+Guideline 6: Design and testing to the satisfaction of PSPs

Guideline 6: Design and testing to the satisfaction of PSPs

6.1 For the purpose of evidencing compliance with the requirement in letter (b) of Article 33(6) of the RTS regarding the design of the dedicated interface, the ASPSP should provide the competent authority with:

  • a. evidence that the dedicated interface meets the legal requirements for access and data in PSD2 and the RTS, including:
  • i. a description of the functional and technical specifications that the ASPSP has implemented; and
  • ii. a summary of how the implementation of these specifications fulfils the requirements in PSD2 and the RTS; and
  • b. information on whether, and if so how, the ASPSP has engaged with PISPs, AISPs and CBPIIs.

6.2 For the purpose of these Guidelines, a ‘market initiative’ means a group of stakeholders that have developed functional and technical specifications for dedicated interfaces and, in doing so, have obtained input from PISPs, AISPs and CBPIIs.

6.3 Where the ASPSP is implementing a standard developed by a market initiative:

  • a. the information referred to in point (i) of letter (a) of Guideline 6.1 may consist of information regarding which market initiative standard the ASPSP is implementing, whether or not it has deviated in any specific aspect from such standard, and if so, how it has deviated and how it meets the requirements in PSD2 and the RTS;
  • b. the information referred to in point (ii) of letter (a) of Guideline 6.1 may include, where available, the results of the conformance testing developed by the market initiative, attesting compliance of the interface with the respective market initiative standard.

6.4 For the purpose of the requirement in letter (b) of Article 33(6) of the RTS regarding the testing of the dedicated interface, the ASPSP should make the technical specifications of the dedicated interface available to authorised PISPs, AISPs and CBPIIs or payment service providers that have applied to their competent authorities for the relevant authorisation in accordance with Article 30(3) of the RTS including, at a minimum, publishing a summary of the specification of the dedicated interface on its website in accordance with the third sub-paragraph of Article 30(3) of the RTS.

6.5 The testing facility should allow ASPSPs, authorised PISPs, AISPs and CBPIIs or payment service providers that have applied to their competent authorities for the relevant authorization to test the dedicated interface in a secure, dedicated testing environment with non-real PSU data, for the following:

  • a. a stable and secure connection;
  • b. the ability of ASPSPs and authorised PISPs, AISPs and CBPIIs to exchange the relevant certificates in accordance with Article 34 of the RTS;
  • c. the ability to send and receive error messages in accordance with Article 36(2) of the RTS;
  • d. the ability of PISPs to send, and of ASPSPs to receive, payment initiation orders and the ability of ASPSPs to provide the information requested in accordance with letter (b) of Article 66(4) of PSD2 and letter (b) of Article 36(1) of the RTS;
  • e. the ability of AISPs to send, and of ASPSPs to receive, requests for access to payment account data, and the ability of ASPSPs to provide the information requested in accordance with letter (a) of Article 36(1) of the RTS;
  • f. the ability of CBPIIs and PISPs to send, and of ASPSPs to receive, requests from CBPIIs and PISPs and the ability of the ASPSP to send a ‘yes/no’ confirmation to CBPIIs and PISPs in accordance with letter (c) of Article 36(1) of the RTS; and
  • g. the ability of PISPs and AISPs to rely on all the authentication procedures provided by the ASPSP to its PSUs.

6.6 The ASPSP should provide the competent authority with a summary of the results of the testing referred to in Article 30(5) of the RTS for each of the elements to be tested in accordance with letters (a) to (g) of paragraph 6.5 above, including the number of PISPs, AISPs and CBPIIs that have used the testing facility, the feedback received by the ASPSP from these PISPs, AISPs and CBPIIs, the issues identified and a description of how these issues have been addressed.

6.7 For the purpose of assessing whether the ASPSP meets the requirements in letter (b) of Article 33(6) of the RTS, the competent authority may also take into account any problems reported to it by PISPs, AISPs and CBPIIs in relation to Guideline 6.5 above.

1. Forbhreathnú

,
Teideal Rialáil

1.1 Tagairtí

1.2 Ceanglais aitheanta

1.3 Caighdeáin ghaolmhara

2. Ceanglais aitheanta

Ceanglais
Foinse Ceanglas

3. Caighdeáin ghaolmhara

Caighdeáin
Foinse Ceanglas
  • EBA - Published by the European Banking Authority at https://www.eba.europa.eu/