+Artikolu 6 Applikazzjoni provviżorja tal-leġislazzjoni u l-għoti provviżorju ta’ benefiċċji
---+Article 6 1.
---+Article 6 2.
---+Article 6 3.
---+Article 6 4.
---+Article 6 5.

Artikolu 6 Applikazzjoni provviżorja tal-leġislazzjoni u l-għoti provviżorju ta’ benefiċċji

Artikolu 6

Applikazzjoni provviżorja tal-leġislazzjoni u l-għoti provviżorju ta’ benefiċċji

(1)  Sakemm mhux previst mod ieħor fir-Regolament implimentattiv, fejn ikun hemm differenza ta’ fehmiet bejn l-istituzzjonijiet jew l-awtoritajiet ta’ żewġ Stati Membri jew aktar dwar id-determinazzjoni tal-leġislazzjoni applikabbli, il-persuna kkonċernata għandha tiġi suġġetta b’mod provviżorju għal-leġislazzjoni ta’ wieħed minn dawk l-Istati Membri, fejn l-ordni ta’ prijorità tiġi ddeterminata kif ġej:

(a) il-leġislazzjoni tal-Istat Membru fejn il-persuna attwalment twettaq l-impjieg tagħha jew taħdem għal rasha, jekk l-impjieg jew l-impjieg għal rasha jitwettaq fi Stat Membru wieħed biss;

▼M2

(b) il-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Istat Membru tar-residenza jekk il-persuna kkonċernata twettaq impjieg jew taħdem għal rasha f’żewġ Stati Membri jew aktar u twettaq parti mill-attività jew attivitajiet tagħha fl-Istat Membru tar-residenza, jew jekk il-persuna kkonċernata ma tkun la impjegata u lanqas taħdem għal rasha;

(c) fil-każijiet l-oħra kollha, il-leġiżlazzjoni tal-Istat Membru, li ntalbet l-applikazzjoni tiegħu l-ewwel jekk il-persuna twettaq attività, jew attivitajiet, f’żewġ Stati Membri jew aktar.

▼B

(2)  F’każ ta’ differenza ta’ fehmiet bejn l-istituzzjonijiet jew l-awtoritajiet ta’ żewġ Stati Membri jew aktar dwar liema istituzzjoni għandha tipprovdi l-benefiċċji fi flus jew in natura, il-persuna kkonċernata li tista’ titlob benefiċċji jekk ma kienx hemm xi kontestazzjoni għandha tkun intitolata, fuq bażi provviżorja, għall-benefiċċji previsti mil-leġislazzjoni applikata mill-istituzzjoni tal-post ta’ residenza tagħha jew, jekk dik il-persuna ma tirrisjedix fit-territorju ta’ wieħed mill-Istati Membri kkonċernati, għall-benefiċċji previsti mil-leġislazzjoni li tapplika l-istituzzjoni li lilha ġiet sottomessa t-talba l-ewwel;

(3)  Fejn ma jintlaħaqx qbil bejn l-istituzzjonijiet jew l-awtoritajiet konċernati, il-kwistjoni tista’ titressaq quddiem il-Kummissjoni Amministrattiva mill-awtoritajiet kompetenti mhux qabel xahar wara d-data li fiha tqajmet id-differenza ta’ fehmiet kif imsemmi fil-paragrafi 1 jew (2) Il-Kummissjoni Amministrattiva għandha tfittex li tirrikonċilja l-fehmiet fi żmien sitt xhur mid-data li fiha l-kwistjoni tressqet quddiemha.

(4)  Fejn jiġi stabbilit jew li l-leġislazzjoni applikabbli mhijiex dik tal-Istat Membru li fih seħħet l-isħubija provviżorja jonkella li l-istituzzjoni li tat il-benefiċċji fuq bażi provviżorja ma kinitx l-istituzzjoni kompetenti, l-istituzzjoni identifikata bħala kompetenti għandha tiġi kkunsidrata bħala kompetenti b’mod retroattiv daqslikieku dik id-differenza ta’ fehmiet ma kinitx teżisti, sa mhux aktar tard mid-data tal-isħubija provviżorja jew mill-ewwel għoti provviżorju tal-benefiċċji kkonċernati.

(5)  Jekk meħtieġ, l-istituzzjoni identifikata bħala kompetenti u l-istituzzjoni li provviżorjament ħallset il-benefiċċji fi flus jew provviżorjament irċeviet kontribuzzjonijiet għandhom jirregolaw is-sitwazzjoni fnanzjarja tal-persuna kkonċernata fir-rigward ta’ kontribuzzjonijiet u benefiċċji fi flus imħallsin provviżorjarment, fejn ikun il-każ, konformement mat-Titolu IV, Kapitolu III, tar-Regolament implimentattiv.

Il-benefiċċji in natura mogħtija provviżorjament minn istituzzjoni taħt il-paragrafu 2 għandhom jitħallsu lura mill-istituzzjoni kompetenti konformement mat-Titolu IV tar-Regolament implimentattiv.

1. Ħarsa ġenerali

,
Titlu Regolamentazzjoni
Article 6 1.

Unless otherwise provided for in the implementing Regulation, where there is a difference of views between the institutions or authorities of two or more Member States concerning the determination of the applicable legislation, the person concerned shall be made provisionally subject to the legislation of one of those Member States, the order of priority being determined as follows:

(a) 

the legislation of the Member State where the person actually pursues his employment or self-employment, if the employment or self-employment is pursued in only one Member State;

▼M2

(b) 

the legislation of the Member State of residence if the person concerned pursues employment or self-employment in two or more Member States and performs part of his/her activity or activities in the Member State of residence, or if the person concerned is neither employed nor self-employed;

(c) 

in all other cases, the legislation of the Member State, the application of which was first requested if the person pursues an activity, or activities, in two or more Member States.

▼B

Article 6 2.
Where there is a difference of views between the institutions or authorities of two or more Member States about which institution should provide the benefits in cash or in kind, the person concerned who could claim benefits if there was no dispute shall be entitled, on a provisional basis, to the benefits provided for by the legislation applied by the institution of his place of residence or, if that person does not reside on the territory of one of the Member States concerned, to the benefits provided for by the legislation applied by the institution to which the request was first submitted.
Article 6 3.
Where no agreement is reached between the institutions or authorities concerned, the matter may be brought before the Administrative Commission by the competent authorities no earlier than one month after the date on which the difference of views, as referred to in paragraph 1 or 2 arose. The Administrative Commission shall seek to reconcile the points of view within six months of the date on which the matter was brought before it.
Article 6 4.
Where it is established either that the applicable legislation is not that of the Member State of provisional membership, or the institution which granted the benefits on a provisional basis was not the competent institution, the institution identified as being competent shall be deemed retroactively to have been so, as if that difference of views had not existed, at the latest from either the date of provisional membership or of the first provisional granting of the benefits concerned.
Article 6 5.

If necessary, the institution identified as being competent and the institution which provisionally paid the cash benefits or provisionally received contributions shall settle the financial situation of the person concerned as regards contributions and cash benefits paid provisionally, where appropriate, in accordance with Title IV, Chapter III, of the implementing Regulation.

Benefits in kind granted provisionally by an institution in accordance with paragraph 2 shall be reimbursed by the competent institution in accordance with Title IV of the implementing Regulation.

1.1 Referenzi

1.2 Rekwiżiti identifikati

1.3 Standards relatati

2. Rekwiżiti identifikati

Rekwiżiti
Sors Rekwiżit

3. Standards relatati

Standards
Sors Rekwiżit
  • Builddate: 01.01.2018 00:00:00 -Doknr: CELEX:32009R0987
  • EULAW -

    EN: Legal acts of the European Union from EUR-Lex, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/. © European Union. Re-use is authorised by Decision 2011/833/EU, provided the source is acknowledged; the consolidated texts are licensed under CC BY 4.0 (EUR-Lex legal notice). Divided into sections and converted into the GRCA format, the wording unchanged. Only the legislation published in the Official Journal of the European Union is deemed authentic.

    DE: Rechtsakte der Europäischen Union aus EUR-Lex, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/. © Europäische Union. Weiterverwendung nach Beschluss 2011/833/EU mit Quellenangabe gestattet; die konsolidierten Fassungen stehen unter CC BY 4.0 (Rechtlicher Hinweis von EUR-Lex). In Abschnitte aufgeteilt und in das GRCA-Format umgewandelt, der Wortlaut unverändert. Verbindlich sind allein die im Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union veröffentlichten Rechtsakte.