+Guidelines on the benchmarking exercises on remuneration practices, the gender pay gap and approved higher ratios under Directive 2013/36/EU
---+1. Scope of institutions to be included in the benchmarking data exercises
---+1.1 Scope of institutions for the remuneration data collection
------+15. Competent authorities should collect and submit to the EBA remuneration data from the largest …
------+16. Where the coverage of 60% referred to in the previous paragraph cannot be reasonably achieved …
---+1.2 Scope of institutions for the gender pay gap data collection
------+17. Competent authorities should collect and submit to the EBA gender pay gap data on an individual …
------+18. When applying paragraph 17, competent authorities should endeavour to collect gender pay gap …
---+1.3 Scope of institutions for the benchmarking of approved higher ratios
------+19. Competent authorities should collect, aggregate and submit to the EBA approved higher ratio …
---+2. Submission of benchmarking data to the competent authorities
------+20. To enable competent authorities to collect and submit to the EBA remuneration data in …
------+21. To enable competent authorities to collect and submit to the EBA gender pay gap data in …
------+22. To enable competent authorities to collect, aggregate and submit to the EBA approved higher …
------+23. To enable competent authorities to collect, aggregate and submit to the EBA approved higher …
---+3. Submission of benchmarking data to the EBA
---+3.1. List of institutions included in the benchmarking exercises
------+24. Competent authorities should inform the EBA, by 31 March of the calendar year following the …
------+25. Changes to the sample of institutions should be avoided as much as possible to ensure that the …
------+26. Competent authorities should, following a communication from the EBA, remove from the list …
------+27. Where there is more than one competent authority, e.g. one responsible for the prudential …
---+3.2. Submission of data to the EBA
------+28. Competent authorities should submit the information, after ensuring the completeness, accuracy …
---+4. General specifications for the submission of benchmarking data
------+29. When submitting benchmarking data in accordance with sections 2 and 3 and the Annexes of these …
------+30. Benchmarking data should be submitted using accounting year-end figures in EUR. Where …
------+31. All amounts should be reported as full amounts, i.e. not rounded amounts, in EUR (e.g. EUR 1 …
------+32. Benchmarking data for the calendar year in which the financial year ended should be submitted …
------+33. The allocation of submitted amounts to the fixed and variable components of remuneration should …
---+5. Additional specifications for remuneration data
------+34. Regarding the submission of tables REM1, REM2, REM3, REM4 and REM5, institutions should take …
------+35. The number of staff should be submitted as determined at the end of the financial year (i.e. …
------+36. When submitting tables REM1, REM2, REM3, REM4 and REM5 of Commission Implementing Regulation …
------+37. Information on remuneration awarded for the financial year should comprise the fixed and …
------+38. When submitting table REM1 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/637 in accordance …
------+39. When submitting tables REM1 and REM3 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/637 in …
------+40. Severance payments to identified staff should be included in the amount of variable …
------+41. Where identified staff left the institution before the end of the financial year, the …
------+42. Guaranteed variable remuneration should be included in the variable remuneration in table REM1 …
------+43. When submitting Annex I and table REM 5 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/637 …
------+44. For the allocation of staff to business areas, institutions should consider their internal …
---+5.1. Additional specifications for remuneration data under Annex II
------+45. Discretionary pension benefits should be included in table REM1 and, where deferral is applied …
------+46. Variable remuneration awarded based on multi-year accrual periods that do not revolve on an …
------+47. In addition to the table in Annex III on the impact of derogations under Article 94(3)(a) and …
---+5.2. Additional specifications for the remuneration data under
---+Annex III
------+48. Institutions should specify in Annex III if they are eligible to apply the derogations under …
------+49. Derogations under Article 94 (3) of Directive 2013/36/EU should be considered as applied when …
---+6. Additional instructions for the gender pay gap data in Annex IV
------+50. Institutions that are participating in the gender pay gap benchmarking exercise should …
------+51. Institutions should establish a list of all staff and determine which staff should be included …
------+52. The gender pay gap should be calculated as the difference between the average remuneration of …
------+53. For each staff member who should be included in the gender pay gap calculation in accordance …
------+54. Institutions should calculate the gender pay gap for all staff (including identified staff …
------+55. Institutions that have 250 or more staff should calculate the gender pay gap for each quartile …
------+56. Institutions should calculate the pay gap in terms of the representation of each gender as a …
------+57. The gender pay gap based on gross remuneration should be expressed as the difference between …
------+58. Institutions should comply with the following instructions in preparing the calculation: a. The …
------+59. All figures should be submitted as percentages with two decimal places (e.g. ‘ 17.23% ’ or ‘ - …
---+7. Data quality
------+60. Institutions and competent authorities should check the completeness and plausibility of the …
------+61. Where there are strong fluctuations of benchmarking data over time, the institution and the …
------+62. When checking the plausibility of benchmarking data, competent authorities should take into …
------+63. Where benchmarking data appear to be implausible, but are in fact correct, competent …
------+64. Regarding submitted benchmarking data that show potential data quality issues or are considered …
------+65. Competent authorities should provide, as necessary, corrected data or explanations for any …
------+66. When submitting benchmarking data to the EBA, competent authorities should ensure that they …
---+Annex I: General information and information on remuneration of all staff
------+(headcount)
------+Total number of staff, FTE
------+N (in EUR)
------+Total remuneration (EUR)
---+Annex II: Additional information on remuneration of identified staff
---+Annex III: Derogations from the application of requirements to pay out parts of variable remuneration deferred and in instruments under Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
---+Annex IV: Information on the gender pay gap
------+Institution (individual level) Name
------+Legal entity identifier Number
---+Representation of staff of different genders per quartile of remuneration level
------+level
---+Gender pay pap based on the total gross remuneration
---+Annex V: Approved higher ratios between variable and fixed remuneration – institutions
------+Institution name Name
------+Legal entity identifier LEI
---+Annex VI: Approved higher ratios between variable and fixed remuneration – aggregation by competent authorities
------+Changes versus the previous data submission
---+Annex VII – Data quality checks
------+Table REM1:
------+Table REM2
------+Row Data quality check
------+Table REM3
------+Row Data quality check
------+Table REM5
------+Row Data quality check
|
Guidelines on the benchmarking exercises on remuneration practices, the gender pay gap and approved higher ratios under Directive 2013/36/EU
Guidelines on the benchmarking exercises on remuneration practices, the gender pay gap and approved higher ratios under Directive 2013/36/EU
1. Overview
| Summary |
Regulation |
|
1. Scope of institutions to be included in the benchmarking data exercises
|
1. Scope of institutions to be included in the benchmarking data exercises
|
|
1.1 Scope of institutions for the remuneration data collection
|
1.1 Scope of institutions for the remuneration data collection
|
|
1.2 Scope of institutions for the gender pay gap data collection
|
1.2 Scope of institutions for the gender pay gap data collection
|
|
1.3 Scope of institutions for the benchmarking of approved higher ratios
|
1.3 Scope of institutions for the benchmarking of approved higher ratios
|
|
2. Submission of benchmarking data to the competent authorities
|
2. Submission of benchmarking data to the competent authorities
|
|
3. Submission of benchmarking data to the EBA
|
3. Submission of benchmarking data to the EBA
|
|
3.1. List of institutions included in the benchmarking exercises
|
3.1. List of institutions included in the benchmarking exercises
|
|
3.2. Submission of data to the EBA
|
3.2. Submission of data to the EBA
|
|
4. General specifications for the submission of benchmarking data
|
4. General specifications for the submission of benchmarking data
|
|
5. Additional specifications for remuneration data
|
5. Additional specifications for remuneration data
|
|
5.1. Additional specifications for remuneration data under Annex II
|
5.1. Additional specifications for remuneration data under Annex II
|
|
5.2. Additional specifications for the remuneration data under
|
5.2. Additional specifications for the remuneration data under
|
|
Annex III
|
Annex III
|
|
6. Additional instructions for the gender pay gap data in Annex IV
|
6. Additional instructions for the gender pay gap data in Annex IV
|
|
7. Data quality
|
7. Data quality
|
|
Annex I: General information and information on remuneration of all staff
|
Name of the institution/group Name Does the institution benefit from the derogation under Article 94 (3)(a) of Directive Yes/no 2013/36/EU at an institutional level? Financial year for which the remuneration is awarded (year N) Year | MB MB Investment Retail Asset Corporate Independent Supervisory Management banking banking management functions control function function functions | All staff in All other subsidiaries staff subject to a specific remuneration framework1 |
Number of members
1 Staff within investment firms, undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities or alternative investment fund manager companies that are subject to a specific remuneration framework under Union acts
|
|
Annex II: Additional information on remuneration of identified staff
|
Name of the institution/group: Name Financial year for which the remuneration is awarded (year N): Year | Management body Management body Other senior Other identified Supervisory Management management staff function function |
Number of beneficiaries of contributions to discretionary pension benefits in year N Total amount of contributions to discretionary pension benefits (in EUR) in year N (included in other forms of variable remuneration) Total amount of variable remuneration awarded for multi-year periods under programmes which are not revolved annually (in EUR) For institutions that do not benefit from the derogation under Article 94(3)(a) of Directive 2013/36/EU at an institution-wide level Total amount of variable remuneration of identified staff members benefiting from at least one of the derogations under Article 94(3)(b) of Directive 2013/36/EU, based on a low level of variable remuneration For institutions that do not benefit from the derogation under Article 94(3)(a) of Directive 2013/36/EU at an institution-wide level Total amount of fixed remuneration of identified staff members benefiting from at least one of the derogations under Article 94(3)(b) of Directive 2013/36/EU, based on a low level of variable remuneration
|
|
Annex III: Derogations from the application of requirements to pay out parts of variable remuneration deferred and in instruments under Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD)
|
| Name of the institution/group: Financial year for which the remuneration is awarded (year N): Information on the availability of waivers | Name Year Derogations on a firm-wide Derogations for identified basis under Article 94(3)(a) staff under Article 94(3)(b) CRD CRD | | Does the institution apply the derogations regarding the requirement to pay out a part of the variable remuneration deferred and in instruments under Article 94(3)(a) CRD to all its identified staff. If this question has been answered with ‘ yes ’ the information below does not need to be provided. Does the institution apply the derogation from the requirement under Article 94 (1)(l) CRD (pay-out in | Yes/no Yes/no Yes/no |
instruments) Where the institution applies the above derogation, but with a lower threshold as implemented under national Threshold law, please indicate the threshold applied in EUR | Number of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation Percentage of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation Total remuneration of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation Of which: variable remuneration Of which: fixed remuneration Does the institution apply the derogation from the requirement under Article 94 (1)(m) CRD (pay-out under | Headcount Headcount Percentage Percentage EUR EUR EUR EUR EUR EUR Yes/no Yes/no |
deferral arrangements) Where the institution applies the above derogation, but with a lower threshold as implemented under national Threshold law, please indicate the threshold applied in EUR | Number of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation Percentage of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation Total remuneration of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation Of which: variable remuneration Of which: fixed remuneration Does the institution apply the derogation from the requirement under Article 94 (1) second paragraph of point (o) (derogations with regard to the pay-out in instruments of discretionary pension benefits) Number of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation Total remuneration of identified staff benefitting from the above derogation Of which: variable remuneration Of which: fixed remuneration | Headcount Headcount Percentage Percentage EUR EUR EUR EUR EUR EUR Yes/no Yes/no Headcount Headcount EUR EUR EUR EUR EUR EUR |
24
|
|
Annex IV: Information on the gender pay gap
|
Annex IV: Information on the gender pay gap
|
|
Representation of staff of different genders per quartile of remuneration level
|
Representation of male and All male staff in percent of All female staff in percent All male identified staff in All female identified staff in female staff in each all staff of all staff percent based on all percent based on all quartile of remuneration identified staff identified staff
|
|
Gender pay pap based on the total gross remuneration
|
Total gross annual Gender pay gap of all staff, Gender pay gap of all staff, Gender pay gap of Gender pay gap of remuneration level based on median based on mean identified staff, based on identified staff based on median mean Quartile 1 (low) Percentage (e.g. 42.43%) Percentage Percentage Percentage Quartile 2 (low to medium) Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Quartile 3 (medium to high) Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Quartile 4 (high) Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Total staff/identified staff Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage 25
|
|
Annex V: Approved higher ratios between variable and fixed remuneration – institutions
|
Annex V: Approved higher ratios between variable and fixed remuneration – institutions
|
|
Annex VI: Approved higher ratios between variable and fixed remuneration – aggregation by competent authorities
|
Member State ISO code Year of the collected data yyyy Total number of institutions that have their legal seat within the Member State (additional information to be provided Number below) – e.g. derived from banking statistics Aggregated total number of staff of all institutions within the Member State Number Aggregated total number of identified staff of institutions within the Member State (where available, otherwise N/A) Number Aggregated balance sheet total of institutions within the Member State Number Number of institutions where shareholders have approved a higher ratio that have their legal seat within the Member Number State (additional information to be provided below) Thereof: number of institutions with their legal seat within the Member State that have approved 200% as the Number maximum ratio Aggregated total number of staff of these institutions Number Aggregated total number of identified staff of these institutions Number Aggregated balance sheet total of these institutions Number Aggregated total number of identified staff potentially benefitting from an approved ratio above 100% Number Aggregated total number of identified staff that have in fact been awarded remuneration that leads to a ratio of variable Number to fixed remuneration above 100% for the financial year
|
|
Annex VII – Data quality checks
|
Institutions and competent authorities should apply the following data quality checks with regard to the tables on remuneration included in the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/63714 .
|
,
1.1 References
1.2 Identified Requirements
1.3 Related Standards
2. Identified Requirements
Requirements
| Source |
Requirement |
3. Related Standards
Standards
| Source |
Requirement |
- EBA - Published by the European Banking Authority at https://www.eba.europa.eu/
|