+4.5. Calculation of the aggregate risk weight (ARW)
---+26. The DGS should assign the ARW for a member institution ‘i’ on the basis of the ARS for that …
---+27. The DGS should calculate the ARS by summing up all individual indicators’ risk scores (IRS) of …
---+28. The DGS should calculate the IRS based on appropriate risk indicators.
---+(i) Risk categories and risk indicators
------+29. The DGS should calculate the ARW for an individual member institution based on a set of risk …
------+30. Within each risk category, the DGS should include the core risk indicators specified in Table 1 …
------+31. Where the competent authority in cooperation with the designated authority or the DGS remove a …
------+32. DGS should apply either of the Capital Coverage Ratio or the Common Equity Tier 1 ratio as a …
---+Table 1: Core risk indicators
---+1. Capital
---+2. Liquidity and funding
---+3. Asset quality
---+4. Business model and management
------+33. In addition to the core risk indicators, the DGS may define and include additional risk …
------+34. If a Member State has, through regulation, imposed restrictions on institutions within a …
------+35. The DGS may reduce the contributions of a member institution that is part of an institutional …
------+36. The DGS should use risk indicators that capture a sufficiently wide spectrum of sources of risk …
------+37. The DGS should align the selection of the risk indicators with the best practices in risk …
------+38. The DGS should use the values of risk indicators for each member institution calculated on an …
------+39. However, the DGS should calculate the value of risk indicators at a consolidated level where …
------+40. Where a member institution has received a waiver from meeting capital and/or liquidity …
------+41. To calculate values of risk indicators for a given period the DGS should use: a. the value at …
---+(ii) Weights for risk indicators and categories
------+42. The DGS should assign weights to all risk indicators in the method for calculating …
------+43. When assigning weights to particular risk indicators, the DGS should assign at least the …
------+44. The sum of the minimum weights specified in these Guidelines for the risk categories and the …
------+45. The DGS should allocate the flexible 25% of weights by distributing them among the additional …
------+46. Where a core indicator is not used, the DGS should assign the remaining core indicator from the …
------+47. Where there is only one core indicator in a category, and this core indicator is not used, the …
------+48. For any risk indicator, the DGS should assign it one weight and apply that same weight for all …
---+(iii) Individual risk indicators (IRS)
------+49. For each value of a risk indicator, the DGS should assign an individual risk score (IRS) …
------+50. DGSs should apply expert judgement to calibrate the thresholds, but should in any case respect …
------+51. In the ‘bucket’ method, for a given risk indicator, the DGS defines a fixed number of risk …
------+52. For each bucket of a risk indicator ‘ j ’ , the DGS should determine an upper and lower …
------+53. The DGS should set the number and boundaries of the buckets to ensure there is sufficient and …
------+54. The DGS should not set an upper boundary for the highest bucket and should not set a lower …
------+55. For each bucket of a risk indicator, the DGS should assign a corresponding IRS. The DGS should …
------+56. In this method, for each institution ‘I’ and for each risk indicator ‘ j ’ , the DGS should …
------+57. For each risk indicator the DGS should calibrate the upper boundary ‘ 𝑎 𝑗 ’ and the lower …
---+(iv) Aggregating the IRS into the ARS
------+58. Each IRS of the risk indicator ‘ j ’ for an institution ‘i’ should be multiplied by the risk IW …
---+(v) Calculating the ARW based on the ARS
------+59. For every ARS, the DGS should assign a corresponding ARW by setting the thresholds for the ARW …
------+60. The DGS should assign the ARW to the ARS in such a way that it is possible for member …
------+61. The DGS should set the upper threshold ‘α’ and lower threshold ‘β’ of the ARW to reflect the …
------+62. The DGS should set the upper threshold ‘α’ of the ARW between 150% and 200%.
------+63. The DGS should set the lower threshold ‘β’ of the ARW between 50% and 75%.
------+64. The DGS may set a wider interval upon justification that the interval limited to 50%-200% does …
------+65. If the DGS applies the bucket method, it should define ranges for the ARS in such a way that …
------+66. The DGS should set the number of buckets ‘ P ’ in proportion to the number and variety of …
------+67. If the DGS applies the sliding scale method, it should assign each ARS a corresponding ARW …
---+𝐴𝑅𝑊 𝑖 = 𝛽 ∗ ( 𝛼 𝛽 ) ( 𝐴𝑅𝑆 𝑖 )
------+68. In this method, the ARW associated to the ARS is growing exponentially, with an upper boundary …
------+69. Where the distribution of the ARS of member institutions of a DGS covers only a partial range …
------+70. The DGS should set the thresholds ‘ γ ’ and ‘ 𝛿 ’ so that no member institution ’s ARS exceeds …
|
4.5. Calculation of the aggregate risk weight (ARW)
4.5. Calculation of the aggregate risk weight (ARW)
1. Overview
| Summary |
Regulation |
|
26. The DGS should assign the ARW for a member institution ‘i’ on the basis of the ARS for that …
|
The DGS should assign the ARW for a member institution ‘i’ on the basis of the ARS for that institution.
|
|
27. The DGS should calculate the ARS by summing up all individual indicators’ risk scores (IRS) of …
|
The DGS should calculate the ARS by summing up all individual indicators’ risk scores (IRS) of that member institution, multiplied by appropriate indicator weights (IW) for each IRS.
|
|
28. The DGS should calculate the IRS based on appropriate risk indicators.
|
The DGS should calculate the IRS based on appropriate risk indicators.
|
|
(i) Risk categories and risk indicators
|
Risk categories
|
|
Table 1: Core risk indicators
|
Indicator name Formula / Description Sign
|
|
1. Capital
|
1.1. Leverage Ratio Leverage Ratio as stated in Article 429 of Regulation (EU) (-) A higher value | 1.2.a Common Equity Tier 1 ratio (CET1 ratio) | No 575/2013 indicates lower risk CET1 ratio as stated in Article 92(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No (-) A higher value 575/2013 indicates lower risk | | 1.2.b Capital Coverage Ratio (CCR) | Actual CET1 ratio Actual own funds (-) A higher value Required CET1 ratio or Required own funds indicates lower risk Where: ‘own funds’ as stated in Article 4(118) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013. ‘required CET1’ and ‘required own funds’ refer to the total CET1 and total own funds requirements of an institution according to Article 92 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, Article 104(1)(a) and Article 128 (6) of Directive 2013/36/EU. |
|
|
2. Liquidity and funding
|
2.1. Liquidity Coverage LCR as stated in Article 412 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (-) A higher value Ratio (LCR) indicates lower risk 2.2. Net Stable Funding NSFR as defined in Article 428a-428az of Regulation (EU) No (-) A higher value Ratio (NSFR) 575/2013 indicates lower risk
|
|
3. Asset quality
|
3.1 Non-performing NPL ratio as specified in Article 11(2) subparagraph (g) (+) A higher value loans ratio (NPL ratio) point (ii) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) indicates higher risk 2021/45114
14 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/451 of 17 December 2020 laying down implementing technical standards for the application of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 .
|
|
4. Business model and management
|
4.1. Total risk exposure Total Risk Exposure Amount (TREA) (+) A higher value amount (TREA) / Total Total Assets indicates higher risk assets ratio | Where: ‘T otal risk exposure amount ’ as stated in Article 92(3) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 DGSs may use different calibrations for member institutions using the internal ratings-based approach or the standardised methods for calculating risk weighted exposures amounts |
4.2 Return on assets Net Income (-)/(+) Generally, a (RoA) Total Assets higher value | indicates lower risk, DGSs should calculate the RoA as an average over at least 2 but too high values years to avoid including one-off events and avoid can also indicate procyclicality in contributions. high risk |
5. Potential losses for the DGS 5.1. Covered deposits / Covered Deposits (+) A higher value unencumbered assets Unencumbered Assets indicates higher risk | Where: ‘unencumbered assets’ is defined in Article 411(5) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013. |
Additional risk indicators
|
|
(ii) Weights for risk indicators and categories
|
(ii) Weights for risk indicators and categories
|
|
(iii) Individual risk indicators (IRS)
|
(iii) Individual risk indicators (IRS)
|
|
(iv) Aggregating the IRS into the ARS
|
(iv) Aggregating the IRS into the ARS
|
|
(v) Calculating the ARW based on the ARS
|
(v) Calculating the ARW based on the ARS
|
|
𝐴𝑅𝑊 𝑖 = 𝛽 ∗ ( 𝛼 𝛽 ) ( 𝐴𝑅𝑆 𝑖 )
|
Where: the ARS of an institution ‘I’ can take any value between 0 and 100; 𝛽 = 𝐴𝑅𝑊(0) , i.e. the desired ARW value corresponding to an ARS value of 0 (lower limit); and 𝛼 = 𝐴𝑅𝑊 ( 100 ) , i.e. the desired ARW value corresponding to an ARS of 100 (upper limit).
|
,
1.1 References
1.2 Identified Requirements
1.3 Related Standards
2. Identified Requirements
Requirements
| Source |
Requirement |
3. Related Standards
Standards
| Source |
Requirement |
- EBA - Published by the European Banking Authority at https://www.eba.europa.eu/
|