+Guidelines on the Incremental Default and Migration Risk Charge (IRC) (EBA/GL/2012/03)
---+III. EBA Guidelines on the IRC
------+1. This document contains guidelines issued pursuant to Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 …
------+2. Guidelines set out the EBA‟s view of appropriate supervisory practices within the European …
------+3. According to Article 16(3) of the EBA Regulation, competent authorities must notify the EBA as …
------+4. The notification of competent authorities mentioned in the previous paragraph shall be published …
---+Contents
------+1. Subject matter
------+2. Institutional scope and level of application
---------+1. Competent authorities should require the institutions mentioned in paragraph 2 below to comply …
---------+2. These Guidelines should apply to institutions using an Internal Model Approach (IMA) for the …
---------+3. The guidelines apply to institutions at the level (solo and/or consolidated) on which the …
------+A. Material scope of application
------+4. Positions subject to calculation of the IRC
---------+1. Calculation of the IRC should include all long and short positions subject to a modelled charge …
---------+2. In particular, the following positions should be included, if they are part of the trading book …
---------+3. Positions resulting from the application of the look-through approach to the shares of …
---------+4. The following positions are not considered securitisations and should therefore be included in …
---------+5. Positions in defaulted debt held in the trading book should, where material, be included in the …
---------+6. The definition of default in the case of paragraph 5 above, should be consistent with the …
------+5. Positions not subject to calculation of the IRC
------+6. Positions in equity and equity derivatives
---------+1. Competent authorities may allow the inclusion in the IRC of listed equity positions and …
---------+2. If a listed equity or a derivative instrument based on listed equity is included in the …
---------+3. Notwithstanding the inclusion in the IRC of positions in listed equity or in derivative …
------+7. Positions in the institution’s own debt
---------+1. Long positions in the institution‟s own debt, which may arise from trading or market-making …
---------+2. Short positions in the institution‟s own debt, which may arise from the inclusion in the trading …
------+8. Permanent partial use
---------+1. Where use is made of the provisions of the CRD on the permanent partial use, the rationale for …
---------+2. Permanent partial use of the IRC should not apply to sovereign bonds and derivative products …
------+B. Individual Modelling
------+9. Soundness standard comparable to IRB
------+10. Qualitative criteria
------+11. Source of ratings
---------+1. Institutions‟ IRC approaches may rely on either internal or external ratings. Internal ratings …
---------+2. Institutions should have procedures in place for inferring a rating for non-rated positions. …
---------+3. An institution should have in place a documented hierarchy of sources of ratings for determining …
------+12. Source of PDs and LGDs
---------+1. Where an institution has approved PD estimates or PD and LGD, estimates as part of the internal …
---------+2. Where , in the latter cases, an institution does not have approved IRB PDs and/or LGDs or where …
---------+3. Risk neutral PDs should not be acceptable as estimates of observed (historical) PDs for the …
---------+4. Alternatively, the use of PDs and LGDs provided by external sources (e.g. rating agencies) may …
---------+5. Institutions should establish a hierarchy ranking their preferred sources for their PDs and …
------+C. Interdependence
------+13. Correlations between default and migration events
------+14. Copula assumptions
------+15. Systemic risk factors
---------+1. Although interdependence between issuers is frequently modelled in a similar way to the …
---------+2. If the model assumes different liquidity horizons, the evolution of systemic risk factors should …
---------+3. The correlation between systemic risk factor(s) and individual issuer‟s „ability-to-pay process‟ …
---------+4. Where an institution chooses a parametric formula assuming multiple systemic risk factors, thus …
------+16. Portfolio concentration
---------+1. Institutions‟ IRC models should reflect issuer concentrations, which, for example, may arise …
---------+2. An institution has to prove specifically that its approach captures portfolio concentrations …
------+17. Migration matrices
---------+1. Transition matrices for modelling the rating migration process should be based on historical …
---------+2. Separate transition matrices may be applied for specific groups of issuers and specific …
---------+3. When default is modelled as an absorbing state, transition matrices should be adjusted to ensure …
---------+4. Transition matrices, in general, relate to a one-year horizon. Where shorter horizon matrices …
------+18. Constant level of risk assumption over the one-year capital horizon
---------+1. When modelling a constant level of risk over the one-year capital horizon, institutions should …
---------+2. When assuming a one-year constant position, which implies not adopting liquidity horizons …
---------+3. From a modelling perspective, the constant level of risk may be reflected as the replacement of …
---------+4. Modelling a constant level of risk over the one-year capital horizon may be achieved, for …
---------+5. Modelling the ageing of positions should not be allowed in IRC modelling, given the expected …
------+19. Hedging
---------+1. For the purpose of calculating the IRC, institutions may net long and short positions only when …
---------+2. Diversification effects associated with long and short positions may only be recognised by …
---------+3. In order to reflect basis risk appropriately, where this risk is material, valuation for the …
---------+4. Institutions should reflect the impact within the liquidity horizon of maturity mismatches …
------+D. P&L valuation
------+20. Impact of rating change on market prices
---------+1. Institutions may choose any of the approaches available to convert simulated rating variations …
---------+2. With regard to point 18 of these Guidelines, an institution may consistently assume an …
---------+3. If a simulation, e.g. the asset value process, has not resulted in a changed rating, no change …
---------+4. In the case of a rating migration, the variation of market prices should be recalculated. Full …
---------+5. Positions migrating into the default state should be valued on the basis of the recovery rate or …
---------+6. The model should capture divergences arising from differences in credit event definition …
------+21. Computation of P&L
------+E. Liquidity horizon
------+22. The level at which to define liquidity horizons
---------+1. Institutions should define liquidity horizons at a product level rather than on an issuer level. …
---------+2. Nevertheless, given the practical issues with an entirely granular assessment of liquidity …
---------+3. Institutions should, however, monitor and document the range of products linked to each issuer …
------+23. Key criteria for determining the relevant liquidity horizon
---------+1. Institutions should document the criteria used in the determination of the relevant liquidity …
---------+2. A wide range of criteria can indicate the liquidity of a position, based on past experience …
---------+3. At least one of the criteria considered in the determination of a liquidity horizon should be …
---------+4. Positions should be systematically assessed against the criteria chosen and allocated to …
---------+5. The approach applied to link a criterion to a longer or shorter liquidity horizon should be …
------+24. Monitoring liquidity horizons - key indicators of the need for review
---------+1. Liquidity horizons should be reviewed on a regular basis to ensure they remain appropriate …
---------+2. Institutions should consider significant changes in the factors used to determine the liquidity …
---------+3. Over time institutions should monitor and enhance the range of factors used to identify …
------+F. General matters
------+25. Validation
---------+1. Institutions should apply the validation principles in designing, testing and maintaining IRC …
---------+2. The validation process of IRC models should include at least the following principles: i. …
------+26. Use Test
---------+1. An institution should document how the IRC process is reported internally, its resulting …
---------+2. The procedures that, given the judgement of the IRC, lead to potential appropriate corrective …
---------+3. A comparison of the ways internal market risk model outputs are reported, judged, audited and …
------+27. Documentation
---------+1. An institution should document its approach to capturing incremental default and migration risks …
---------+2. Therefore, the calculation of the risk measures generated by the model and the associated data …
------+28. IRC approaches based on different parameters
---------+1. An institution may use an approach to capturing incremental default and migration risks that …
---------+2. The institution should provide all necessary information concerning elements of the …
---------+3. On the basis of the information provided, the competent national supervisor should decide …
---------+4. In order to have its approach recognised as a non-fully compliant IRC approach, an institution …
---------+5. The decision to recognise an institution‟s approach as a non-fully compliant approach is made by …
------+29. Frequency of calculation
---------+1. Calculation of the IRC should be at least weekly. However, institutions can choose to compute …
---------+2. The institution should be able to prove that, on the day of the week chosen for the IRC …
------+30. Date of application
|
English -
European Union -
Financial Industry -
Guidelines on the Incremental Default and Migration Risk Charge (IRC) (EBA/GL/2012/03)
Guidelines on the Incremental Default and Migration Risk Charge (IRC) (EBA/GL/2012/03) https://www.eba.europa.eu/activities/single-rulebook/regulatory-activities/market-counterparty-and-cva-risk/guidelines-incremental-default-and-migration-risk-charge-irc – PDF
1. Forbhreathnú
| Teideal |
Rialáil |
|
III. EBA Guidelines on the IRC
|
Status of these Guidelines
|
|
Contents
|
III. EBA Guidelines on the IRC ......................................................................................... 7 Title I -Subject matter, Scope and Definitions ..................................................................... 9 1. Subject matter ............................................................................................ 9 2. Scope and level of application ....................................................................... 9 3. Definitions .................................................................................................. 9 Title II - Requirements regarding institutions‟ IRC modelling ........................................ 9 A. Scope of Application ........................................................................................................................ 9 4. Positions subject to calculation of the IRC ....................................................... 9 5. Positions not subject to calculation of IRC ..................................................... 10 6. Positions in equity and equity derivatives ...................................................... 11 7. Positions in the institution‟s own debt .......................................................... 11 8. Permanent partial use ................................................................................ 12 B. Individual Modelling ...................................................................................................................... 12 9. Soundness standard comparable to IRB ....................................................... 12 10. Qualitative criteria ................................................................................... 12 11. Source of ratings ..................................................................................... 12 12. Source of PDs and LGDs ........................................................................... 13 C. Interdependence .............................................................................................................................. 13 13. Correlations between default and migration events ...................................... 13 14. Copula assumptions ................................................................................. 14 15. Systemic risk factors ................................................................................ 14 16. Portfolio concentration ............................................................................. 14 17. Migration matrices ................................................................................... 15 18. Constant level of risk assumption over the one-year capital horizon ............... 15 19. Hedging ................................................................................................. 16 D. P&L valuation .................................................................................................................................... 17 20. Impact of rating change on market prices ................................................... 17 21. Computation of P&L ................................................................................. 18 E. Liquidity horizon .............................................................................................................................. 18 22. The level at which to define liquidity horizons .............................................. 18 23. Key criteriafor determining the relevant liquidity horizon .............................. 19 24. Monitoring liquidity horizons - key indicators of the need for review ............... 20 F. General matters ................................................................................................................................ 20 25. Validation ............................................................................................... 20 26. Use Test ................................................................................................. 21 27. Documentation ........................................................................................ 21 28. IRC approaches based on different parameters ............................................ 22 29. Frequency of calculation ........................................................................... 22 Title III-Final Provisions and Implementation .................................................................... 23 30. Date of application ................................................................................... 23 8 Title I - Subject matter, Scope and Definitions
|
,
1.1 Tagairtí
1.2 Ceanglais aitheanta
1.3 Caighdeáin ghaolmhara
2. Ceanglais aitheanta
Ceanglais
| Foinse |
Ceanglas |
3. Caighdeáin ghaolmhara
Caighdeáin
| Foinse |
Ceanglas |
Saincheisteanna nasctha
- EBA - Published by the European Banking Authority at https://www.eba.europa.eu/
|