+Artigo 111.o Sistemas de inteligência artificial já colocados no mercado ou colocados em serviço e modelos de IA de finalidade geral já colocados no mercado
---+Artigo 111.o 1.
---+Artigo 111.o 2.
---+Artigo 111.o 3.
---+Artigo 111.o 4.

Artigo 111.o Sistemas de inteligência artificial já colocados no mercado ou colocados em serviço e modelos de IA de finalidade geral já colocados no mercado

-

1. Visão geral

,
Artigo 111.o 1.
Sem prejuízo da aplicação do artigo 5.o, tal como referido no artigo 113.o, n.o 3, alínea a), os sistemas de IA que sejam componentes de sistemas informáticos de grande escala criados pelos atos jurídicos enumerados no anexo X que tenham sido colocados no mercado ou colocados em serviço antes de 2 de agosto de 2027 devem ser tornados conformes com o presente regulamento até 31 de dezembro de 2030.

Os requisitos estabelecidos no presente regulamento devem ser tidos em conta na avaliação de cada um dos sistemas informáticos de grande escala criados pelos atos jurídicos enumerados no anexo X, a realizar como previsto nesses atos jurídicos e sempre que esses atos jurídicos sejam substituídos ou alterados.
Artigo 111.o 2.
Sem prejuízo da aplicação do artigo 5.o, tal como referido no artigo 113.o, terceiro parágrafo, alínea a), o presente regulamento só se aplica aos operadores de sistemas de IA de risco elevado, excluindo os sistemas a que se refere o n.o 1 do presente artigo, que tenham sido colocados no mercado ou colocados em serviço antes da data de aplicação do capítulo III a que se refere o artigo 113.o, se, após essa data, os referidos sistemas forem sujeitos a alterações significativas em termos de conceção. Em qualquer caso, os prestadores e os responsáveis pela implantação de sistemas de IA de risco elevado concebidos para serem utilizados por autoridades públicas tomam as medidas necessárias para cumprir os requisitos e as obrigações previstos no presente regulamento até 2 de agosto de 2030.
Artigo 111.o 3.
Os prestadores de modelos de IA de finalidade geral que tenham sido colocados no mercado antes de 2 de agosto de 2025 tomam as medidas necessárias para cumprir as obrigações estabelecidas no presente regulamento até 2 de agosto de 2027.
Artigo 111.o 4.
Os prestadores de sistemas de IA, incluindo os sistemas de IA de finalidade geral, que geram conteúdos sintéticos de áudio, imagem, vídeo ou texto e tenham sido colocados no mercado antes de 2 de agosto de 2026 devem tomar as medidas necessárias para cumprir o disposto no artigo 50.o, n.o 2, até 2 de dezembro de 2026.

1.1 Referências

1.2 Requisitos identificados

1.3 Normas relacionadas

2. Requisitos identificados

Requisitos

3. Normas relacionadas

Normas
SCF Product Conformity Governance

Description

Mechanisms exist to ensure developed Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) conform to applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, based on the product's and/or service's:
(1) Use case(s); and
(2) Geographic markets.

Possible Solutions & Considerations

Micro-Small Business (<10 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 1-2

∙ Identify laws/regulations applicable to any developed products (e.g., privacy, accessibility)

Small Business (10-49 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 3-4

∙ Regulatory requirements checklist for product development
∙ Legal review before release

Medium Business (50-249 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 5-6

∙ Product compliance requirements defined at project start
∙ Compliance validation before release
∙ Regulatory conformity records

Large Business (250-999 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 7-8

∙ Product conformity governance program (statutory, regulatory, certification requirements)
∙ Compliance gates in release management
∙ Conformity documentation (e.g., declarations of conformity)

Enterprise (> 1,000 staff) / BLS Firm Size Class 9

∙ Enterprise product compliance program covering statutory/regulatory conformity (e.g., EU CRA, FDA, UL 2900)
∙ Regulatory affairs and product security integration
∙ Conformity assessment and certification management

SCR-CMM

Level 0 Not Performed

Practices are non-existent, based on the inability to demonstrate an implemented and operational capability. A reasonable person would conclude the control is not being performed.

Level 1 Performed Informally

SCR-CMM Level 1 criteria definitions are not available for this control:
▪ A reasonable person would conclude this control requires a structured process.
▪ At this level of maturity, the "ad hoc" nature of performing a capability informally would indicate the intent of the control is not met due to a lack of consistency and formality.

Level 2 Planned Tracked

Technology Development & Acquisition (TDA) capabilities are requirements-driven, but are not standardized across the entity (e.g., local/regional level consistency). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with TDA domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with TDA domain capabilities are documented and maintained by process owners.
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity personnel work with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with TDA domain capabilities to address applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD).
▪ Technology development and acquisition-related controls are primarily administrative and preventative in nature (e.g., policies, standards and procedures & guidelines).
▪ Technology development and acquisition management may be a defined function (e.g., team or department) or assigned as an additional duty to existing IT and/or cybersecurity personnel.
▪ Secure development practices mostly conform to industry-recognized standards for secure engineering of Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) (e.g., OWASP, NIST SP 800-218 and NIST SP 800-160).
▪ An application development team, or similar function, uses a structured process to design, build and maintain secure configurations for test, development, staging and production environments.

Level 3 Well Defined

Technology Development & Acquisition (TDA) capabilities are standardized across the entity for applicability to People, Processes, Technologies, Data and/or Facilities (PPTDF) to ensure consistency for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with TDA domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with TDA domain capabilities are well-documented and kept current by process owners.
▪ A software development team, or similar function, is appropriately staffed and supported to implement and maintain TDA domain capabilities.
▪ Technology is leveraged to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of technology development and acquisition management (e.g., project management software, software escrow solution and software testing tools).
▪ The entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function, works with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with TDA domain capabilities to address Minimum Compliance Requirements (MCR) (e.g., applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements) and Discretionary Security Requirements (DSR) (e.g., entity-required controls).
▪ An implemented and operational capability exists to ensure developed Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) conform to applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, based on the product's and/or service's:
(1) Use case(s); and
(2) Geographic markets.

Level 4 Quantitatively Controlled

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ While it may be possible to develop “metrics-driven” capabilities for this control, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.

Level 5 Continuously Improving

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 or Level 4 (if available) criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ Level 5 capabilities should be considered “world-class” where the control builds on Level 4 capabilities, but are continuously improving through Artificial Intelligence (AI) and/or Machine Learning (ML) technologies.
▪ While it may be possible to develop responsive capabilities for this control through the use of AI and/or ML technologies, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.