+4. Setting the framework of recovery plan indicators
---+16. The framework of recovery plan indicators should be established by institutions and assessed by …
---+17. The recovery plan should contain detailed information on the decision-making process with …
---+18. In defining this framework, institutions should consider that indicator breaches do not …
---+19. Institutions should include recovery plan indicators of both a quantitative and qualitative …
---+20. While setting the quantitative recovery plan indicator thresholds, consistently with its …
---+Categories of recovery plan indicators
------+21. Institutions should include in the recovery plan at least the following mandatory categories of …
------+22. Institutions should include in the recovery plan the two following categories of recovery plan …
------+23. Institutions should include specific recovery plan indicators included in the list per category …
------+24. When an institution is rebutting the presumption as set out in paragraph 23 for any of the …
------+25. Institutions should not limit their set of indicators to the minimum list set out in Annex II …
------+26. The framework of recovery plan indicators should: a. be adapted to the business model and …
---+Requirements for the calibration of recovery plan indicators
------+27. For the calibration of the indicator framework the institution should take into account the …
------+28. An institution should be able to provide the competent authority with an explanation of how the …
------+29. The appropriateness of the calibrations of the recovery plan indicators should be regularly …
------+30. Competent and resolution authorities could decide to implement temporary relief measures in the …
------+31. Competent authorities may agree to the update of the calibration of the recovery plan …
---+Actions and notifications upon breaching an indicator
------+32. For indicator breaches to effectively fulfil their warning potential, in line with internal …
------+33. Where a recovery plan indicator has been breached, the management body of the institution …
------+34. The decision taken by the institution referred to in the previous paragraph should be based on …
------+35. Any action or option taken or considered by the institution following an indicator breach, even …
------+36. The final decision on the potential activation of the recovery plan remains with the …
------+37. For the purposes of the previous paragraph, the competent authority should monitor (i) the …
---+Arrangements for monitoring recovery plan indicators
------+38. The monitoring of recovery plan indicators by the institution should be set at an adequate …
------+39. When requested by the competent authority, the institution should be able to provide it with …

4. Setting the framework of recovery plan indicators

4. Setting the framework of recovery plan indicators

1. Overview

,
Summary Regulation
16. The framework of recovery plan indicators should be established by institutions and assessed by …

The framework of recovery plan indicators should be established by institutions and assessed by the competent authority taking into consideration the criteria laid down in these guidelines.

17. The recovery plan should contain detailed information on the decision-making process with …

The recovery plan should contain detailed information on the decision-making process with regard to the activation of the recovery plan as an essential element of the governance structure, based on an escalation process using the indicators set out in the relevant framework and in accordance with Article 9(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU.

18. In defining this framework, institutions should consider that indicator breaches do not …

In defining this framework, institutions should consider that indicator breaches do not automatically activate a specific recovery option but indicate that an escalation process should be started to decide whether to take action or not.

19. Institutions should include recovery plan indicators of both a quantitative and qualitative …

Institutions should include recovery plan indicators of both a quantitative and qualitative nature.

20. While setting the quantitative recovery plan indicator thresholds, consistently with its …

While setting the quantitative recovery plan indicator thresholds, consistently with its overall general risk management framework in accordance with Article 5(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1075, the institut ion should use progressive metrics (‘traffic light approach’) in order to inform the institution’s management body that such indicator thresholds could potentially be reached.

Categories of recovery plan indicators

Categories of recovery plan indicators

Requirements for the calibration of recovery plan indicators

Requirements for the calibration of recovery plan indicators

Actions and notifications upon breaching an indicator

Actions and notifications upon breaching an indicator

Arrangements for monitoring recovery plan indicators

Arrangements for monitoring recovery plan indicators

1.1 References

1.2 Identified Requirements

1.3 Related Standards

2. Identified Requirements

Requirements
Source Requirement

3. Related Standards

Standards
Source Requirement
  • EBA - Published by the European Banking Authority at https://www.eba.europa.eu/