo.
Airteagal 40 3.
Féachfaidh rannpháirtithe an phróisis caighdeánaithe le hinfheistíocht agus nuálaíocht san intleacht shaorga a chur chun cinn, lena n-áirítear trí chinnteacht dhlíthiúil a mhéadú, chomh maith le hiomaíochas agus fás mhargadh an Aontais, agus le rannchuidiú le comhar domhanda maidir le caighdeánú a neartú agus caighdeáin idirnáisiúnta atá ann cheana i réimse na hintleachta saorga atá comhsheasmhach le luachanna, cearta bunúsacha agus leasanna an Aontais á gcur san áireamh, agus leis an rialachas il-gheallsealbhóra lena n-áirithítear ionadaíocht chothrom ar leasanna agus rannpháirtíocht éifeachtach na ngeallsealbhóirí ábhartha uile i gcomhréir le hAirteagail 5, 6, agus 7 de Rialachán (AE) Uimh. 1025/2012 a fheabhsú.

1.1 Tagairtí

1.2 Ceanglais aitheanta

1.3 Caighdeáin ghaolmhara

2. Ceanglais aitheanta

Ceanglais

3. Caighdeáin ghaolmhara

Caighdeáin
SCF Statutory, Regulatory & Contractual Compliance

Description

Mechanisms exist to facilitate the identification and implementation of relevant statutory, regulatory and contractual controls.

Possible Solutions & Considerations

Micro-Small Business (<10 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 1-2

∙ SCF Security, Compliance & Resilience Management System (SCRMS)
∙ Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) solution (e.g., SCFConnect, SureCloud, Ostendio, SimpleRisk, Ignyte, ZenGRC, Galvanize, MetricStream, Archer, etc.)

Small Business (10-49 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 3-4

∙ SCF Security, Compliance & Resilience Management System (SCRMS)
∙ Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) solution (e.g., SCFConnect, SureCloud, Ostendio, SimpleRisk, Ignyte, ZenGRC, Galvanize, MetricStream, Archer, etc.)

Medium Business (50-249 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 5-6

∙ SCF Security, Compliance & Resilience Management System (SCRMS)
∙ Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) solution (e.g., SCFConnect, SureCloud, Ostendio, SimpleRisk, Ignyte, ZenGRC, Galvanize, MetricStream, Archer, etc.)
∙ Steering committee

Large Business (250-999 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 7-8

∙ SCF Security, Compliance & Resilience Management System (SCRMS)
∙ GRC solution (e.g., SCFConnect, Cyturus, SureCloud, SimpleRisk, Ignyte, ZenGRC, Galvanize, MetricStream, Archer, etc.)
∙ Steering committee

Enterprise (> 1,000 staff) / BLS Firm Size Class 9

∙ SCF Security, Compliance & Resilience Management System (SCRMS)
∙ GRC solution (e.g., SCFConnect, Cyturus, SureCloud, SimpleRisk, Ignyte, ZenGRC, Galvanize, MetricStream, Archer, etc.)
∙ Steering committee

SCR-CMM

Level 0 Not Performed

Practices are non-existent, based on the inability to demonstrate an implemented and operational capability. A reasonable person would conclude the control is not being performed.

Level 1 Performed Informally

Compliance (CPL) domain capabilities are ad hoc and inconsistent. Capability criteria associated with this control may include:
▪ Policies, standards & procedures associated with CPL domain capabilities provide limited coverage due to the depth and breadth of the existing documentation.
▪ Compliance management-related activities are decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
▪ Compliance efforts are narrowly-limited to certain compliance requirements.
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity personnel use an informal process to govern statutory, regulatory and contractual compliance obligations.

Level 2 Planned Tracked

Compliance (CPL) capabilities are requirements-driven, but are not standardized across the entity (e.g., local/regional level consistency). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with CPL domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with CPL domain capabilities are documented and maintained by process owners.
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity personnel work with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with CPL domain capabilities to address applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD).
▪ Compliance management controls-related controls are primarily administrative and preventative in nature (e.g., policies, standards and procedures & guidelines).
▪ Compliance management may be a defined function (e.g., team or department) or assigned as an additional duty to existing IT and/or cybersecurity personnel.
▪ External compliance requirements for cybersecurity and data privacy are identified and documented, based on applicable laws, regulations and contractual obligations.
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity perform an informal annual review of existing compliance requirements and research evolving or new requirements.

Level 3 Well Defined

Compliance (CPL) capabilities are standardized across the entity for applicability to People, Processes, Technologies, Data and/or Facilities (PPTDF) to ensure consistency for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with CPL domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with CPL domain capabilities are well-documented and kept current by process owners.
▪ A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function, is appropriately staffed and supported to implement and maintain CPL domain capabilities.
▪ Technology is leveraged to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of governance, risk management and compliance operations (e.g., GRC platform).
▪ The entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function, works with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with CPL domain capabilities to address Minimum Compliance Requirements (MCR) (e.g., applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements) and Discretionary Security Requirements (DSR) (e.g., entity-required controls).
▪ An implemented and operational capability exists to facilitate the identification and implementation of relevant statutory, regulatory and contractual controls.

Level 4 Quantitatively Controlled

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ While it may be possible to develop “metrics-driven” capabilities for this control, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.

Level 5 Continuously Improving

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 or Level 4 (if available) criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ Level 5 capabilities should be considered “world-class” where the control builds on Level 4 capabilities, but are continuously improving through Artificial Intelligence (AI) and/or Machine Learning (ML) technologies.
▪ While it may be possible to develop responsive capabilities for this control through the use of AI and/or ML technologies, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.