86. Where the CASP is fully satisfied that the self-hosted address is owned or controlled by its …

Where the CASP is fully satisfied that the self-hosted address is owned or controlled by its customer, the CASP should document this in its systems and may not need to re-apply the measures above to subsequent transactions from/to the same address ( ‘ whitelisting ’ ). A CASP making use of whitelisting should have controls in place to identify changes in the ML/TF risk of the self-hosted address and its ownership or controllership. Should the CASP establish that the ML/TF risk of the self-hosted address has changed or that there are indications that its customer no longer owns or controls the self-hosted address, it should remove this address from its whitelist.

4.8.5. Mitigating measures to put in place regarding transfers from or to a self-hosted address

1. Overview

1.1 References

1.2 Identified Requirements

1.3 Related Standards

2. Identified Requirements

3. Related Standards

• EBA -

  EN: Guidelines and other publications of the European Banking Authority (EBA), https://www.eba.europa.eu/. © European Banking Authority. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged (EBA legal notice). Divided into sections and converted into the GRCA format, the wording unchanged. Only the versions published by the EBA are authoritative.

  DE: Leitlinien und weitere Veröffentlichungen der Europäischen Bankenaufsichtsbehörde (EBA), https://www.eba.europa.eu/. © European Banking Authority. Wiedergabe mit Quellenangabe gestattet (Rechtlicher Hinweis der EBA). In Abschnitte aufgeteilt und in das GRCA-Format umgewandelt, der Wortlaut unverändert. Maßgeblich sind allein die von der EBA veröffentlichten Fassungen.