+Airteagal 111 Córais intleachta saorga ardriosca a cuireadh ar an margadh nó i mbun seirbhíse cheana féin agus samhlacha intleachta saorga ilchuspóireacha a cuireadh ar an margadh cheana féin
---+Airteagal 111 1.
---+Airteagal 111 2.
---+Airteagal 111 3.
---+Airteagal 111 4.

Airteagal 111 Córais intleachta saorga ardriosca a cuireadh ar an margadh nó i mbun seirbhíse cheana féin agus samhlacha intleachta saorga ilchuspóireacha a cuireadh ar an margadh cheana féin

-

1. Forbhreathnú

,
Airteagal 111 1.
Gan dochar do chur i bhfeidhm Airteagal 5 dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 113(3), pointe (a), déanfar córais intleachta saorga ar comhpháirteanna iad de na córais mhórscála TF arna mbunú leis na gníomhartha dlí a liostaítear in Iarscríbhinn X a cuireadh ar an margadh nó a cuireadh i mbun seirbhíse roimh an 2 Lúnasa 2027 a thabhairt i gcomhréir leis an Rialachán seo faoin 31 Nollaig 2030.

Cuirfear na ceanglais a leagtar síos sa Rialachán seo san áireamh, i gcás inarb infheidhme, sa mheastóireacht ar gach córas mórscála TF a bhunaítear leis na gníomhartha dlí a liostaítear in Iarscríbhinn X agus atá le cur i gcrích de réir mar a fhoráiltear sna gníomhartha dlí sin agus i gcás ina ndéanfar na gníomhartha dlí sin a ionadú nó a leasú.
Airteagal 111 2.
Gan dochar do chur i bhfeidhm Airteagal 5 dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 113, mír 3, pointe (a), ní bheidh feidhm ag an Rialachán seo maidir le hoibreoirí córas intleachta saorga ardriosca, seachas na córais dá dtagraítear i mír 1 den Airteagal seo, a cuireadh ar an margadh nó a cuireadh i mbun seirbhíse roimh dháta chur i bhfeidhm Chaibidil III dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 113, ach amháin más rud é, ón dáta sin ar aghaidh, go mbeidh na córais sin faoi réir athruithe móra ar a ndearaí. I gcás ar bith, déanfaidh soláthraithe agus úsáideoirí gairmiúla córas intleachta saorga ardriosca atá beartaithe lena n-úsáid ag údaráis phoiblí na bearta is gá chun na ceanglais agus na hoibleagáidí a leagtar síos sa Rialachán seo a chomhlíonadh faoin 2 Lúnasa 2030.
Airteagal 111 3.
Déanfaidh soláthraithe samhlacha intleachta saorga ilchuspóireacha a cuireadh ar an margadh roimh an 2 Lúnasa 2025 na bearta is gá chun na hoibleagáidí a leagtar síos sa Rialachán seo a chomhlíonadh faoin 2 Lúnasa 2027.
Airteagal 111 4.
Soláthraithe córas intleachta saorga, lena n-áirítear córais intleachta saorga ilchuspóireacha, a ghineann ábhar sintéiseach fuaime, íomhá, físe nó téacs, a cuireadh ar an margadh roimh an 2 Lúnasa 2026, déanfaidh siad na bearta is gá chun Airteagal 50(2) a chomhlíonadh faoin 2 Nollaig 2026.

1.1 Tagairtí

1.2 Ceanglais aitheanta

1.3 Caighdeáin ghaolmhara

2. Ceanglais aitheanta

Ceanglais

3. Caighdeáin ghaolmhara

Caighdeáin
SCF Product Conformity Governance

Description

Mechanisms exist to ensure developed Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) conform to applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, based on the product's and/or service's:
(1) Use case(s); and
(2) Geographic markets.

Possible Solutions & Considerations

Micro-Small Business (<10 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 1-2

∙ Identify laws/regulations applicable to any developed products (e.g., privacy, accessibility)

Small Business (10-49 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 3-4

∙ Regulatory requirements checklist for product development
∙ Legal review before release

Medium Business (50-249 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 5-6

∙ Product compliance requirements defined at project start
∙ Compliance validation before release
∙ Regulatory conformity records

Large Business (250-999 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 7-8

∙ Product conformity governance program (statutory, regulatory, certification requirements)
∙ Compliance gates in release management
∙ Conformity documentation (e.g., declarations of conformity)

Enterprise (> 1,000 staff) / BLS Firm Size Class 9

∙ Enterprise product compliance program covering statutory/regulatory conformity (e.g., EU CRA, FDA, UL 2900)
∙ Regulatory affairs and product security integration
∙ Conformity assessment and certification management

SCR-CMM

Level 0 Not Performed

Practices are non-existent, based on the inability to demonstrate an implemented and operational capability. A reasonable person would conclude the control is not being performed.

Level 1 Performed Informally

SCR-CMM Level 1 criteria definitions are not available for this control:
▪ A reasonable person would conclude this control requires a structured process.
▪ At this level of maturity, the "ad hoc" nature of performing a capability informally would indicate the intent of the control is not met due to a lack of consistency and formality.

Level 2 Planned Tracked

Technology Development & Acquisition (TDA) capabilities are requirements-driven, but are not standardized across the entity (e.g., local/regional level consistency). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with TDA domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with TDA domain capabilities are documented and maintained by process owners.
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity personnel work with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with TDA domain capabilities to address applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD).
▪ Technology development and acquisition-related controls are primarily administrative and preventative in nature (e.g., policies, standards and procedures & guidelines).
▪ Technology development and acquisition management may be a defined function (e.g., team or department) or assigned as an additional duty to existing IT and/or cybersecurity personnel.
▪ Secure development practices mostly conform to industry-recognized standards for secure engineering of Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) (e.g., OWASP, NIST SP 800-218 and NIST SP 800-160).
▪ An application development team, or similar function, uses a structured process to design, build and maintain secure configurations for test, development, staging and production environments.

Level 3 Well Defined

Technology Development & Acquisition (TDA) capabilities are standardized across the entity for applicability to People, Processes, Technologies, Data and/or Facilities (PPTDF) to ensure consistency for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with TDA domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with TDA domain capabilities are well-documented and kept current by process owners.
▪ A software development team, or similar function, is appropriately staffed and supported to implement and maintain TDA domain capabilities.
▪ Technology is leveraged to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of technology development and acquisition management (e.g., project management software, software escrow solution and software testing tools).
▪ The entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function, works with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with TDA domain capabilities to address Minimum Compliance Requirements (MCR) (e.g., applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements) and Discretionary Security Requirements (DSR) (e.g., entity-required controls).
▪ An implemented and operational capability exists to ensure developed Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) conform to applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, based on the product's and/or service's:
(1) Use case(s); and
(2) Geographic markets.

Level 4 Quantitatively Controlled

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ While it may be possible to develop “metrics-driven” capabilities for this control, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.

Level 5 Continuously Improving

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 or Level 4 (if available) criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ Level 5 capabilities should be considered “world-class” where the control builds on Level 4 capabilities, but are continuously improving through Artificial Intelligence (AI) and/or Machine Learning (ML) technologies.
▪ While it may be possible to develop responsive capabilities for this control through the use of AI and/or ML technologies, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.