+Security, Compliance & Resilience Outsourcing Limitations
---+Outsourcing Non-Essential Functions or Services

Security, Compliance & Resilience Outsourcing Limitations

Description

Mechanisms exist to ensure organizations involved in developing, implementing and/or maintaining Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) provide assurance of internal oversight capabilities that demonstrate:
(1) Governance of internal controls;
(2) Risk management, including analysis and mitigation activities; and
(3) Compliance with applicable laws, regulations and contractual obligations.

Possible Solutions & Considerations

Micro-Small Business (<10 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 1-2

∙ Vendor due diligence checklist
∙ Third-party security questionnaire (e.g., CAIQ, SIG)

Small Business (10-49 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 3-4

∙ Vendor security questionnaire (CAIQ or SIG)
∙ Third-party risk assessment prior to outsourcing

Medium Business (50-249 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 5-6

∙ Third-party risk management program
∙ Vendor security assessments with contractual security obligations
∙ Contract security requirements for outsourced functions

Large Business (250-999 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 7-8

∙ Third-party risk management (TPRM) program
∙ Vendor SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certification requirements
∙ Contractual security and compliance obligations

Enterprise (> 1,000 staff) / BLS Firm Size Class 9

∙ Enterprise TPRM program with automated vendor risk assessment
∙ Third-party risk ratings (e.g., BitSight, SecurityScorecard)
∙ Contractual oversight and audit rights for outsourced functions

SCR-CMM

Level 0 Not Performed

Practices are non-existent, based on the inability to demonstrate an implemented and operational capability. A reasonable person would conclude the control is not being performed.

Level 1 Performed Informally

SCR-CMM Level 1 criteria definitions are not available for this control:
▪ A reasonable person would conclude this control requires a structured process.
▪ At this level of maturity, the "ad hoc" nature of performing a capability informally would indicate the intent of the control is not met due to a lack of consistency and formality.

Level 2 Planned Tracked

Cybersecurity & Data Protection Governance (GOV) capabilities are requirements-driven, but are not standardized across the entity (e.g., local/regional level consistency). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with GOV domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with GOV domain capabilities are documented and maintained by process owners.
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity personnel work with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with GOV domain capabilities to address applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD).
▪ Governance-related controls are primarily administrative and preventative in nature (e.g., policies, standards and procedures & guidelines).
▪ No formal Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team exists. GRC roles are assigned to existing IT and/or cybersecurity personnel.

Level 3 Well Defined

Third-Party Management (TPM) capabilities are standardized across the entity for applicability to People, Processes, Technologies, Data and/or Facilities (PPTDF) to ensure consistency for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with TPM domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with TPM domain capabilities are well-documented and kept current by process owners.
▪ A procurement team, or similar function, is appropriately staffed and supported to implement and maintain TPM domain capabilities.
▪ Technology is leveraged to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of third-party management operations (e.g., TPRM risk management solution and vendor management solution).
▪ The entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function, works with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with TPM domain capabilities to address Minimum Compliance Requirements (MCR) (e.g., applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements) and Discretionary Security Requirements (DSR) (e.g., entity-required controls).
▪ An implemented and operational capability exists to ensure organizations involved in developing, implementing and/or maintaining Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) provide assurance of internal oversight capabilities that demonstrate:
(1) Governance of internal controls;
(2) Risk management, including analysis and mitigation activities; and
(3) Compliance with applicable laws, regulations and contractual obligations.

Level 4 Quantitatively Controlled

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ While it may be possible to develop “metrics-driven” capabilities for this control, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.

Level 5 Continuously Improving

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 or Level 4 (if available) criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ Level 5 capabilities should be considered “world-class” where the control builds on Level 4 capabilities, but are continuously improving through Artificial Intelligence (AI) and/or Machine Learning (ML) technologies.
▪ While it may be possible to develop responsive capabilities for this control through the use of AI and/or ML technologies, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.

1. Forbhreathnú

Outsourcing Non-Essential Functions or Services

Description

Mechanisms exist to identify non-essential functions or services that are capable of being outsourced to external service providers and align with the organization's enterprise architecture and security standards.

Possible Solutions & Considerations

Micro-Small Business (<10 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 1-2

∙ Identify non-core IT functions suitable for outsourcing (e.g., email hosting)

Small Business (10-49 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 3-4

∙ Documented list of outsourced non-essential functions with security requirements

Medium Business (50-249 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 5-6

∙ Outsourcing decisions aligned with business strategy and risk assessment
∙ Security requirements in outsourcing contracts

Large Business (250-999 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 7-8

∙ Sourcing strategy identifying outsourceable non-essential functions
∙ Third-party risk assessment before outsourcing
∙ Contractual security requirements

Enterprise (> 1,000 staff) / BLS Firm Size Class 9

∙ Enterprise sourcing governance aligned with business strategy and C-SCRM
∙ Outsourcing risk assessments and regulatory notifications where required

SCR-CMM

Level 0 Not Performed

Practices are non-existent, based on the inability to demonstrate an implemented and operational capability. A reasonable person would conclude the control is not being performed.

Level 1 Performed Informally

SCR-CMM Level 1 criteria definitions are not available for this control:
▪ A reasonable person would conclude this control requires a structured process.
▪ At this level of maturity, the "ad hoc" nature of performing a capability informally would indicate the intent of the control is not met due to a lack of consistency and formality.

Level 2 Planned Tracked

Secure Engineering & Architecture (SEA) capabilities are requirements-driven, but are not standardized across the entity (e.g., local/regional level consistency). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with SEA domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with SEA domain capabilities are documented and maintained by process owners.
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity personnel work with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with SEA domain capabilities to address applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD).
▪ Secure engineering and architecture-related controls are primarily administrative and preventative in nature (e.g., policies, standards and procedures & guidelines).
▪ Secure engineering and architecture management may be a defined function (e.g., team or department) or assigned as an additional duty to existing IT and/or cybersecurity personnel.
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity personnel define entity-specific secure engineering practices to protect the Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability and Safety (CIAS) of the entity's TAASD.
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity personnel align secure engineering practices with the entity's broader IT architecture practices.
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity personnel use secure engineering practices to influence Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC).

Level 3 Well Defined

Third-Party Management (TPM) capabilities are standardized across the entity for applicability to People, Processes, Technologies, Data and/or Facilities (PPTDF) to ensure consistency for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with TPM domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with TPM domain capabilities are well-documented and kept current by process owners.
▪ A procurement team, or similar function, is appropriately staffed and supported to implement and maintain TPM domain capabilities.
▪ Technology is leveraged to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of third-party management operations (e.g., TPRM risk management solution and vendor management solution).
▪ The entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function, works with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with TPM domain capabilities to address Minimum Compliance Requirements (MCR) (e.g., applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements) and Discretionary Security Requirements (DSR) (e.g., entity-required controls).
▪ An implemented and operational capability exists to identify non-essential functions or services that are capable of being outsourced to external service providers and align with the organization's enterprise architecture and security standards.

Level 4 Quantitatively Controlled

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ While it may be possible to develop “metrics-driven” capabilities for this control, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.

Level 5 Continuously Improving

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 or Level 4 (if available) criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ Level 5 capabilities should be considered “world-class” where the control builds on Level 4 capabilities, but are continuously improving through Artificial Intelligence (AI) and/or Machine Learning (ML) technologies.
▪ While it may be possible to develop responsive capabilities for this control through the use of AI and/or ML technologies, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.

1.1 Tagairtí

1.2 Ceanglais aitheanta

1.3 Rialacháin ghaolmhara

2. Ceanglais aitheanta

Ceanglais

3. Rialacháin ghaolmhara

Rialacháin
EULAW Airteagal 28 1

1.   Déanfaidh eintitis airgeadais riosca TFC tríú páirtí a bhainistiú mar chomhpháirt lárnach de riosca TFC laistigh dá gcreat bainistíochta riosca TFC dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 6(1), agus i gcomhréir leis na prionsabail seo a leanas:

(a)

maidir le heintitis airgeadais a bhfuil socruithe conarthacha i bhfeidhm acu maidir le húsáid seirbhísí TFC chun a n-oibríochtaí gnó a reáchtáil, beidh iomlán na freagrachta i gcónaí orthu as cloí le gach oibleagáid faoin Rialachán seo agus faoi dhlí seirbhísí airgeadais is infheidhme agus as gach oibleagáid den sórt sin a chomhlíonadh;

(b)

cuirfear bainistíocht riosca TFC tríú páirtí na n-eintiteas airgeadais chun feidhme i bhfianaise phrionsabal na comhréireachta, agus na nithe seo a leanas á gcur san áireamh:

(i)

cineál, scála, castacht agus tábhacht na spleáchas a bhaineann le TFC,

(ii)

na rioscaí a eascraíonn as socruithe conarthacha maidir le húsáid seirbhísí TFC a dhéantar le soláthraithe seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí, agus criticiúlacht nó tábhacht na seirbhíse, an phróisis nó na feidhme faoi seach á cur san áireamh, agus an tionchar féideartha ar leanúnachas agus cáilíocht na seirbhísí agus na ngníomhaíochtaí airgeadais, ar leibhéal aonair agus leibhéal grúpa.
EULAW Airteagal 29 2

2.   I gcás ina n-áireofar sna socruithe conarthacha maidir le húsáid seirbhísí TFC lena dtacaítear le feidhmeanna criticiúla nó tábhachtacha an fhéidearthacht go ndéanfaidh soláthraí seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí fochonrú breise ar sheirbhísí TFC lena dtacaítear le feidhm chriticiúil nó thábhachtach do sholáthraithe seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí eile, measfaidh eintitis airgeadais na tairbhí agus na rioscaí a d’fhéadfadh teacht chun cinn i dtaca le fochonraitheoireacht den sórt sin, go háirithe i gcás fochonraitheoir TFC atá bunaithe i dtríú tír.

I gcás ina mbainfidh socruithe conarthacha le seirbhísí TFC lena dtacaítear le feidhmeanna criticiúla nó tábhachtacha, measfaidh eintitis airgeadais go cuí na forálacha dlí maidir le dócmhainneacht arbh infheidhme iad i gcás fhéimheacht an tsoláthraí seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí chomh maith le haon srianta a d’fhéadfadh teacht chun cinn i leith sonraí an eintitis airgeadais a athshlánú go práinneach.

I gcás ina ndéanfar socruithe conarthacha maidir le húsáid seirbhísí TFC lena dtacaítear le feidhmeanna criticiúla nó tábhachtacha a thabhairt i gcrích le soláthraí seirbhísí tríú páirtí TFC atá bunaithe i dtríú tír, déanfaidh eintitis airgeadais, sa bhreis ar na gnéithe dá dtagraítear sa dara fomhír, comhlíonadh rialacha an Aontais maidir le cosaint sonraí agus forfheidhmiú éifeachtach an dlí sa tríú tír sin a mheas freisin.

I gcás ina bhforálfar sna socruithe conarthacha maidir le húsáid seirbhísí TFC lena dtacaítear le feidhmeanna criticiúla nó tábhachtacha d’fochonraitheoireacht, measúnóidh eintitis airgeadais cibé acu a fhéadfadh nó nach bhféadfadh slabhraí, a d’fhéadfadh a bheith ina slabhraí fochonraitheoireachta fada nó casta, dul i bhfeidhm ar a gcumas faireachán iomlán a dhéanamh ar na feidhmeanna conarthacha agus dul i bhfeidhm ar chumas an údaráis inniúil maoirseacht éifeachtach a dhéanamh ar an eintiteas airgeadais ina leith sin, agus conas a d’fhéadfadh na slabhraí sin dul i bhfeidhm amhlaidh.
EULAW Airteagal 30 1

1.   Leithdháilfear cearta agus oibleagáidí an eintitis airgeadais agus an tsoláthraí seirbhísí tríú páirtí TFC go soiléir agus leagfar amach i scríbhinn iad. Áireofar sa chonradh iomlán na comhaontuithe ar leibhéal seirbhísí agus déanfar é a dhoiciméadú i ndoiciméad scríofa amháin a bheidh ar fáil do na páirtithe ar pháipéar nó i ndoiciméad ag a bhfuil formáid eile in-íoslódáilte marthanach inléite.
EULAW Airteagal 30 2

2.   Beidh na gnéithe seo a leanas ar a laghad sna socruithe conarthacha maidir le húsáid seirbhísí TFC:

(a)

tuairisc shoiléir iomlán ar gach feidhm agus seirbhís TFC atá le soláthar ag an soláthraí seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí, lena dtabharfar le fios an gceadaítear nó nach gceadaítear fochonraitheoireacht ar sheirbhísí TFC lena dtacaítear feidhm chriticiúil nó thábhachtach, nó codanna ábhartha di, agus nuair is é sin an cás, na coinníollacha is infheidhme maidir le fochonrú den sórt sin;

(b)

na suíomhanna, is é sin na réigiúin nó na tíortha, mar a bhfuil na feidhmeanna conarthacha nó fochonarthacha agus na seirbhísí TFC conarthacha nó fochonarthacha le soláthar agus mar a bhfuil sonraí le próiseáil, lena n-áirítear an suíomh stórála, agus an ceanglas go dtabharfaidh an soláthraí seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí fógra don eintiteas airgeadais roimh ré má bheartaíonn sé an suíomh nó na suíomhanna sin a athrú;

(c)

Forálacha maidir le hinfhaighteacht, barántúlacht, sláine agus rúndacht i ndáil le cosaint sonraí, lena n-áirítear sonraí pearsanta;

(d)

forálacha maidir le rochtain, athshlánú agus tabhairt ar ais sonraí pearsanta agus sonraí neamhphearsanta a phróiseálann an t-eintiteas airgeadais, a áirithiú i bhformáid is inrochtana go héasca i gcás dhócmhainneacht, réitigh nó scor oibríochtaí gnó an tsoláthraí seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí, nó i gcás fhoirceannadh na socruithe conarthacha;

(e)

tuairiscí ar leibhéal seirbhísí, lena n-áirítear nuashonruithe agus athbhreithnithe orthu sin;

(f)

an oibleagáid atá ar sholáthraí seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí cúnamh a sholáthar don eintiteas airgeadais gan aon chostas breise, nó ar chostas a chinntear ex ante, i gcás ina dtarlaíonn teagmhas TFC a bhaineann le seirbhís TFC a sholáthraítear don eintiteas airgeadais;

(g)

an oibleagáid atá ar sholáthraí seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí comhoibriú go hiomlán le húdaráis inniúla agus le húdaráis réitigh an eintitis airgeadais, lena n-áirítear daoine arna gceapadh acu;

(h)

cearta foirceanta agus íostréimhse fógraí ghaolmhar chun an conradh a fhoirceannadh, i gcomhréir le hionchais na n-údarás inniúil agus na n-údarás réitigh;

(i)

na coinníollacha maidir le rannpháirtíocht soláthraithe seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí i gcláir feasachta slándála TFC na n-eintiteas airgeadais agus in oiliúint ar athléimneacht dhigiteach oibríochtúil i gcomhréir le hAirteagal 13(6).
EULAW Airteagal 30 3

3.   Áireofar sna socruithe conarthacha maidir le seirbhísí TFC lena dtacaítear le feidhmeanna criticiúla nó tábhachtacha a úsáid, de bhreis ar na gnéithe dá dtagraítear i mír 2, iad seo a leanas ar a laghad:

(a)

tuairiscí iomlána ar leibhéal seirbhíse, lena n-áirítear nuashonruithe agus athbhreithnithe orthu sin, agus spriocanna feidhmíochta beachta cainníochtúla agus cáilíochtúla laistigh de na leibhéil seirbhíse chomhaontaithe ag gabháil leo chun gur féidir leis an eintiteas airgeadais faireachán éifeachtach a dhéanamh ar sheirbhísí TFC agus chun gur féidir gníomhaíochtaí ceartaitheacha iomchuí a dhéanamh gan moill mhíchuí i gcás nach gcomhlíonfar leibhéil seirbhíse chomhaontaithe;

(b)

tréimhsí fógra agus oibleagáidí tuairiscithe an tsoláthraí seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí don eintiteas airgeadais, lena n-áirítear fógra faoi aon fhorbairt a d’fhéadfadh tionchar ábhartha a imirt ar chumas an tsoláthraí seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí na seirbhísí TFC lena dtacaítear le feidhmeanna criticiúla nó tábhachtacha a sholáthar go héifeachtach i gcomhréir le leibhéil seirbhíse chomhaontaithe;

(c)

ceanglais ar an soláthraí seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí pleananna teagmhasacha gnó a chur chun feidhme agus a thástáil agus bearta, uirlisí agus beartais slándála TFC a bheith i bhfeidhm aige lena soláthraítear leibhéal iomchuí slándála lena bhféadfadh an t-eintiteas airgeadais seirbhísí a sholáthar i gcomhréir lena chreat rialála;

(d)

oibleagáid an tsoláthraí seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí a bheith rannpháirteach agus comhoibriú go hiomlán in TLPT an eintitis airgeadais dá dtagraítear in Airteagail 26 agus 27;

(e)

an ceart chun faireachán a dhéanamh ar bhonn leanúnach ar fheidhmíocht an tsoláthraí seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí, a mbíonn an méid a leanas i gceist:

(i)

cearta rochtana, cigireachta agus iniúchóireachta gan srian a bheith ag an eintiteas airgeadais nó ag tríú páirtí arna cheapadh, agus ag an údarás inniúil, agus an ceart chun cóipeanna de dhoiciméadacht ábhartha a dhéanamh ar an láthair má tá siad ríthábhachtach d’oibríochtaí an tsoláthraí seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí, ar ceart é nach mbeidh a fheidhmiú éifeachtach faoi bhac ná faoi theorainn socruithe conarthacha eile ná faoi theorainn bheartas cur chun feidhme eile;

(ii)

an ceart chun teacht ar chomhaontú maidir le leibhéil dearbhaithe mhalartacha má dhéantar difear do chearta cliant eile;

(iii)

an oibleagáid ar an soláthraí seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí comhoibriú go hiomlán le linn na gcigireachtaí agus na n-iniúchtaí ar an láthair arna ndéanamh ag na húdaráis inniúla, ag an bPríomh-Fhormhaoirseoir, ag eintiteas airgeadais nó ag tríú páirtí ceaptha; agus

(iv)

an oibleagáid sonraí a sholáthar maidir leis an raon feidhme, na nósanna imeachta atá le leanúint agus minicíocht na gcigireachtaí agus na n-iniúchtaí sin;

(f)

straitéisí scoir, go háirithe idirthréimhse leordhóthanach éigeantach a bhunú:

(i)

leanfaidh an soláthraí seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí de na feidhmeanna nó seirbhísí TFC faoi seach a sholáthar lena linn d’fhonn an riosca suaitheadh ag an eintiteas airgeadais a laghdú nó d’fhonn a réiteach agus a athstruchtúrú éifeachtach a áirithiú;

(ii)

rud lena bhfágfaidh go mbeidh an t-eintiteas airgeadais in ann aistriú chuig soláthraí seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí eile nó athrú chuig réitigh inmheánacha i gcomhréir le castacht na seirbhíse arna soláthar.

Féadfaidh an soláthraí seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí agus an t-eintiteas ar micrifhiontar é a chomhaontú, de mhaolú ar phointe (e), go bhféadfar cearta rochtana, cigireachta agus iniúchóireachta an eintitis airgeadais a tharmligean chuig tríú páirtí neamhspleách, arna cheapadh ag an soláthraí seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí, agus go bhféadfaidh an t-eintiteas airgeadais faisnéis agus dearbhú maidir le feidhmíocht an tsoláthraí seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí a iarraidh ar an tríú páirtí am ar bith.
EULAW Airteagal 30 4

4.   Agus idirbheartaíocht á déanamh i leith socruithe conarthacha, measfaidh eintitis airgeadais agus soláthraithe seirbhísí TFC tríú páirtí úsáid a bhaint as clásail chonarthacha chaighdeánacha a fhorbróidh údaráis phoiblí le haghaidh seirbhísí sonracha.
EULAW Airteagal 21 Bearta bainistíochta riosca cibearshlándála
-

Saincheisteanna nasctha

Naisc
is related to Annual
is related to relative Control Weighting = 10
is related to Process
is related to Identify
is related to SCRM Focus Tier 1 STRATEGIC
is related to SCRM Focus Tier 2 OPERATIONAL
is related to SCRM Focus Tier 3 TACTICAL
blocks Loss of Accountability / Attribution
blocks Excessive or Unauthorized Privilege
blocks Unauthorized Privilege Elevation
blocks Unauthorized Access
blocks Loss, Theft or Damage of Assets
blocks Unauthorized Modification / Loss of System Integrity
blocks Unauthorized Retention / Inability to Dispose of Data
blocks Business / Service Interruption
blocks Data Loss / Integrity Compromise
blocks Reduced Operational Productivity
blocks System / Data Compromise (Technical Vector)
blocks System / Data Compromise (Non-Technical Vector)
blocks Revenue Loss
blocks Contractual Default / Termination
blocks Loss of Competitive Advantage
blocks Reputational Harm / Loss of Stakeholder Trust
blocks Regulatory / Legal / Contractual Financial Liability
blocks Exposure from Unaddressed Vulnerabilities
blocks System / Service Compromise
blocks Failure to Support Business / Mission Objectives
blocks Unaddressed Security / Compliance Exposure
blocks Unperformed / Unowned Control Responsibilities
blocks Uncontrolled Internal Security / Privacy Exposure
blocks Uncontrolled Third-Party Security / Privacy Exposure
blocks Lack of oversight of internal controls
blocks Lack of oversight of third-party controls
blocks Loss of Investigative / Evidentiary Capability
blocks Delayed Containment / Increased Incident Impact
blocks Incident Persistence / Recurrence
blocks Incident Response / Recovery Cost
blocks Undetected / Delayed Detection of Adverse Activity
blocks Third-Party Cybersecurity Compromise / Exposure
blocks Third-Party Physical Security Disruption / Exposure
blocks Sub-Tier / Fourth-Party Supply Chain Exposure
blocks Third-Party Legal / Compliance Exposure
blocks Harm from Unauthorized / Unintended Product or Service Use
blocks Third-Party Dependency Failure
is related to relative Control Weighting = 07
is related to Govern
blocks Loss of Authorization / Certification / License
blocks Inability to Demonstrate Due Diligence / Due Care
blocks Unreliable Assurance / Decision Information
blocks Concentration / Single-Point Dependency Failure
blocks Counterfeit / Non-Conforming Component Impact
blocks Loss of Confidentiality
blocks Drought & Water Shortage
blocks Earthquakes
blocks Fire & Wildfires
blocks Floods
blocks Hurricanes & Tropical Storms
blocks Landslides & Debris Flow
blocks Pandemic (Disease) Outbreaks
blocks Severe Weather
blocks Space Weather
blocks Thunderstorms & Lightning
blocks Tornadoes
blocks Tsunamis
blocks Volcanoes
blocks Winter Storms & Extreme Cold
blocks Malicious Cyber Activity
blocks Dysfunctional Management Practices
blocks Human Error
blocks Statutory / Regulatory / Contractual Change
blocks Data Quality Degradation / Data Poisoning
blocks Fraud, Corruption and/or Intentional Criminal Conduct
blocks Conflict of Interest (COI) / Undue Influence / Insider Misconduct
blocks Economic Shock / Market Disruption
blocks Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
blocks Geopolitical Conflict / Government Intervention
blocks Sanctions / Trade Restriction Disruption
blocks Supplier Financial Distress / Insolvency
blocks Workforce Shortage / Loss of Critical Skills / Labor Disruption
blocks Loss of Authorization / Certification / License
blocks Inability to Demonstrate Due Diligence / Due Care
blocks Unreliable Assurance / Decision Information
blocks Concentration / Single-Point Dependency Failure
blocks Counterfeit / Non-Conforming Component Impact
blocks Loss of Confidentiality
blocks Drought & Water Shortage
blocks Earthquakes
blocks Fire & Wildfires
blocks Floods
blocks Hurricanes & Tropical Storms
blocks Landslides & Debris Flow
blocks Pandemic (Disease) Outbreaks
blocks Severe Weather
blocks Space Weather
blocks Thunderstorms & Lightning
blocks Tornadoes
blocks Tsunamis
blocks Volcanoes
blocks Winter Storms & Extreme Cold
blocks Malicious Cyber Activity
blocks Dysfunctional Management Practices
blocks Human Error
blocks Statutory / Regulatory / Contractual Change
blocks Data Quality Degradation / Data Poisoning
blocks Fraud, Corruption and/or Intentional Criminal Conduct
blocks Conflict of Interest (COI) / Undue Influence / Insider Misconduct
blocks Economic Shock / Market Disruption
blocks Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
blocks Geopolitical Conflict / Government Intervention
blocks Sanctions / Trade Restriction Disruption
blocks Supplier Financial Distress / Insolvency
blocks Workforce Shortage / Loss of Critical Skills / Labor Disruption
blocks Loss of Authorization / Certification / License
blocks Inability to Demonstrate Due Diligence / Due Care
blocks Unreliable Assurance / Decision Information
blocks Concentration / Single-Point Dependency Failure
blocks Counterfeit / Non-Conforming Component Impact
blocks Loss of Confidentiality
blocks Drought & Water Shortage
blocks Earthquakes
blocks Fire & Wildfires
blocks Floods
blocks Hurricanes & Tropical Storms
blocks Landslides & Debris Flow
blocks Pandemic (Disease) Outbreaks
blocks Severe Weather
blocks Space Weather
blocks Thunderstorms & Lightning
blocks Tornadoes
blocks Tsunamis
blocks Volcanoes
blocks Winter Storms & Extreme Cold
blocks Malicious Cyber Activity
blocks Dysfunctional Management Practices
blocks Human Error
blocks Statutory / Regulatory / Contractual Change
blocks Data Quality Degradation / Data Poisoning
blocks Fraud, Corruption and/or Intentional Criminal Conduct
blocks Conflict of Interest (COI) / Undue Influence / Insider Misconduct
blocks Economic Shock / Market Disruption
blocks Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI)
blocks Geopolitical Conflict / Government Intervention
blocks Sanctions / Trade Restriction Disruption
blocks Supplier Financial Distress / Insolvency
blocks Workforce Shortage / Loss of Critical Skills / Labor Disruption
is blocked by TPM-05 Security, Compliance & Resilience Outsourcing Limitations – Assessment Procedure
  • Secure Controls Framework -

    The Secure Controls Framework® (SCF)

    "The SCF is the Common Controls Framework™ (CCF), the world's most comprehensive cybersecurity and data privacy metaframework - it is also free to use. The entire concept is building secure, compliant and resilient capabilities in the most efficient and cost-effective manner possible.

    The SCF is more than just a unified control catalog, since its included content creates a playbook for Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) capabilities. Used globally by organizations of every size, the SCF is a robust and scalable solution for security, compliance and resilience controls. As a comprehensive security framework, the SCF maps 1,400+ controls across 200+ laws, regulations, and industry frameworks so you can implement once and comply everywhere.

    Like it or not, cybersecurity is a protracted war on an asymmetric battlefield, where the threats are everywhere and as defenders we have to make the effort to work together to help improve cybersecurity and data privacy practices, since we all suffer when massive data breaches occur or when cyber attacks have physical impacts. Hackers share information on attack methods with other hackers, so why shouldn’t the good guys share information on how to best protect an organization? We decided to take action and make a difference, since we feel it is too important to wait for someone else to fix the problems that exist.

    The SCF is made up of volunteers, mainly specialists within the cybersecurity profession, who focus on GRC and the cybersecurity side of data privacy. These are auditors, engineers, architects, incident responders, consultants and other specialists who live and breathe these topics on a daily basis. The end product is "expert-derived content" that makes up the SCF." https://securecontrolsframework.com/ 

    Terms & Conditions

    The SCF End User License Agreement (EULA) governs the use of the Secure Controls Framework® (SCF) under the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License.