+Physical Access Control
---+Physical Access Device Inventories
|
Physical Access Control
Description
Physical access control mechanisms exist to enforce physical access authorizations for all physical access points (including designated entry/exit points) to facilities (excluding those areas within the facility officially designated as publicly accessible).
Possible Solutions & Considerations
Micro-Small Business (<10 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 1-2
∙ Physical security policy
∙ Door locks and key management
Small Business (10-49 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 3-4
∙ Physical security policy
∙ Access log
∙ Visitor procedures
Medium Business (50-249 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 5-6
∙ Staffed lobby (receptionist)
∙ Physical security guards
∙ Verify individual access authorizations before granting access to the facility.
∙ Control entry to the facility containing the system using physical access devices and/or guards.
∙ Control access to areas officially designated as publicly accessible in accordance with the organization's assessment of risk.
∙ Secure keys, combinations and other physical access devices.
Large Business (250-999 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 7-8
∙ Staffed lobby (receptionist)
∙ Physical security guards
∙ Verify individual access authorizations before granting access to the facility.
∙ Control entry to the facility containing the system using physical access devices and/or guards.
∙ Control access to areas officially designated as publicly accessible in accordance with the organization's assessment of risk.
∙ Secure keys, combinations and other physical access devices.
Enterprise (> 1,000 staff) / BLS Firm Size Class 9
∙ Staffed lobby (receptionist)
∙ Physical security guards
∙ Verify individual access authorizations before granting access to the facility.
∙ Control entry to the facility containing the system using physical access devices and/or guards.
∙ Control access to areas officially designated as publicly accessible in accordance with the organization's assessment of risk.
∙ Secure keys, combinations and other physical access devices.
SCR-CMM
Level 0 Not Performed
Practices are non-existent, based on the inability to demonstrate an implemented and operational capability. A reasonable person would conclude the control is not being performed.
Level 1 Performed Informally
SCR-CMM Level 1 criteria definitions are not available for this control:
▪ A reasonable person would conclude this control requires a structured process.
▪ At this level of maturity, the "ad hoc" nature of performing a capability informally would indicate the intent of the control is not met due to a lack of consistency and formality.
Level 2 Planned Tracked
Physical & Environmental Security (PES) capabilities are requirements-driven, but are not standardized across the entity (e.g., local/regional level consistency). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with PES domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with PES domain capabilities are documented and maintained by process owners.
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity personnel work with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with PES domain capabilities to address applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD).
▪ Physical security / facilities management-related controls are primarily administrative and preventative in nature (e.g., policies, standards and procedures & guidelines).
▪ Physical security / facilities management may be a defined function (e.g., team or department) or assigned as an additional duty to existing IT and/or cybersecurity personnel.
▪ Physical security controls and technologies primarily focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
▪ Physical security controls and technologies ensure that only authorized personnel are allowed access to secure areas.
▪ A facilities maintenance team, or similar function, manages the operation of automated physical and environmental protection controls.
▪ Physical security controls and technologies are configured to enforce physical access authorizations for all physical access points (including designated entry/exit points) to facilities (excluding those areas within the facility officially designated as publicly accessible).
Level 3 Well Defined
Physical & Environmental Security (PES) capabilities are standardized across the entity for applicability to People, Processes, Technologies, Data and/or Facilities (PPTDF) to ensure consistency for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with PES domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with PES domain capabilities are well-documented and kept current by process owners.
▪ A facilities management team, or similar function, is appropriately staffed and supported to implement and maintain NET domain capabilities.
▪ Technology is leveraged to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of physical and environmental security operations (e.g., facility management solution, visitor log management automation and proximity badge access).
▪ The entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function, works with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with PES domain capabilities to address Minimum Compliance Requirements (MCR) (e.g., applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements) and Discretionary Security Requirements (DSR) (e.g., entity-required controls).
▪ An implemented and operational physical security capability exists to enforce physical access authorizations for all physical access points (including designated entry/exit points) to facilities (excluding those areas within the facility officially designated as publicly accessible).
Level 4 Quantitatively Controlled
Physical & Environmental Security (PES) capabilities, in addition to being standardized across the entity and centrally managed to ensure consistency across Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD), efforts are metrics driven to provide sufficient insight for decision makers to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and/or identify areas for improvement. Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Applicable SCR-CMM Level 3 (Well Defined) capabilities are implemented and operational.
▪ Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
▪ Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
▪ Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
▪ Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
▪ Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
▪ Business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes to evolve capabilities.
Level 5 Continuously Improving
Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 or Level 4 (if available) criteria definitions:
▪ There are no defined Level 5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to operationalize this control.
▪ Level 5 capabilities should be considered “world-class” where the control builds on Level 4 capabilities, but are continuously improving through Artificial Intelligence (AI) and/or Machine Learning (ML) technologies.
▪ While it may be possible to develop responsive capabilities for this control through the use of AI and/or ML technologies, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.
1. Prezentare generală
| Titlu |
Standard |
|
Physical Access Device Inventories
|
Description
Mechanisms exist to maintain an accurate inventory of all physical access devices (e.g., RFID cards, access fobs and door keys).
Possible Solutions & Considerations
Micro-Small Business (<10 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 1-2
∙ Key and badge log (spreadsheet) with holder name
Small Business (10-49 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 3-4
∙ Key/badge inventory with issuance and return records
∙ Periodic reconciliation of issued devices
Medium Business (50-249 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 5-6
∙ Physical access control system badge inventory
∙ Key management log or key cabinet (e.g., KeyWatcher)
∙ Annual reconciliation
Large Business (250-999 staff) / BLS Firm Size Classes 7-8
∙ PACS credential inventory reconciled with HR roster
∙ Electronic key management system (e.g., Traka, KeyWatcher)
∙ Quarterly reconciliation
Enterprise (> 1,000 staff) / BLS Firm Size Class 9
∙ Enterprise PACS credential lifecycle management
∙ Electronic key management with audit trail
∙ Automated reconciliation against identity system
SCR-CMM
Level 0 Not Performed
Practices are non-existent, based on the inability to demonstrate an implemented and operational capability. A reasonable person would conclude the control is not being performed.
Level 1 Performed Informally
Physical & Environmental Security (PES) domain capabilities are ad hoc and inconsistent. Capability criteria associated with this control may include:
▪ Policies, standards & procedures associated with PES domain capabilities provide limited coverage due to the depth and breadth of the existing documentation.
▪ Physical security-related activities are decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
▪ Physical security controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards), focusing on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs).
▪ IT and/or cybersecurity personnel implement appropriate physical security practices to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's technology assets and data.
Level 2 Planned Tracked
SCR-CMM Level 2 criteria definitions are not available for this control:
▪ A reasonable person would conclude a well-defined and standardized process is required.
▪ At this level of maturity, the “requirements-driven” nature of performing the control is focused on a localized and/or regionalized implementation, not uniform and consistent across the organization.
▪ Requirements are narrowly scoped for applicability and are primarily derived from compliance obligations (e.g., laws, regulations and contracts).
Level 3 Well Defined
Physical & Environmental Security (PES) capabilities are standardized across the entity for applicability to People, Processes, Technologies, Data and/or Facilities (PPTDF) to ensure consistency for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Policies and standards associated with PES domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function.
▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with PES domain capabilities are well-documented and kept current by process owners.
▪ A facilities management team, or similar function, is appropriately staffed and supported to implement and maintain NET domain capabilities.
▪ Technology is leveraged to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of physical and environmental security operations (e.g., facility management solution, visitor log management automation and proximity badge access).
▪ The entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function, works with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with PES domain capabilities to address Minimum Compliance Requirements (MCR) (e.g., applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements) and Discretionary Security Requirements (DSR) (e.g., entity-required controls).
▪ An implemented and operational capability exists to maintain an accurate inventory of all physical access devices (e.g., RFID cards, access fobs and door keys).
Level 4 Quantitatively Controlled
Physical & Environmental Security (PES) capabilities, in addition to being standardized across the entity and centrally managed to ensure consistency across Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD), efforts are metrics driven to provide sufficient insight for decision makers to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and/or identify areas for improvement. Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Applicable SCR-CMM Level 3 (Well Defined) capabilities are implemented and operational.
▪ Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
▪ Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
▪ Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
▪ Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
▪ Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
▪ Business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes to evolve capabilities.
Level 5 Continuously Improving
Physical & Environmental Security (PES) capabilities, in addition to being standardized across the entity and centrally managed to ensure consistency across Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD), efforts are metrics driven to provide sufficient insight for decision makers to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and/or identify areas for improvement. Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist:
▪ Applicable SCR-CMM Level 3 (Well Defined) capabilities are implemented and operational.
▪ Based on predictive analysis, process improvements are implemented according to “continuous improvement” practices that affect process changes.
▪ Stakeholders make time-sensitive decisions to support operational efficiency, which may include automated remediation actions via Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Machine Learning (ML) technologies.
|
1.1 Referințe
1.2 Cerințe identificate
1.3 Reglementări asociate
2. Cerințe identificate
3. Reglementări asociate
Reglementări
| Sursă |
Reglementare |
|
EULAW
|
Articolul 21 Controlul accesului
Articolul 21
Ca parte a controlului pe care îl exercită asupra drepturilor de gestionare a accesului, entitățile financiare elaborează, documentează și pun în aplicare o politică ce conține toate elementele următoare:
(a)
atribuirea drepturilor de acces la activele TIC pe baza principiului necesității de a cunoaște, al necesității de a utiliza și al celor mai mici privilegii, inclusiv pentru accesul la distanță și de urgență;
(b)
separarea sarcinilor pentru a preveni accesul nejustificat la datele critice sau a preveni alocarea combinațiilor de drepturi de acces care ar putea fi utilizate pentru eludarea controalelor;
(c)
o dispoziție privind răspunderea utilizatorului, prin limitarea, în măsura posibilului, a utilizării conturilor de utilizator generice și partajate și prin asigurarea faptului că utilizatorii sunt identificabili pentru acțiunile pe care le efectuează în sistemele TIC în orice moment;
(d)
o dispoziție privind restricțiile de acces la activele TIC, care să stabilească controalele și instrumentele de prevenire a accesului neautorizat;
(e)
proceduri de gestionare a conturilor pentru acordarea, modificarea sau revocarea drepturilor de acces pentru conturile de utilizator și conturile generice, inclusiv pentru conturile de administrator generice, care conțin dispoziții privind toate elementele următoare:
(i)
atribuirea rolurilor și a responsabilităților pentru acordarea, revizuirea și revocarea drepturilor de acces;
(ii)
atribuirea accesului privilegiat, a accesului în situații de urgență și a accesului cu drepturi de administrator pe baza principiului necesității de a utiliza sau ad-hoc pentru toate sistemele TIC;
(iii)
retragerea drepturilor de acces fără întârzieri nejustificate la încetarea contractului de muncă sau atunci când accesul nu mai este necesar;
(iv)
actualizarea drepturilor de acces în cazul în care sunt necesare modificări și cel puțin o dată pe an pentru toate sistemele TIC, altele decât sistemele TIC care sprijină funcții critice sau importante și cel puțin o dată la 6 luni pentru sistemele TIC care sprijină funcții critice sau importante;
(f)
metode de autentificare care includ toate elementele următoare:
(i)
utilizarea unor metode de autentificare proporționale cu clasificarea stabilită în conformitate cu articolul 8 alineatul (1) din Regulamentul (UE) 2022/2554 și cu profilul general de risc al activelor TIC și luând în considerare cele mai avansate practici;
(ii)
utilizarea unor metode de autentificare puternice în conformitate cu cele mai avansate practici și tehnici pentru accesul de la distanță la rețeaua entității financiare, pentru accesul privilegiat și pentru accesul la active TIC care sprijină funcții critice sau importante sau la active TIC accesibile publicului;
(g)
măsuri de control al accesului fizic care includ:
(i)
identificarea și înregistrarea persoanelor fizice autorizate să aibă acces la sedii, centre de date și zone sensibile desemnate identificate de entitatea financiară în care sunt situate activele TIC și informaționale;
(ii)
acordarea drepturilor de acces fizic la activele TIC esențiale numai persoanelor autorizate, în conformitate cu principiul necesității de a cunoaște și al celor mai mici privilegii și ad-hoc;
(iii)
monitorizarea accesului fizic la sedii, centre de date și zone sensibile desemnate identificate de entitatea financiară în care sunt se află activele TIC și/sau informaționale;
(iv)
revizuirea drepturilor fizice de acces pentru a se asigura că se revocă prompt drepturile de acces inutile.
În sensul literei (e) punctul (i), entitățile financiare stabilesc perioada de păstrare, ținând seama de obiectivele în materie de securitate a activității și a informațiilor, de motivele înregistrării evenimentului în jurnal și de rezultatele evaluării riscurilor TIC.
În sensul literei (e) punctul (ii), entitățile financiare utilizează, în măsura posibilului, conturi specifice pentru îndeplinirea sarcinilor administrative legate de sistemele TIC. Atunci când este fezabil și adecvat, entitățile financiare implementează soluții automatizate pentru gestionarea accesului privilegiat.
În sensul literei (g) punctul (i), identificarea și jurnalizarea sunt proporționale cu importanța sediilor, a centrelor de date și a zonelor sensibile desemnate și cu caracterul critic al operațiunilor sau al sistemelor TIC situate în acestea.
În sensul literei (g) punctul (iii), monitorizarea este proporțională cu clasificarea stabilită în conformitate cu articolul 8 alineatul (1) din Regulamentul (UE) 2022/2554 și cu caracterul critic al zonei accesate.
|
|
EULAW
|
Articolul 32 Securitatea fizică și de mediu
|
|
EULAW
|
Articolul 33 Controlul accesului
Articolul 33
Entitățile financiare menționate la articolul 16 alineatul (1) din Regulamentul (UE) 2022/2554 elaborează, documentează și pun în aplicare proceduri pentru controlul accesului logic și fizic și asigură respectarea, monitorizarea și revizuirea periodică a procedurilor respective. Aceste proceduri conțin următoarele elemente de control al accesului logic și fizic:
(a)
drepturile de acces la activele informaționale, la activele TIC și la funcțiile sprijinite de acestea, precum și la locurile critice unde operează entitatea financiară sunt gestionate pe baza principiului necesității de a cunoaște, al necesității de a utiliza și al celor mai mici privilegii, inclusiv pentru accesul la distanță și accesul de urgență;
(b)
răspunderea utilizatorului, care asigură faptul că utilizatorii pot fi identificați atunci când efectuează acțiuni în sistemele TIC;
(c)
proceduri de gestionare a conturilor pentru acordarea, modificarea sau revocarea drepturilor de acces pentru conturile de utilizator și conturile generice, inclusiv pentru conturile de administrator generice;
(d)
metode de autentificare care sunt proporționale cu clasificarea menționată la articolul 30 alineatul (1) și cu profilul general de risc al activelor TIC și care se bazează pe cele mai avansate practici;
(e)
drepturile de acces sunt revizuite periodic și sunt retrase atunci când nu mai sunt necesare.
În sensul literei (c), entitatea financiară acordă acces privilegiat, acces de urgență și acces cu drepturi de administrator pe baza principiului necesității de a cunoaște sau ad-hoc pentru toate sistemele TIC și înregistrează evenimentele de acces respective în jurnale în conformitate cu articolul 34 primul paragraf litera (f).
În sensul literei (d), entitățile financiare utilizează metode de autentificare puternică bazate pe cele mai avansate practici pentru accesul de la distanță la rețeaua entităților financiare, pentru accesul privilegiat și pentru accesul la activele TIC care sprijină funcții critice sau importante care sunt disponibile publicului.
|
Tichete legate
- Secure Controls Framework -
"The SCF is the Common Controls Framework™ (CCF), the world's most comprehensive cybersecurity and data privacy metaframework - it is also free to use. The entire concept is building secure, compliant and resilient capabilities in the most efficient and cost-effective manner possible.
The SCF is more than just a unified control catalog, since its included content creates a playbook for Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) capabilities. Used globally by organizations of every size, the SCF is a robust and scalable solution for security, compliance and resilience controls. As a comprehensive security framework, the SCF maps 1,400+ controls across 200+ laws, regulations, and industry frameworks so you can implement once and comply everywhere.
Like it or not, cybersecurity is a protracted war on an asymmetric battlefield, where the threats are everywhere and as defenders we have to make the effort to work together to help improve cybersecurity and data privacy practices, since we all suffer when massive data breaches occur or when cyber attacks have physical impacts. Hackers share information on attack methods with other hackers, so why shouldn’t the good guys share information on how to best protect an organization? We decided to take action and make a difference, since we feel it is too important to wait for someone else to fix the problems that exist.
The SCF is made up of volunteers, mainly specialists within the cybersecurity profession, who focus on GRC and the cybersecurity side of data privacy. These are auditors, engineers, architects, incident responders, consultants and other specialists who live and breathe these topics on a daily basis. The end product is "expert-derived content" that makes up the SCF." https://securecontrolsframework.com/
Terms & Conditions
The SCF End User License Agreement (EULA) governs the use of the Secure Controls Framework® (SCF) under the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License.
|