+ICT Risk management framework
|
ICT Risk management framework
A sound, comprehensive and well-documented ICT risk management framework is in place. Which as goal to address all ICT risks properly and ensure a high level of digital resilience. The reponsibility for risk management is properly assigned to a control function.
The ICT risk management framework shall be documented and reviewed at least annually, or periodically for microenterprises, with immediate reviews triggered by major ICT-related incidents or supervisory feedback. Continuous improvement will be ensured by incorporating lessons learned from implementation, monitoring, and audits. The report of the review will be prepared according to the requirements as stated in chapter 5 (Article 27) of the RTS RM and will be made available for submission to the competent authority upon request.
Assess new standards and relevant technology developments in the field of information security, cybersecurity and resilience on a continuous basis and make proposals on how they can strengthen the information security and cybersecurity control measures of the institution.
1. Pregled
1.1 Sklici
1.2 Ugotovljene zahteve
1.3 Povezani predpisi
2. Ugotovljene zahteve
3. Povezani predpisi
Predpisi
| Vir |
Regulativa |
|
EULAW
|
Article 6 1
1. Financial entities shall have a sound, comprehensive and well-documented ICT risk management framework as part of their overall risk management system, which enables them to address ICT risk quickly, efficiently and comprehensively and to ensure a high level of digital operational resilience.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 6 2
2. The ICT risk management framework shall include at least strategies, policies, procedures, ICT protocols and tools that are necessary to duly and adequately protect all information assets and ICT assets, including computer software, hardware, servers, as well as to protect all relevant physical components and infrastructures, such as premises, data centres and sensitive designated areas, to ensure that all information assets and ICT assets are adequately protected from risks including damage and unauthorised access or usage.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 6 3
3. In accordance with their ICT risk management framework, financial entities shall minimise the impact of ICT risk by deploying appropriate strategies, policies, procedures, ICT protocols and tools. They shall provide complete and updated information on ICT risk and on their ICT risk management framework to the competent authorities upon their request.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 6 4
4. Financial entities, other than microenterprises, shall assign the responsibility for managing and overseeing ICT risk to a control function and ensure an appropriate level of independence of such control function in order to avoid conflicts of interest. Financial entities shall ensure appropriate segregation and independence of ICT risk management functions, control functions, and internal audit functions, according to the three lines of defence model, or an internal risk management and control model.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 6 5
5. The ICT risk management framework shall be documented and reviewed at least once a year, or periodically in the case of microenterprises, as well as upon the occurrence of major ICT-related incidents, and following supervisory instructions or conclusions derived from relevant digital operational resilience testing or audit processes. It shall be continuously improved on the basis of lessons derived from implementation and monitoring. A report on the review of the ICT risk management framework shall be submitted to the competent authority upon its request.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 6 7
7. Based on the conclusions from the internal audit review, financial entities shall establish a formal follow-up process, including rules for the timely verification and remediation of critical ICT audit findings.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 6 9
9. Financial entities may, in the context of the digital operational resilience strategy referred to in paragraph 8, define a holistic ICT multi-vendor strategy, at group or entity level, showing key dependencies on ICT third-party service providers and explaining the rationale behind the procurement mix of ICT third-party service providers.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 6 10
10. Financial entities may, in accordance with Union and national sectoral law, outsource the tasks of verifying compliance with ICT risk management requirements to intra-group or external undertakings. In case of such outsourcing, the financial entity remains fully responsible for the verification of compliance with the ICT risk management requirements.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 8 1
1. As part of the ICT risk management framework referred to in Article 6(1), financial entities shall identify, classify and adequately document all ICT supported business functions, roles and responsibilities, the information assets and ICT assets supporting those functions, and their roles and dependencies in relation to ICT risk. Financial entities shall review as needed, and at least yearly, the adequacy of this classification and of any relevant documentation.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 9 1
1. For the purposes of adequately protecting ICT systems and with a view to organising response measures, financial entities shall continuously monitor and control the security and functioning of ICT systems and tools and shall minimise the impact of ICT risk on ICT systems through the deployment of appropriate ICT security tools, policies and procedures.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 9 4
4. As part of the ICT risk management framework referred to in Article 6(1), financial entities shall:
|
(a)
|
develop and document an information security policy defining rules to protect the availability, authenticity, integrity and confidentiality of data, information assets and ICT assets, including those of their customers, where applicable;
|
|
(b)
|
following a risk-based approach, establish a sound network and infrastructure management structure using appropriate techniques, methods and protocols that may include implementing automated mechanisms to isolate affected information assets in the event of cyber-attacks;
|
|
(c)
|
implement policies that limit the physical or logical access to information assets and ICT assets to what is required for legitimate and approved functions and activities only, and establish to that end a set of policies, procedures and controls that address access rights and ensure a sound administration thereof;
|
|
(d)
|
implement policies and protocols for strong authentication mechanisms, based on relevant standards and dedicated control systems, and protection measures of cryptographic keys whereby data is encrypted based on results of approved data classification and ICT risk assessment processes;
|
|
(e)
|
implement documented policies, procedures and controls for ICT change management, including changes to software, hardware, firmware components, systems or security parameters, that are based on a risk assessment approach and are an integral part of the financial entity’s overall change management process, in order to ensure that all changes to ICT systems are recorded, tested, assessed, approved, implemented and verified in a controlled manner;
|
|
(f)
|
have appropriate and comprehensive documented policies for patches and updates.
|
For the purposes of the first subparagraph, point (b), financial entities shall design the network connection infrastructure in a way that allows it to be instantaneously severed or segmented in order to minimise and prevent contagion, especially for interconnected financial processes.
For the purposes of the first subparagraph, point (e), the ICT change management process shall be approved by appropriate lines of management and shall have specific protocols in place.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 11 1
1. As part of the ICT risk management framework referred to in Article 6(1) and based on the identification requirements set out in Article 8, financial entities shall put in place a comprehensive ICT business continuity policy, which may be adopted as a dedicated specific policy, forming an integral part of the overall business continuity policy of the financial entity.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 11 3
3. As part of the ICT risk management framework referred to in Article 6(1), financial entities shall implement associated ICT response and recovery plans which, in the case of financial entities other than microenterprises, shall be subject to independent internal audit reviews.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 11 6
6. As part of their comprehensive ICT risk management, financial entities shall:
|
(a)
|
test the ICT business continuity plans and the ICT response and recovery plans in relation to ICT systems supporting all functions at least yearly, as well as in the event of any substantive changes to ICT systems supporting critical or important functions;
|
|
(b)
|
test the crisis communication plans established in accordance with Article 14.
|
For the purposes of the first subparagraph, point (a), financial entities, other than microenterprises, shall include in the testing plans scenarios of cyber-attacks and switchovers between the primary ICT infrastructure and the redundant capacity, backups and redundant facilities necessary to meet the obligations set out in Article 12.
Financial entities shall regularly review their ICT business continuity policy and ICT response and recovery plans, taking into account the results of tests carried out in accordance with the first subparagraph and recommendations stemming from audit checks or supervisory reviews.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 12 1
1. For the purpose of ensuring the restoration of ICT systems and data with minimum downtime, limited disruption and loss, as part of their ICT risk management framework, financial entities shall develop and document:
|
(a)
|
backup policies and procedures specifying the scope of the data that is subject to the backup and the minimum frequency of the backup, based on the criticality of information or the confidentiality level of the data;
|
|
(b)
|
restoration and recovery procedures and methods.
|
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 12 2
2. Financial entities shall set up backup systems that can be activated in accordance with the backup policies and procedures, as well as restoration and recovery procedures and methods. The activation of backup systems shall not jeopardise the security of the network and information systems or the availability, authenticity, integrity or confidentiality of data. Testing of the backup procedures and restoration and recovery procedures and methods shall be undertaken periodically.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 12 3
3. When restoring backup data using own systems, financial entities shall use ICT systems that are physically and logically segregated from the source ICT system. The ICT systems shall be securely protected from any unauthorised access or ICT corruption and allow for the timely restoration of services making use of data and system backups as necessary.
For central counterparties, the recovery plans shall enable the recovery of all transactions at the time of disruption to allow the central counterparty to continue to operate with certainty and to complete settlement on the scheduled date.
Data reporting service providers shall additionally maintain adequate resources and have back-up and restoration facilities in place in order to offer and maintain their services at all times.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 13 3
3. Lessons derived from the digital operational resilience testing carried out in accordance with Articles 26 and 27 and from real life ICT-related incidents, in particular cyber-attacks, along with challenges faced upon the activation of ICT business continuity plans and ICT response and recovery plans, together with relevant information exchanged with counterparts and assessed during supervisory reviews, shall be duly incorporated on a continuous basis into the ICT risk assessment process. Those findings shall form the basis for appropriate reviews of relevant components of the ICT risk management framework referred to in Article 6(1).
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 13 5
5. Senior ICT staff shall report at least yearly to the management body on the findings referred to in paragraph 3 and put forward recommendations.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 13 7
7. Financial entities, other than microenterprises, shall monitor relevant technological developments on a continuous basis, also with a view to understanding the possible impact of the deployment of such new technologies on ICT security requirements and digital operational resilience. They shall keep up-to-date with the latest ICT risk management processes, in order to effectively combat current or new forms of cyber-attacks.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 14 2
2. As part of the ICT risk management framework, financial entities shall implement communication policies for internal staff and for external stakeholders. Communication policies for staff shall take into account the need to differentiate between staff involved in ICT risk management, in particular the staff responsible for response and recovery, and staff that needs to be informed.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 24 1
1. For the purpose of assessing preparedness for handling ICT-related incidents, of identifying weaknesses, deficiencies and gaps in digital operational resilience, and of promptly implementing corrective measures, financial entities, other than microenterprises, shall, taking into account the criteria set out in Article 4(2), establish, maintain and review a sound and comprehensive digital operational resilience testing programme as an integral part of the ICT risk-management framework referred to in Article 6.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 28 2
2. As part of their ICT risk management framework, financial entities, other than entities referred to in Article 16(1), first subparagraph, and other than microenterprises, shall adopt, and regularly review, a strategy on ICT third-party risk, taking into account the multi-vendor strategy referred to in Article 6(9), where applicable. The strategy on ICT third-party risk shall include a policy on the use of ICT services supporting critical or important functions provided by ICT third-party service providers and shall apply on an individual basis and, where relevant, on a sub-consolidated and consolidated basis. The management body shall, on the basis of an assessment of the overall risk profile of the financial entity and the scale and complexity of the business services, regularly review the risks identified in respect to contractual arrangements on the use of ICT services supporting critical or important functions.
|
|
EULAW
|
Article 28 3
3. As part of their ICT risk management framework, financial entities shall maintain and update at entity level, and at sub-consolidated and consolidated levels, a register of information in relation to all contractual arrangements on the use of ICT services provided by ICT third-party service providers.
The contractual arrangements referred to in the first subparagraph shall be appropriately documented, distinguishing between those that cover ICT services supporting critical or important functions and those that do not.
Financial entities shall report at least yearly to the competent authorities on the number of new arrangements on the use of ICT services, the categories of ICT third-party service providers, the type of contractual arrangements and the ICT services and functions which are being provided.
Financial entities shall make available to the competent authority, upon its request, the full register of information or, as requested, specified sections thereof, along with any information deemed necessary to enable the effective supervision of the financial entity.
Financial entities shall inform the competent authority in a timely manner about any planned contractual arrangement on the use of ICT services supporting critical or important functions as well as when a function has become critical or important.
|
|
EULAW
|
Člen 1 Splošni profil tveganja in kompleksnost
Člen 1
Splošni profil tveganja in kompleksnost
Pri razvoju in izvajanju varnostnih politik, postopkov, protokolov in orodij na področju IKT iz naslova II in poenostavljenega okvira za obvladovanje tveganj na področju IKT iz naslova III se upoštevajo velikost in splošni profil tveganja finančnega subjekta ter narava, obseg in elementi povečane ali zmanjšane kompleksnosti njegovih storitev, dejavnosti in poslovanja, vključno z elementi, ki se nanašajo na:
(a)
šifriranje in kriptografijo;
(d)
vodenje projektov IKT in upravljanje sprememb na področju IKT;
(e)
morebitni vpliv tveganja na področju IKT na zaupnost, celovitost in razpoložljivost podatkov ter motenj na neprekinjenost in razpoložljivost dejavnosti finančnega subjekta.
|
|
EULAW
|
Člen 2 1.
Finančni subjekti zagotovijo, da so njihove varnostne politike, informacijska varnost ter povezani postopki, protokoli in orodja na področju IKT iz člena 9(2) Uredbe (EU) 2022/2554 vključeni v njihov okvir za obvladovanje tveganj na področju IKT. Finančni subjekti vzpostavijo varnostne politike, postopke, protokole in orodja na področju IKT iz tega poglavja, ki:
(a)
zagotavljajo varnost omrežij;
(b)
vsebujejo zaščitne ukrepe pred vdori in zlorabo podatkov;
(c)
ohranjajo razpoložljivost, avtentičnost, celovitost in zaupnost podatkov, tudi z uporabo kriptografskih tehnik;
(d)
zagotavljajo natančen in hiter prenos podatkov brez večjih motenj in nepotrebnih zamud.
|
|
EULAW
|
Člen 2 2.
Finančni subjekti za varnostne politike na področju IKT iz odstavka 1 zagotovijo, da:
(a)
so usklajene s cilji glede informacijske varnosti finančnega subjekta, vključenimi v strategijo za digitalno operativno odpornost iz člena 6(8) Uredbe (EU) 2022/2554;
(b)
vsebujejo datum uradne odobritve varnostnih politik na področju IKT s strani upravljalnega organa;
(c)
vsebujejo kazalnike in ukrepe za:
(i)
spremljanje izvajanja varnostnih politik, postopkov, protokolov in orodij na področju IKT;
(ii)
evidentiranje izjem od tega izvajanja;
(iii)
zagotavljanje, da je v primeru izjem iz točke (ii) zagotovljena digitalna operativna odpornost finančnega subjekta;
(d)
določajo odgovornosti zaposlenih na vseh ravneh, da se zagotovi varnost finančnega subjekta na področju IKT;
(e)
določajo posledice neizpolnjevanja varnostnih politik na področju IKT s strani zaposlenih v finančnem subjektu, kadar določbe v zvezi s tem niso določene v drugih politikah finančnega subjekta;
(f)
navajajo dokumentacijo, ki jo je treba hraniti;
(g)
določajo ureditev ločevanja nalog v okviru modela treh obrambnih linij ali drugega notranjega modela obvladovanja in nadzorovanja tveganj, kot je ustrezno, da se prepreči nasprotja interesov;
(h)
upoštevajo vodilne prakse in, kadar je ustrezno, standarde, kot so opredeljeni v členu 2, točka 1, Uredbe (EU) št. 1025/2012;
(i)
opredelijo vloge in odgovornosti za razvoj, izvajanje in vzdrževanje varnostnih politik, postopkov, protokolov in orodij na področju IKT;
(j)
se pregledujejo v skladu s členom 6(5) Uredbe (EU) 2022/2554;
(k)
upoštevajo pomembne spremembe v zvezi s finančnim subjektom, vključno s pomembnimi spremembami dejavnosti ali postopkov finančnega subjekta, okolja kibernetskih groženj ali veljavnih pravnih obveznosti.
|
|
EULAW
|
Člen 3 Obvladovanje tveganj na področju IKT
Člen 3
Obvladovanje tveganj na področju IKT
Finančni subjekti razvijejo, dokumentirajo in izvajajo politike in postopke za obvladovanje tveganj na področju IKT, ki vsebujejo vse naslednje:
(a)
navedbo odobritve tolerančne ravni tveganja za tveganje na področju IKT, določene v skladu s členom 6(8), točka (b), Uredbe (EU) 2022/2554;
(b)
postopek in metodologijo za izvedbo ocene tveganja na področju IKT, v katerih so opredeljeni:
(i)
ranljivosti in grožnje, ki vplivajo ali bi lahko vplivale na podprte poslovne funkcije, sisteme IKT in sredstva IKT, ki podpirajo te funkcije;
(ii)
kvantitativni ali kvalitativni kazalniki za merjenje učinka in verjetnosti ranljivosti in groženj iz točke (i);
(c)
postopek za opredelitev, izvajanje in dokumentiranje ukrepov za obravnavo tveganj na področju IKT za identificirana in ocenjena tveganja na področju IKT, vključno z določitvijo ukrepov za obravnavo tveganj na področju IKT, potrebnih za uskladitev tveganja na področju IKT s tolerančno ravnjo tveganja iz točke (a);
(d)
za preostala tveganja na področju IKT, ki so še vedno prisotna po izvajanju ukrepov za obravnavo tveganj na področju IKT iz točke (c):
(i)
določbe o identifikaciji teh preostalih tveganj na področju IKT;
(ii)
dodelitev vlog in odgovornosti v zvezi s:
(1)
sprejetjem preostalih tveganj na področju IKT, ki presegajo tolerančno raven tveganja finančnega subjekta iz točke (a);
(2)
postopkom pregleda iz točke (iv) te točke (d);
(iii)
pripravo popisa sprejetih preostalih tveganj na področju IKT, vključno z utemeljitvijo njihovega sprejetja;
(iv)
določbe o pregledu sprejetih preostalih tveganj na področju IKT vsaj enkrat letno, vključno z:
(1)
identifikacijo vseh sprememb preostalih tveganj na področju IKT;
(2)
oceno razpoložljivih blažilnih ukrepov;
(3)
oceno, ali so razlogi, ki upravičujejo sprejetje preostalih tveganj na področju IKT, še vedno veljavni in se uporabljajo na datum pregleda;
(e)
določbe o spremljanju:
(i)
vseh sprememb tveganja na področju IKT in okolja kibernetskih groženj;
(ii)
notranjih in zunanjih ranljivosti in groženj;
(iii)
tveganja finančnega subjekta na področju IKT, ki omogoča hitro odkrivanje sprememb, ki bi lahko vplivale na njegov profil tveganja na področju IKT;
(f)
določbe o postopku za zagotovitev, da se upoštevajo vse spremembe poslovne strategije in strategije za digitalno operativno odpornost finančnega subjekta.
Za namene prvega odstavka, točka (c), postopek iz navedene točke zagotavlja:
(a)
spremljanje učinkovitosti izvedenih ukrepov za obravnavo tveganj na področju IKT;
(b)
oceno, ali so bile dosežene določene tolerančne ravni tveganja finančnega subjekta;
(c)
oceno, ali je finančni subjekt sprejel ukrepe za popravek ali izboljšanje navedenih ukrepov, kadar je potrebno.
|
|
EULAW
|
Člen 8 1.
Finančni subjekti v okviru varnostnih politik, postopkov, protokolov in orodij na področju IKT iz člena 9(2) Uredbe (EU) 2022/2554 razvijejo, dokumentirajo in izvajajo politike in postopke za upravljanje delovanja IKT. Te politike in postopki določajo, kako finančni subjekti upravljajo, spremljajo, nadzirajo in obnavljajo svoja sredstva IKT, vključno z dokumentiranjem delovanja IKT.
|
|
EULAW
|
Člen 8 2.
Politike in postopki za delovanje IKT iz odstavka 1 vsebujejo vse naslednje:
(a)
opis sredstev IKT, vključno z vsem naslednjim:
(i)
zahtevami glede varne namestitve, vzdrževanja, konfiguracije in odstranitve sistema IKT;
(ii)
zahtevami glede upravljanja informacijskih sredstev, ki jih uporabljajo sredstva IKT, vključno z njihovo obdelavo in obravnavo, tako avtomatizirano kot ročno;
(iii)
zahtevami v zvezi z identifikacijo in nadzorom obstoječih sistemov IKT;
(b)
kontrole in spremljanje sistemov IKT, vključno z vsem naslednjim:
(i)
zahtevami za varnostno kopiranje in obnovitev sistemov IKT;
(ii)
zahtevami glede časovnega razporejanja ob upoštevanju soodvisnosti med sistemi IKT;
(iii)
protokoli za informacije o revizijski sledi in sistemskem dnevniku;
(iv)
zahtevami za zagotovitev, da izvajanje notranje revizije in drugega testiranja čim bolj zmanjša motnje v poslovanju;
(v)
zahtevami glede ločevanja produkcijskih okolij IKT od razvojnih, testnih in drugih neprodukcijskih okolij;
(vi)
zahtevami za izvajanje razvoja in testiranja v okoljih, ki so ločena od produkcijskega okolja;
(vii)
zahtevami za izvajanje razvoja in testiranja v produkcijskih okoljih;
(c)
obravnavanje napak v zvezi s sistemi IKT, vključno z vsem naslednjim:
(i)
postopki in protokoli za obravnavanje napak;
(ii)
stiki za podporo in prenos na višjo raven, vključno s stiki za zunanjo podporo v primeru nepričakovanih operativnih ali tehničnih težav;
(iii)
postopki za ponovni zagon, povrnitev prejšnjega stanja in obnovitev sistema IKT za uporabo v primeru motenj v sistemu IKT.
Za namene točke (b)(v) se pri ločevanju upoštevajo vse komponente okolja, vključno z računi, podatki ali povezavami, kot se zahteva v členu 13(1), točka (a). Za namene točke (b)(vii) politike in postopki iz odstavka 1 določajo, da so primeri, v katerih se testiranje izvaja v produkcijskem okolju, jasno opredeljeni, utemeljeni, časovno omejeni in odobreni s strani ustrezne funkcije v skladu s členom 16(6). Finančni subjekti zagotovijo razpoložljivost, zaupnost, celovitost in avtentičnost sistemov IKT in produkcijskih podatkov med razvojnimi in testnimi dejavnostmi v produkcijskem okolju.
|
|