+75. pants Tirgus uzraudzība un MI sistēmu kontrole, un savstarpēja palīdzība
---+75. pants 1.
---+Article 75 1a.
---+Article 75 1b.
---+Article 75 1c.
---+Article 75 1d.
---+Article 75 1e.
---+75. pants 2.
---+Article 75 2a.
---+75. pants 3.

75. pants Tirgus uzraudzība un MI sistēmu kontrole, un savstarpēja palīdzība

-

1. Pārskats

,
75. pants 1.

MI birojam ir ekskluzīva kompetence uzraudzīt un panākt šajā regulā paredzēto pienākumu izpildi attiecībā uz šādām MI sistēmām:

a) 

MI sistēmas, kuru pamatā ir vispārīga lietojuma MI modeļi, ja modeli un sistēmu izstrādā viens un tas pats nodrošinātājs vai nodrošinātāji, kas ietilpst tajā pašā uzņēmumā, kurā darbojas arī minētais nodrošinātājs, izņemot:

i) 

MI sistēmas, kas saistītas ar produktiem, uz kuriem attiecas I pielikumā uzskaitītie Savienības saskaņošanas tiesību akti;

ii) 

MI sistēmas, kas minētas III pielikuma 2. punktā;

iii) 

MI sistēmas, ko nodrošina tiesībaizsardzības iestādes, robežu pārvaldības iestādes un finanšu iestādes, ciktāl uz minētajām MI sistēmām attiecas 74. panta 6. punkts; un

iv) 

MI sistēmas, kas minētas III pielikuma 8. punktā attiecībā uz tiesvedību;

b) 

MI sistēmas, kas ir daļa no ļoti lielas tiešsaistes platformas vai ir integrētas šādā platformā, kura saskaņā ar Regulu (ES) 2022/2065 atzīta par ļoti lielu tiešsaistes platformu.

Pirmajā daļā minētā ekskluzīvā kompetence attiecas uz minēto sistēmu nodrošinātājiem. To piemēro minēto sistēmu uzturētājiem tikai tad, ja tie ir arī nodrošinātāji vai ietilpst tajā pašā uzņēmumā, kurā darbojas arī nodrošinātājs.
Article 75 1a.
By way of derogation from Article 73, providers of high-risk AI systems subject to the competence of the AI Office pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Article shall report any serious incidents to the AI Office. Article 73 (2) to (9), shall apply mutatis mutandis. The AI Office shall promptly transmit the relevant information to the market surveillance authority of the Member State in the territory of which the provider or its legal representative is situated.
Article 75 1b.
The authorities involved in the application of this Regulation shall cooperate actively with the AI Office and provide the AI Office the necessary assistance for the exercise of its powers, including, where necessary, in connection with inspections or other enforcement measures carried out in the territory of a Member State. To that end, those authorities shall enjoy the powers provided for pursuant to this Regulation and Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, and where relevant and limited to what is necessary to fulfil their tasks under this paragraph, in accordance with the applicable national procedures.
Article 75 1c.
When taking investigatory or enforcement action in the territory of a Member State that involves access to a public authority’s data or AI system, the AI Office shall be assisted by the relevant market surveillance authority.
Article 75 1d.
Before taking a decision that would have the effect of prohibiting or restricting the AI system being made available or put into service on a national market, or a decision to withdraw or recall the AI system from such market, the AI Office shall, without undue delay, notify the market surveillance authority competent for that market of its intention to take such a decision. The AI Office shall consult the authorities involved in the application of this Regulation, where appropriate, on any matter relating to the application and enforcement of this Regulation.
Article 75 1e.
The AI Office shall be responsible for conformity assessments and tests of AI systems referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article that are classified as high-risk and subject to a third-party conformity assessment pursuant to Article 43 before such AI systems are placed on the market or put into service. Those tests and assessments shall verify that the systems comply with the relevant requirements of this Regulation and may be placed on the market or put into service in the Union in accordance with this Regulation. The Commission shall entrust the performance of those tests or assessments to notified bodies designated in accordance with this Regulation, in which case the notified body shall act on behalf of the Commission. If a notified body to which the Commission has delegated tasks under this paragraph does not perform those tasks adequately, the Commission may withdraw the delegation with immediate effect.

The fees for testing and assessment activities shall be levied on the provider of a high-risk AI system who has applied for a third-party conformity assessment to the Commission. The provider shall pay the costs related to the services entrusted by the Commission to the notified bodies in accordance with this Article directly to the notified body.
75. pants 2.
Ja attiecīgajām tirgus uzraudzības iestādēm ir pietiekams pamats uzskatīt, ka vispārīga lietojuma MI sistēmas, kuras uzturētāji var tieši lietot vismaz vienam nolūkam, kas, ievērojot šo regulu, ir klasificēts kā augsta riska, neatbilst šajā regulā noteiktajām prasībām, tās sadarbojas ar MI biroju, lai veiktu atbilstības izvērtējumus, un attiecīgi informē MI padomi un citas tirgus uzraudzības iestādes.
Article 75 2a.

Where a market surveillance authority has well-founded and sufficient reasons to suspect that a provider or a deployer of an AI system referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article has infringed this Regulation, it may request, through the relevant single point of contact designated in accordance with Article 70(2), the AI Office to assess the matter in order to take the necessary supervisory and enforcement measures to ensure prompt compliance with this Regulation. Such a request shall be duly reasoned and shall include at least:

(a) 

the name of the provider or the deployer concerned;

(b) 

a description of the relevant facts, the provisions of this Regulation that have allegedly been infringed, and any well-founded and sufficient reasons for suspecting an infringement, including, where applicable, the description of the negative effects of the alleged infringement;

(c) 

the market surveillance authority making the request.

The AI Office shall take utmost account of the request and the market surveillance authority shall cooperate actively and provide the AI Office the necessary assistance for the exercise of its powers in accordance with paragraph 1a.

The AI Office shall, without undue delay and in any event no later than four months following receipt of the request, inform the single point of contact of its intention to exercise its powers in accordance with Article 75a or of its reasons for not exercising its powers. If the AI Office decides to exercise its powers in accordance with Article 75a, it shall periodically inform that single point of contact about major developments in the proceedings and the outcome of such proceedings, without disclosing any confidential information.
75. pants 3.
Ja tirgus uzraudzības iestāde nespēj pabeigt izmeklēšanu par augsta riska MI sistēmu, jo tā nespēj piekļūt konkrētai informācijai, kas saistīta ar MI modeli, neraugoties uz to, ka tā ir darījusi visu iespējamo, lai iegūtu minēto informāciju, tā var iesniegt pamatotu pieprasījumu MI birojam, kas panāk piekļuves nodrošināšanu minētajai informācijai. Minētajā gadījumā MI birojs nekavējoties un jebkurā gadījumā 30 dienu laikā sniedz pieprasījuma iesniedzējai iestādei jebkuru informāciju, ko MI birojs uzskata par būtisku, lai noteiktu, vai augsta riska MI sistēma ir neatbilstīga. Tirgus uzraudzības iestādes nodrošina iegūtās informācijas konfidencialitāti saskaņā ar šīs regulas 78. pantu. Regulas (ES) 2019/1020 VI nodaļā paredzēto procedūru piemēro mutatis mutandis.

1.1 Atsauces

1.2 Identificētās prasības

1.3 Saistītie standarti

2. Identificētās prasības

Prasības

3. Saistītie standarti

Standarti