+Airteagal 6 Dleathacht na próiseála
---+Airteagal 6 1.
---+Airteagal 6 2.
---+Airteagal 6 3.
---+Airteagal 6 4.
|
Airteagal 6 Dleathacht na próiseála
-
1. Forbhreathnú
| Teideal |
Rialáil |
|
Airteagal 6 1.
|
Ní bheidh an phróiseáil dleathach ach amháin má tá feidhm, agus a mhéid atá feidhm, le ceann díobh seo a leanas ar a laghad:
(a)
tá toiliú tugtha ag an ábhar sonraí a shonraí pearsanta nó a sonraí pearsanta a phróiseáil chun ceann amháin nó níos mó de chríocha sonracha;
(b)
is gá an phróiseáil a dhéanamh chun conradh ar páirtí ann an t-ábhar sonraí a chomhlíonadh nó chun bearta a dhéanamh arna iarraidh sin ag an ábhar sonraí sula ndéanfaidh sé nó sí conradh;
(c)
is gá an phróiseáil a dhéanamh chun oibleagáid dhlíthiúil a bhfuil an rialaitheoir faoina réir a chomhlíonadh;
(d)
is gá an phróiseáil a dhéanamh chun leasanna ríthábhachtacha an ábhair sonraí nó duine nádúrtha eile a chosaint;
(e)
is gá an phróiseáil a dhéanamh chun cúram a chur i gcrích a dhéantar ar mhaithe le leas an phobail nó i bhfeidhmiú údaráis oifigiúil atá dílsithe don rialaitheoir;
(f)
is gá an phróiseáil a dhéanamh chun críocha na leasanna dlisteanacha atá á saothrú ag an rialaitheoir nó ag tríú páirtí, seachas i gcás ina mbeidh sáraíocht ag na leasanna sin ar leasanna nó ar chearta bunúsacha agus ar shaoirsí bunúsacha an ábhair sonraí, lena gceanglaítear go ndéanfar sonraí pearsanta a chosaint, go háirithe más leanbh é an t-ábhar sonraí.
Ní bheidh feidhm ag pointe (f) den chéad fhomhír maidir le próiseáil a dhéanann údaráis phoiblí i gcomhlíonadh a gcúraimí.
|
|
Airteagal 6 2.
|
Féadfaidh na Ballstáit forálacha níos sonraí a choimeád ar bun nó a thabhairt isteach chun cur i bhfeidhm rialacha an Rialacháin seo a oiriúnú i ndáil le próiseáil chun pointe (c) agus pointe (e) de mhír 1 a chomhlíonadh trí chinneadh níos cruinne a dhéanamh maidir le ceanglais shonracha don phróiseáil agus do na bearta eile chun próiseáil dhleathach agus chothrom a áirithiú lena n-áirítear le haghaidh cásanna sonracha próiseála eile dá bhforáiltear i gCaibidil IX.
|
|
Airteagal 6 3.
|
Déanfar an bunús don phróiseáil dá dtagraítear i bpointe (c) agus i bpointe (e) de mhír 1 a leagan síos leis méid seo a leanas:
(b)
dlí Ballstáit a bhfuil an rialaitheoir faoina réir.
Cinnfear críoch na próiseála sa bhunús dlí sin nó, maidir leis an bpróiseáil dá dtagraítear i bpointe (e) de mhír 1, beidh ga léi le haghaidh cúram chur i gcrích a dhéantar ar mhaithe le leas an phobail nó i bhfeidhmiú údaráis oifigiúil atá dílsithe don rialaitheoir. Féadfaidh forálacha sonracha a bheith sa bhunús dlí sin chun cur i bhfeidhm rialacha an Rialacháin seo a oiriúnú, lena n-áirítear na coinníollacha ginearálta lena rialaítear dlíthiúlacht na próiseála sonraí ag an rialaitheoir; an cineálacha sonraí atá faoi réir a bpróiseála; na hábhair sonraí lena mbaineann; na heintitis a bhféadfar na sonraí pearsanta a nochtadh dóibh agus na críocha ar chucu a bhféadfar iad a nochtadh dóibh; an teorannú de réir cuspóra; tréimhsí stórála; agus oibríochtaí próiseála agus nósanna imeachta próiseála, lena n-áirítear bearta chun próiseáil dhleathach agus chothrom a áirithiú, amhail iad sin do staideanna sonracha próiseála eile dá bhforáiltear i gCaibidil IX. Comhlíonfaidh dlí an Aontais nó dlí Ballstáit cuspóir a bhaineann le leas an phobail agus beidh sé i gcomhréir leis an aidhm dhleathach atá á saothrú.
|
|
Airteagal 6 4.
|
I gcás nach bhfuil an phróiseáil chun críche eile seachas an chríoch ar chuici a bailíodh na sonraí pearsanta bunaithe ar thoiliú an ábhair sonraí nó ar dhlí de chuid an Aontais nó ar dhlí Ballstáit atá mar bheart riachtanach agus comhréireach i sochaí dhaonlathach chun na cuspóirí dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 23(1) a choimirciú, déanfaidh an rialaitheoir, d'fhonn fáil amach an bhfuil críoch na próiseála ag luí leis na críocha sin ar chucu a bailíodh na sonraí pearsanta ar an gcéad dul síos, na nithe seo a leanas, inter alia, a chur san áireamh:
(a)
aon nasc idir na críocha ar bailíodh na sonraí pearsanta chucu agus na críocha atá leis an tuilleadh próiseála atá beartaithe;
(b)
an comhthéacs inar bailíodh na sonraí pearsanta, go háirithe maidir leis an ngaol idir na hábhair sonraí agus an rialaitheoir;
(c)
cineál na sonraí pearsanta, go háirithe an ndéantar catagóirí speisialta sonraí pearsanta a phróiseáil, de bhun Airteagal 9, nó an ndéantar sonraí pearsanta a bhaineann le ciontuithe coiriúla agus coireanna a phróiseáil, de bhun Airteagal 10;
(d)
na hiarmhairtí a d'fhéadfadh a bheith ann do na hábhair sonraí ag an tuilleadh próiseála atá beartaithe;
(e)
an bhfuil coimircí iomchuí ann, ar a bhféadfar a áirithiú criptiú a dhéanamh nó ainm bréige a chur i bhfeidhm.
|
,
1.1 Tagairtí
1.2 Ceanglais aitheanta
1.3 Caighdeáin ghaolmhara
2. Ceanglais aitheanta
Ceanglais
| Foinse |
Ceanglas |
3. Caighdeáin ghaolmhara
Caighdeáin
| Foinse |
Ceanglas |
|
SCF
|
Data Subject Opt-In Consent
Description
Mechanisms exist to obtain consent from data subjects to opt-in for the following Personal Data (PD) actions:
(1) Collecting;
(2) Receiving;
(3) Processing;
(4) Storing;
(5) Transmitting;
(6) Sharing; and/or
(7) Updating.
Possible Solutions & Considerations
Micro-Small Business (<10 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 1-2
∙ Obtain opt-in consent before processing personal data
Small Business (10-49 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 3-4
∙ Opt-in consent policy and procedures
Medium Business (50-249 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 5-6
∙ Formal opt-in consent program
∙ Consent records management
Large Business (250-999 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 7-8
∙ Enterprise consent management platform (e.g., OneTrust, Cookiebot)
∙ Consent audit trail
Enterprise (> 1,000 staff) / BLS Firm Size Class 9
∙ Enterprise consent management platform (e.g., OneTrust, TrustArc)
∙ Granular consent management
∙ Automated consent renewal
∙ Consent audit logs
SCR-CMM
Level 0 Not Performed
Practices are non-existent, based on the inability to demonstrate an implemented and operational capability. A reasonable person would conclude the control is not being performed.
Level 1 Performed Informally
SCR-CMM Level 1 criteria definitions are not available for this control:
▪ A reasonable person would conclude this control requires a structured process.
▪ At this level of maturity, the "ad hoc" nature of performing a capability informally would indicate the intent of the control is not met due to a lack of consistency and formality.
Level 2 Planned Tracked
Privacy (PRI) capabilities are requirements-driven, but are not standardized across the entity (e.g., local/regional level consistency). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with PRI domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with PRI domain capabilities are documented and maintained by process owners.
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity personnel work with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with PRI domain capabilities to address applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD).
▪ Data privacy management-related controls are primarily administrative and preventative in nature (e.g., policies, standards and procedures & guidelines).
▪ Data privacy management may be a defined function (e.g., team or department) or assigned as an additional duty to existing IT and/or cybersecurity personnel.
▪ The data privacy program is developed to work with IT and cybersecurity staff to ensure that applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual data privacy obligations for Personal Data (PD) are properly identified and implemented.
Level 3 Well Defined
Privacy (PRI) capabilities are standardized across the entity for applicability to People, Processes, Technologies, Data and/or Facilities (PPTDF) to ensure consistency for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with PRI domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with PRI domain capabilities are well-documented and kept current by process owners.
▪ A data privacy team, or similar function, is appropriately staffed and supported to implement and maintain PRI domain capabilities.
▪ Technology is leveraged to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of data privacy operations (e.g., privacy notice management software and customer management solution).
▪ The entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function, works with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with PRI domain capabilities to address Minimum Compliance Requirements (MCR) (e.g., applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements) and Discretionary Security Requirements (DSR) (e.g., entity-required controls).
▪ An implemented and operational capability exists to obtain consent from data subjects to opt-in for the following Personal Data (PD) actions:
(1) Collecting;
(2) Receiving;
(3) Processing;
(4) Storing;
(5) Transmitting:
(6) Sharing; and/or
(7) Updating.
Level 4 Quantitatively Controlled
Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ While it may be possible to develop “metrics-driven” capabilities for this control, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.
Level 5 Continuously Improving
Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 or Level 4 (if available) criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ Level 5 capabilities should be considered “world-class” where the control builds on Level 4 capabilities, but are continuously improving through Artificial Intelligence (AI) and/or Machine Learning (ML) technologies.
▪ While it may be possible to develop responsive capabilities for this control through the use of AI and/or ML technologies, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.
|
|