+Article 5 Overview of the assessment of qualitative requirements
---+Article 5 (a)
---+Article 5 (b)
---+Article 5 (c)
---+Article 5 (d)
---+Article 5 (e)
---+Article 5 (f)
---+Article 5 (g)
---+Article 5 (h)
---+Article 5 (i)
---+Article 5 (j)
---+Article 5 (k)
---+Article 5 (l)
---+Article 5 (m)
---+Article 5 2
|
Article 5 Overview of the assessment of qualitative requirements
When assessing an institution’s compliance with the qualitative requirements set out in Article 325bi of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, competent authorities shall:
1. Panoramica
| Titolo |
Regolamentazione |
|
Article 5 (a)
|
verify whether the institution has a clear organisational structure for the governance and management of the market risk model, including well defined, transparent and appropriate lines of responsibility;
|
|
Article 5 (b)
|
verify whether the decision-making process of the institution regarding all aspects of market risk internal models is clearly established in the institution’s internal documentation;
|
|
Article 5 (c)
|
verify, in accordance with Article 6:
|
(i)
|
the adequacy of the composition of the senior management and the management body;
|
|
(ii)
|
the role of the senior management and the management body;
|
|
|
Article 5 (d)
|
verify, in accordance with Article 7, whether the set-up of the trading desks for which the institution is in the process of being granted the approval, or has already obtained the approval, is adequate;
|
|
Article 5 (e)
|
assess, in accordance with Article 8, the internal governance and oversight of the institution in relation to the risk control unit;
|
|
Article 5 (f)
|
assess, in accordance with Article 9, whether the internal policy is adequate for the introduction of new products;
|
|
Article 5 (g)
|
verify, in accordance with Article 10, whether the internal model is reviewed independently;
|
|
Article 5 (h)
|
assess:
|
(i)
|
in accordance with Article 11, the adequacy of the internal validation process and of its outcome;
|
|
(ii)
|
in accordance with Article 12, the scope of the validation and its completeness;
|
|
|
Article 5 (i)
|
assess, in accordance with Article 13, the adequacy of the internal regular reporting;
|
|
Article 5 (j)
|
assess:
|
(i)
|
in accordance with Article 14, the adequacy of position limits;
|
|
(ii)
|
in accordance with Article 15, the adequacy of the process to update those limits;
|
|
(iii)
|
in accordance with Article 16, the adequacy of the process followed where those limits are breached;
|
|
|
Article 5 (k)
|
assess:
|
(i)
|
in accordance with Article 17, the adequacy ofthe stress testing programme;
|
|
(ii)
|
in accordance with Article 18, the adequacy of reverse stress-testing scenarios and ad-hoc stress-testing scenarios;
|
|
|
Article 5 (l)
|
assess, in accordance with Article 19, the adequacy of the IT systems;
|
|
Article 5 (m)
|
verify, in accordance with Article 20, whether the internal risk-measurement model, including any pricing model, has a proven track record of being reasonably accurate in measuring risks, and does not differ significantly from the models that the institution uses for its internal risk management.
|
|
Article 5 2
|
For the purposes of point (a), competent authorities shall take into account the nature and size of the institution, and the scale and complexity of its activities.
|
,
1.1 Riferimenti
1.2 Requisiti identificati
1.3 Standard correlati
2. Requisiti identificati
Requisiti
| Fonte |
Requisito |
3. Standard correlati
|